We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter describes and analyses the traditional way adopted by Chinese banks to manage and incentivise bankers in the context of state ownership and intervention. It provides an overview of the modernisation reform of Chinese banks and argues that the essential factor that contributed to the successful reform was the predominant role of the state. The governance of banks was subject to state intervention, and bankers were identified and managed as state cadres. Therefore, bankers’ remuneration was administratively managed, and bankers were incentivised with the opportunity of political promotion. Reciprocally, the administration of remuneration and political incentives acted as a channel for state intervention in banks. However, this administrative and politicised approach was inconsistent with the principles of modern corporate governance, and reform to push forward the modernisation of bankers’ remuneration was considered necessary.
This chapter investigates the practices of remuneration and political incentives in major Chinese banks in recent years and the implementation of the regulatory initiatives. The investigation is split into two parts, focusing on SOCBs and listed JSCBs, respectively. Low remuneration level, weak pay-performance sensitivity, the lack of economic incentives, and the predominance of political incentives are the major features of the practices of SOCBs, which are consistent with the traditional administrative and politicised approach. It is found that the regulatory initiatives based on international principles are not effectively implemented; however, the requirements that enhance state intervention have been strictly followed. The majority of the listed JSCBs are connected to the central or local state through direct or indirect ownership. Political incentives also play an important role in these JSCBs. In contrast, remuneration incentives are effective in privately owned JSCBs.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.