Book contents
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Analysing Religious Discourse: Introduction
- 2 Interaction
- 3 Ethnography
- 4 Narrative
- 5 Multimodality
- 6 Rhetoric
- 7 Translation
- 8 Institutions
- 9 Media
- 10 Community
- 11 Education
- 12 Inter-religious Dialogue
- 13 Rituals
- 14 Metaphor
- 15 Emotion
- 16 Identity
- 17 Cognition
- 18 Sacred Texts
- 19 Ecology
- 20 Conclusion
- Key Terms
- References
9 - Media
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Analysing Religious Discourse
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Analysing Religious Discourse: Introduction
- 2 Interaction
- 3 Ethnography
- 4 Narrative
- 5 Multimodality
- 6 Rhetoric
- 7 Translation
- 8 Institutions
- 9 Media
- 10 Community
- 11 Education
- 12 Inter-religious Dialogue
- 13 Rituals
- 14 Metaphor
- 15 Emotion
- 16 Identity
- 17 Cognition
- 18 Sacred Texts
- 19 Ecology
- 20 Conclusion
- Key Terms
- References
Summary
Looks at media, and the ways that technology in the recent past has changed how people talk about religious belief in and practice, and the consequences of those changes on how people think, believe, and act.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Analysing Religious Discourse , pp. 144 - 161Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
9.5 References
Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5. www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1610.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2010). Localizing the Global on the Participatory Web: The Handbook of Language and Globalization (pp. 201–31). Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 335–42.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. (2002). Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para fines específicos (AELFE), 4, 3–19.Google Scholar
Bruce, T. (2017). New technologies, continuing ideologies: Online reader comments as a support for media perspectives of minority religions. Discourse, Context & Media.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Zazie, Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 63–89.Google Scholar
Chilton, P, & Kopytowska, M. (2018). Religion, Language, and the Human Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Creese, A. (2008). Linguistic ethnography. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2, 229–41.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J., & Hymes, D. (1972). Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Herring, S. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hjarvard, S. (2013). The Mediatization of Culture and Society. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, T. (2017). Creating Church Online: Ritual, Community and New Media. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manovich, L (2001). Post-media aesthetics. In Kinder, Marsha & McPherson, Tara (eds.), Transmedia Frictions: The Digital, the Arts, and the Humanities (pp. 34–44). Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin UK.Google Scholar
Pihlaja, S. (2018). Religious Talk Online: The Evangelical Discourse of Muslims, Christians, and Atheists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pihlaja, S. (2021). Talk about Faith: How Debate and Conversation Shape Belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rampton, B., Tusting, K., Maybin, J., Barwell, R., Creese, A., & Lytra, V. (2004). UK Linguistic Ethnography: A Discussion Paper. Linguistic Ethnography Forum website: www.ling-ethnog.org.uk.Google Scholar
Trammell, J. (2015). Jesus? There’s an App for That! Tablet Media in the “New” Electronic Church. In Ward, Mark (ed.), The Electronic Church in the Digital Age: Cultural Impacts of Evangelical Mass Media (pp. 219–37). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Tusting, K., & Maybin, J. (2007). Linguistic ethnography and interdisciplinarity: Opening the discussion. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 575–83.Google Scholar
van Noppen, J. P. (2006). From theolinguistics to critical theolinguistics: The case for communicative probity. ARC, The Journal of the Faculty of Religious Studies, McGill University, 34, 47–65.Google Scholar
van Noppen, J. P. (2012). God in George W. Bush’s Rhetoric. www.o-re-la.org/index.php/analyses/item/175-god-in-george-w-bush%E2%80%99s-rhetoric.Google Scholar