Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 14 - What Hollywood, USA, Teaches the World (Incorrectly and Correctly) about Juries

  • from Part IV - Global Perspectives on Lay Participation
  • Edited by Sanja Kutnjak Ivković, Michigan State University, Shari Seidman Diamond, Northwestern University, Illinois, Valerie P. Hans, Cornell University, New York, Nancy S. Marder, Chicago-Kent College of Law
  • Book:
    Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts
    Published online:
    03 August 2021
    Print publication:
    29 July 2021, pp 285-303

  • Summary

    This chapter examines American jury films and what they teach the world about American juries. Some of the lessons they offer are instructive, but others do not comport with American juries in practice. One persistent and misleading message of jury films is that juries include a holdout juror, even though holdout jurors occur infrequently on actual juries. The most famous American jury film, 12 Angry Men, teaches this lesson; however, it also shows a jury that ultimately works hard to arrive at a responsible verdict, which is what most actual juries try to do. This film is enjoying an extraordinary renaissance; it is being remade into foreign versions across the globe. This chapter also explores how 12 Angry Men serves as a window into American juries; foreign remakes of it also provide a window into the aspirations of countries around the world.