We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In France, the dominant conception of natural law echoes that of the Ancients, according to which the natural state of humanity is social. Men and their liberty reach their perfection in society. If it is being a citizen that makes a human being, then the rights of a person are those that are recognized for them by political society. The rights of the man are founded upon the rights of the citizen. The American Declaration of Independence, the state bills of rights and the Amendments to the Federal Constitution emerged in a different intellectual atmosphere. A conception of rights as “natural” was dominant in the period that led to the Declaration of Independence. This conception built on a tradition of constitutionalism that emerged in the American colonies in the seventeenth century. If rights are recognized only to the extent that they promote the public good, as is the case in France, then it is legitimate for the state to define the content and limits of freedom of expression. The natural rights philosophy dominant in the United States makes similar limitations illegitimate. Current First Amendment doctrine reflects these ideas.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.