Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:15:43.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Five ways of looking at Faith Healer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2007

Anthony Roche
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
Get access

Summary

One of the measures of a great work of the imagination is not just its openness to several different interpretations, but the unexplained residuum that it leaves after any and every interpretation. Faith Healer is a dramatic enactment of the fictions of memory; it is a portrait of the artist as charlatan/miracle worker; it is a parable of Irish exile and return; it is a secular theatrical recreation of religious rites: all true, or at least valid, illuminating readings. Yet watch or read the play once again, and something within the experience continues to elude any of these constructions of its meaning. The formal closure of Frank Hardy's final monologue, as he moves to leave the stage and face the death that has already taken place, does not yield itself to such explanation. Instead it enforces belief in what can be acted out but not fully understood.

Contested narratives

One story, three storytellers, each with their own way of recalling the past they have shared. On the surface Faith Healer looks like the sort of fiction where different narratives of the same events reveal the unreliability of the narrators: Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury has been suggested as one model; Kurosawa’s film Rashomon, another. Certainly, the four monologues that make up the play – first by Frank the traveling faith healer, then by his partner Grace, followed by his manager Teddy, and then by Frank again – do highlight the divergences between their accounts. There are significant discrepancies in the retelling of some of the principal events of their life together: the time when Grace and Frank were living in a converted byre in Norfolk, the miraculous cure of ten disabled people in Llanbethian in Wales, the baby stillborn in Kinlochbervie, Scotland, and the terminal encounter with the wedding guests in Ballybeg, County Donegal. The play puts up to an audience the puzzle of who is telling the truth, or what the individual distortions of the story may reveal about the characters.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×