We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Private regulation by dominant firms and the digital infrastructure of democracy controlled by some firms constitute the areas where the separation of powers principle, envisaged in a broad sense, and antitrust may share much common ground. A single dominant digital firm may adopt private regulation affecting an entire industry and even society at large, be an important part of the digital infrastructure of democracy and, through many means including lobbying, exercise a significant influence on public decision-makers. Such a firm concentrates an immense amount of politico-economic powers. At the same time, it is subject to antitrust laws and relevant from a contemporary and prospective separation of powers’ viewpoint. Antitrust could, in the end, contribute to the separation of powers in the digital era and, ultimately, to trust. Antitrust for trust, or the ultimate apparent antitrust paradox.
The contribution of antitrust de lege lata to the separation of powers is rather limited. A role should nevertheless be granted to specific legislation, regulation or practices and, possibly, antitrust de lege ferenda, especially with respect to the control of the digital infrastructure of democracy, the prohibition of distortions of the electoral and democratic process, the conclusion of certain governmental contracts with large or, a fortiori, dominant platforms, as well as the regulation and deconcentration or decentralization of artificial intelligence and the Metaverse. Artificial intelligence and, notably, machine learning based on data face a cycle of concentration accentuating the need for regulation. Deconcentration or decentralization may be envisaged, imposed or incentivized. Furthermore, limits are especially necessary when substantial autonomous powers are granted to forms of artificial intelligence. The Metaverse, for its part, may reshape society, politics, and economy around the globe in the future. From an antitrust perspective, the Metaverse poses at least two main issues: antitrust on the Metaverse and antitrust in the Metaverse.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.