Book contents
- Appearance Bias and Crime
- Appearance Bias and Crime
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Biographical Sketches of Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Unattractiveness, Criminality, and Victimization
- Part II Race, Ethnicity, and Nationality as Targeted Identities
- Part III The Process of Social Control as Influenced by Appearance
- 6 Becoming and Being a Woman Prisoner
- 7 The Impact of Victim Attractiveness on Victim Blameworthiness and Defendant Guilt Determination in Cases of Domestic and Sexual Assault
- 8 Do Attractive Women “Get Away” with Traffic Violations? An Observational Study of Police Responses to Traffic Stops
- 9 The Police “Presence”
- Part IV Identifying Terrorists, Mistakenly or Not, by Appearance
- Part V Very Visible Differences
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
7 - The Impact of Victim Attractiveness on Victim Blameworthiness and Defendant Guilt Determination in Cases of Domestic and Sexual Assault
from Part III - The Process of Social Control as Influenced by Appearance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 March 2019
Book contents
- Appearance Bias and Crime
- Appearance Bias and Crime
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Biographical Sketches of Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Unattractiveness, Criminality, and Victimization
- Part II Race, Ethnicity, and Nationality as Targeted Identities
- Part III The Process of Social Control as Influenced by Appearance
- 6 Becoming and Being a Woman Prisoner
- 7 The Impact of Victim Attractiveness on Victim Blameworthiness and Defendant Guilt Determination in Cases of Domestic and Sexual Assault
- 8 Do Attractive Women “Get Away” with Traffic Violations? An Observational Study of Police Responses to Traffic Stops
- 9 The Police “Presence”
- Part IV Identifying Terrorists, Mistakenly or Not, by Appearance
- Part V Very Visible Differences
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Appearance Bias and Crime , pp. 142 - 153Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Ahola, A. S., Christianson, S. Å., & Hellstrӧm, Å. (2009). Justice needs a blindfold: Effects of gender and attractiveness on prison sentences and attributions of personal characteristics in a judicial process. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 16, S90–S100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergeron, C. E. & McKelvie, S. J. (2004). Effects of defendant age on severity of punishment for difference crimes. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, D. M., Ames, M. A., Etherington, R., & Pietsch, J. (1990). Effects of victim’s and defendant’s physical attractiveness on the perception of responsibility in an ambiguous domestic violence case. Journal of Family Violence, 5, 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, L. G., Selby, J. W., Cann, A., & Keller, G. T. (1978). The effects of victim physical attractiveness and sex of respondent on social reactions to victims of rape. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 191–192.Google Scholar
Callan, M. J., Powell, N. G., & Ellard, J. H. (2007). The consequences of victim physical attractiveness on reactions to injustice: The role of observers’ belief in a just world. Social Justice Research, 20, 433–456.Google Scholar
Castellow, W. A., Wuensch, K. L., & Moore, C. H. (1990). Effects of physical attractiveness of the plaintiff and defendant in sexual harassment judgments. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 547–562.Google Scholar
Darby, B. W. & Jeffers, D. (1988). The effects of defendant and juror attractiveness on simulated courtroom trial decisions. Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erian, M., Lin, C., Patel, N., Neal, A., & Geiselman, R. E. (1998). Juror verdicts as a function of victim and defendant attractiveness in sexual assault cases. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 16, 25–40.Google Scholar
Gerdes, E. P., Dammann, E. J., & Heilig, K. E. (1988). Perceptions of rape victims and assailants: Effects of physical attractiveness, acquaintance, and subject gender. Sex Roles, 19, 141–153.Google Scholar
Hodell, E. C., Wasarhaley, N. E., Lynch, K. R., & Golding, J. M. (2014). Mock juror gender biases and perceptions of self-defense claims in intimate partner homicide. Journal of Family Violence, 29, 495–506.Google Scholar
Jacobson, M. B. (1981). Effects of victim’s and defendant’s physical attractiveness on subjects’ judgments in a rape case. Sex Roles, 7, 247–255.Google Scholar
Jacobson, M. B. & Popovich, P. M. (1983). Victim attractiveness and perceptions of responsibility in an ambiguous rape case. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 100–104.Google Scholar
Jones, C. & Aronson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415–419.Google Scholar
Kerr, N. L. (1978). Beautiful and blameless: Effects of victim attractiveness and responsibility on mock jurors’ verdicts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 479–482.Google Scholar
Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer’s reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 355–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
MacCoun, R. J. (1990). The emergence of extralegal bias during jury deliberation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 303–314.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. E. & Byrne, D. (1973). The defendant’s dilemma: Effects of jurors’ attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 123–129.Google Scholar
Moore, C. H., Wuensch, K. L., Hedges, R. M., & Castellow, W. A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness and social desirability on judgments regarding a sexual harassment case. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 715–730.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. H. & Nock, S. L. (Eds.). (1982). Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sargent, M. J. & Bradfield, A. L. (2004). Race and information processing in criminal trials: Does the defendant’s race affect how the facts are evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 995–1008.Google Scholar
Seligman, C., Brickman, J., & Koulack, D. (1977). Rape and physical attractiveness: Assigning responsibility to victims. Journal of Personality, 45, 554–563.Google Scholar
Shechory-Britton, M. & Zvi, L. (2016). Does offenders’ facial attractiveness affect police officers’ judgment? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23, 588–601.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. E. II. (1980). Defendant’s attractiveness as a factor in the outcome of criminal trials: An observational study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 348–361.Google Scholar
Thornton, B. (1977). Effect of rape victim’s attractiveness in a jury simulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 666–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, B. & Ryckman, R. M. (1983). The influence of a rape victim’s physical attractiveness on observers’ attributions of responsibility. Human Relations, 36, 549–562.Google Scholar
Villemur, N. K. & Hyde, J. S. (1983). Effects of sex of defense attorney, sex or juror, and age and attractiveness of the victim on mock juror decision making in a rape case. Sex Roles, 9, 879–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by