Victims of electrical injury (EI) often experience injuries to the peripheral nervous system and neuromuscular damage that may diminish motor function, such as flexibility/dexterity. These difficulties may continue after rehabilitation due to the reorganization of muscle afferent projections during peripheral nerve regeneration. Therefore, understanding how patients with a history of thermal burn injuries perform on motoric measures is necessary to explain the impact neuromuscular damage has on both motor and non-motor tests of cognition. However, no studies have examined the impact of motor functioning on cognition in patients who experienced thermal and electrical injuries compared to an electrical shock injury. This study explored the impact of motor dysfunction and psychiatric distress measured by depression severity on psychomotor speed and executive test performances among EI patients with and without thermal burn injuries.

This cross-sectional study consisted of EI patients undergoing an outpatient neuropsychological evaluation, including tests of motor dexterity (Grooved Pegboard [GP]), psychomotor speed (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Coding, Trail Making Test [TMT] Part A), and executive functioning (Stroop Color and Word Test [SCWT] Color-Word trial, TMT Part B). The sample was 83% male and 17% female, 88% White, 3% Black, 5% Hispanic, and 2% other race/ethnicity, with a mean age of 43.9 years (SD=11.36), mean education of 12.9 years (SD=2.05), and mean depression severity of 20.05 (SD=12.59) on the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Exclusion criteria were: 1) injury history of moderate-to-severe head trauma, 2) >2 performance validity test failures, and 3) any amputation of the upper extremity. Regression analyses included GP T-Scores for dominant hand and BDI-II total score as independent variables and neuropsychological normative test data as dependent variables.

Among validly performing patients with EI (n=86), regression analyses revealed GP performance accounted for significant variance (R2 =.153-.169) on all neuropsychological measures. Among EI patients with burn injuries (n=50), regression analyses revealed GP performance accounted for significant variance (R2 =.197-.266) on all neuropsychological measures. Among EI patients without burn injuries (n=36), analyses revealed that neither GP performance nor BDI-II severity accounted for significant variance across the neurocognitive tests (R2=.056-.142). Furthermore, among EI patients with burn injuries and the total sample, regression analyses revealed depression severity negatively predicted GP performance (R2 =.099-.13), however, in patients without burn injuries, depression did not predict GP performance (R2 =.052).

Overall, results showed that GP performance is a significant predictor of neurocognitive performance on both motor and non-motor measures in EI patients with burn injuries. Therefore, among EI patients with burn injuries, GP performance may have potential utility as an early indicator of injury severity, considering that it predicts neuropsychological test performance on measures of psychomotor speed and executive functioning. Lastly, depression predicted GP performance within the burn injury sample illustrating that psychological distress may negatively impact motor functionality.

Electrical injury (EI) is a significant, multifaceted trauma often with multi-domain cognitive sequelae, even when the expected current path does not pass through the brain. Chronic pain (CP) research suggests pain may affect cognition directly and indirectly by influencing emotional distress which then impacts cognitive functioning. As chronic pain may be critical to understanding EI-related cognitive difficulties, the aims of the current study were: examine the direct and indirect effects of pain on cognition following EI and compare the relationship between pain and cognition in EI and CP populations.

This cross-sectional study used data from a clinical sample of 50 patients with EI (84.0% male; M age = 43.7 years) administered standardized measures of pain (Pain Patient Profile), depression, and neurocognitive functioning. A CP comparison sample of 93 patients was also included.

Higher pain levels were associated with poorer attention/processing speed and executive functioning performance among patients with EI. Depression was significantly correlated with pain and mediated the relationship between pain and attention/processing speed in patients with EI. When comparing the patients with EI and CP, the relationship between pain and cognition was similar for both clinical groups.

Findings indicate that pain impacts mood and cognition in patients with EI, and the influence of pain and its effect on cognition should be considered in the assessment and treatment of patients who have experienced an electrical injury.

Although death due to electrical injury and lightning are rare in children, these injuries are often preventable. Twenty years ago, most injuries occurred at home, precipitated by oral contact with electrical cords, contact with wall sockets and faulty electrical equipment. We sought to assess the epidemiology of electrical injuries in children presenting to Emergency Departments (EDs) that participate in the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP).

This study is a retrospective review of electrical and lightning injury data from CHIRPP. The study population included children and youth aged 0-19 presenting to participating CHIRPP EDs from 1997-2010. Age, sex, year, setting, circumstance and disposition were extracted. Variables were tested using Fisher’s exact test and simple linear regression.

The dataset included 1183 electrical injuries, with 84 (7%) resulting in hospitalization. Most events occurred at home in the 2-5 year age group and affected the hands. Since 1997 there has been a gradual decrease in the number of electrical injuries per year (p<0.01) and there is an annual surge in electrical injuries over the summer (p<0.01). Forty-six percent of injuries involved electrical outlets, 65% of injuries involved some sort of electrical equipment. Injuries due to lightning were rare (n=19). No deaths were recorded in the database.

Despite the decrease in the number of electrical injuries per year, a large portion of injuries still appear to be preventable. Further research should focus on effective injury prevention strategies.