Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Abbreviations
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Autoethnography: Memoir, Biography, Auto-What?
- 3 ASEAN Diplomacy and ASEAN Centrality
- 4 ASEAN Centrality as an Expression of ASEAN Leadership in the Region: The Philippine Chairmanship of ASEAN in 2017
- 5 ASEAN Centrality as a Principle of Diplomacy Among Member States
- 6 ASEAN Centrality as a Principle of Diplomacy with ASEAN’s External Partners
- 7 ASEAN Centrality as an Aspiration to Raise the Level of Awareness About ASEAN
- Bibliography
- Annexes
- Index
- About the Author
6 - ASEAN Centrality as a Principle of Diplomacy with ASEAN’s External Partners
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2023
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Abbreviations
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Autoethnography: Memoir, Biography, Auto-What?
- 3 ASEAN Diplomacy and ASEAN Centrality
- 4 ASEAN Centrality as an Expression of ASEAN Leadership in the Region: The Philippine Chairmanship of ASEAN in 2017
- 5 ASEAN Centrality as a Principle of Diplomacy Among Member States
- 6 ASEAN Centrality as a Principle of Diplomacy with ASEAN’s External Partners
- 7 ASEAN Centrality as an Aspiration to Raise the Level of Awareness About ASEAN
- Bibliography
- Annexes
- Index
- About the Author
Summary
Everywhere I spoke about ASEAN, I have always been asked about its importance, and even its relevance, in the face of its perceived failure to address at least three major issues—the South China Sea, the Northern Rakhine (Rohingya) problem and human rights. One of the quickest ways to counter arguments against the charges of the irrelevance of ASEAN is the fact that it has formal partnerships with all the major powers in the world—the United States, China, Russia, Japan and the European Union (EU) and many more are waiting in the queue. This is despite the long and arduous process of applying to become an External Partner. Even the seemingly simple act of signing the Instrument of Accession to the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC) follows the same long and sometimes cumbersome process that takes several months to complete. If ASEAN were irrelevant, I would say, why would these external parties go through all this? Obviously, the answer lies in their perception that indeed, ASEAN matters and that, of course, they would want to benefit from ASEAN’s growing economic and political/security importance as well as push their own agenda into that of ASEAN. The dynamics of how this happens will be the subject of this section, using the autoethnographic framework I described earlier.
ASEAN has not indicated any ranking or category of hierarchy for its external partners but it is generally understood that such a hierarchy exists. Among the Dialogue Partners (DPs), nine are sub-classified as Strategic Dialogue Partners (SDPs) while Canada has also indicated its desire to become one. This de facto categorization is reflected in Table 6.1.
The growing interest by other countries in ASEAN is also reflected in the number of applicants waiting to be accepted as external partners of ASEAN. These are: Bangladesh, the UK, Morocco, Fiji (Observer Status), Ecuador, Egypt, and Mongolia.
The TAC issued in 1976 is a fundamental peace treaty that all members, external partners and observers of ASEAN must accede to. Thus, countries and regional organizations desiring to apply for formal relationships with ASEAN regard it as their first step towards their acceptance for any category of external partnership.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- ASEAN CentralityAn Autoethnographic Account by a Philippine Diplomat, pp. 107 - 155Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak InstituteFirst published in: 2023