Inter-religious Dialogue

doi:10.1017/9781108863957.012

12 - Inter-religious Dialogue

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2021

Alain Wolf

Edited by

Stephen Pihlaja

Show author details

Stephen Pihlaja: Affiliation:
Newman University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Describes inter-religious dialogue, focusing on the issue of speaking across religious traditions as a kind of translation and looking specifically at how institutional religious documents deal with the issue of other religious traditions and what this shows about the nature of religious belief.

Keywords

Inter-religious Dialogue religion language belief practice

Type: Chapter
Information: Analysing Religious Discourse , pp. 197 - 216

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108863957.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

12.5 References

Albera, D., & Pénicaud, M. (2017). Uneterresainteetsaturée de sens. In Albera, D. & Pénicaud, M. (eds.), Coexistences, Lieux Saints Partagés en Europe et en Méditerranée (pp. 27–40). Marseilles: Actes Sud.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1988). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Bhabha, H. K. (2011). Hybridity. Translation: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 1, 37–40.Google Scholar

Berman, A. (1984). L’épreuve de l’étranger. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Brink-Dana, M. (2015). Faith in conversation: Translation, translanguaging, and the British God debate. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 25(2), 173–94.Google Scholar

Burrell, D. (2004). Interfaith perspectives on reconciliation. New Blackfriars, 85(995), 44–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clifford, A. (2005). The global horizon of religious pluralism and local dialogue with the religious-other. In Tilley, T. (ed.), New Horizons in Theology (pp. 162–81). Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.Google Scholar

Debray, R. (2002). Qu’est-ce qu’un fait religieux? Études, 397, 169–80.Google Scholar

Ducrot, O. (1984). Le dire et le dit. Paris: Editions Minuit.Google Scholar

European Committee of Ministers. (2008). The recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the dimension of religions and non-religious convictions within intercultural communication adopted at the 1044th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies, 10 December 2008. www.europeanrights.eu/public/atti/dimensione_religiosa_ing.HTM.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1981). L’ordre du Discours. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Gaudé, J. (2010). Religious Translation. In Gambier, Y. & Van Doorslaer, L. (eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies (pp. 285–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66(3), 377–88.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. (1982). Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hallett, G. (2011). Theology within the Bounds of Language: A Methodological Tour. New York: State University of New York Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haugh, M. (2008). Intention and diverging interpretings of implicature in the ‘uncovered meat’ sermon. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5(2), 201–28.Google Scholar

Haugh, M. (2019). The metapragmatics of consideration in Australian and New Zealand English. In Ogierman, E. & Garces-Conejos, P. (eds.), From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness (pp. 1–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hick, J. (1985). Problems of Religious Pluralism. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Huntington, S. P. (1993). Clash of Civilizations. Foreign Affairs, 72(3 Summer), 22–49.Google Scholar

Ipgrave, M. (2008). Understanding, affirmation, sharing: Nostra Aetate and an Anglican approach to inter-faith relations. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 43(1), 1–16.Google Scholar

Ipgrave, M. (2014). Remembering the covenant: Judaism in an Anglican theology of interfaith relations. Anglican Theological Review, 96(1), 39–55.Google Scholar

Jerome, , St. (2004). Letter to Pammachius, trans. Davis, K. In L. Venuti (ed.), The Translation Studies Reader (pp. 21–30). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lambert, W. E. (1975). Culture and language as factors in learning and education. In Wolfgang, A. (ed.), Education of Immigrant Students. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar

Lindbeck, G. (1997). The Gospel’s uniqueness: Election and untranslatability. Modern Theology, 13, 423–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Knitter, P. (1985). No Other Name? London: SCM Press.Google Scholar

Krieger, D. J. (1991). The New Universalism. New York: Orbis Books.Google Scholar

Neusner, J. (1991). Jews and Christians: The Myth of a Common Tradition. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar

Panikkar, R. (1979). Myth, Faith and Hermeneutics. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar

Quash, B., &Jenkins, T. (2009). Cambridge Interfaith Programme. www.interfaith.cam.ac.uk/en/resources/papers/cip-academic-profile.Google Scholar

Robinson-Pant, A., &Wolf, A. (2017). Researching across Languages and Cultures: A Guide to Doing Research Interculturally. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ruparell, T. (2013). Inter-religious dialogue and interstitial theology. In Cornille, C. (ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Inter-Religious Dialogue (pp. 117–32). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Steiner, G. (1998). After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thibon, J. J. (2010). Les transformations du dialogue islamo-chrétien: Versl’ émergenced’une parole commune dansl’espace public. In Dacheux, E. (ed.), Vivre Ensemble Aujourd’ hui: Le lien social dans les démocratiespluriculturelles (pp. 209–22). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Tillich, P. (1963). Christianity and the Encounter of the World Religions. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Todorov, T. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle, trans. W. Godzich. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

United Nations. (2007). General Assembly session on interreligious dialogue advances values – President’ in UN News. https://news.un.org/en/story/2007/10/234912-general-assembly-session-interreligious-dialogue-advances-values-president.Google Scholar

Venuti, L. (1998). The Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ethics of Difference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Verschueren, J. (2008). Intercultural communication and the challenges of migration.Language and Intercultural Communication, 8(1), 21–35.Google Scholar

Weitzman, M. (2001). Judaism. In Sawyer, J. & Simpson, J. (eds.), Concise Encyclopedia of Language and Religion (pp. 68–72). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Wetherell, M. (2001). Debates in Discourse Research. In Wetherell, M., Taylor, S. & Yates, S. (eds.), Discourse Theory and Practice (pp. 380–99). Thousands Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar

Wijsen, F. (2007). Seeds of Conflict in a Haven of Peace: From Religious Studies to Inter-religious Studies in Africa. New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Wijsen, F. (2013). Discourse Analysis in Religious Studies. Religion, 1/43, 1–3.CrossRef Google Scholar

Winter, , (2001). Qur’an Translations. In Sawyer, J. & Simpson, J. (eds.), Concise Encyclopedia of Language and Religion (p. 133). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker & J. Schulte. Rev. 4th ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wolf, A. (2012). Intercultural identity and inter-religious dialogue: a holy place to be? Language and Intercultural Communication, 12(1), 37–55.Google Scholar

Yule, G., & Brown, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.Google Scholar