Emergency department (ED) visits for epilepsy are common, costly, and often clinically unnecessary. Configuration of care pathways (CPs) that could divert people away from ED offer an alternative. The aim was to measure patient and carer preferences for alternative CPs and to explore the feasibility of implementing the preferred CPs in the National Health Service (NHS) England with a wider group of stakeholders.

Formative work (provider survey, service-user interviews, knowledge exchange, and think-aloud piloting) informed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with six attributes: access to care plan, conveyance, time, epilepsy specialist today, general practitioner (GP) notification, and epilepsy specialist follow-up. This was hosted online with random assignment to two of three scenarios (home, public, or atypical). Logistic regression generated preference weights that were used to calculate the utility of CPs. The highest ranked CPs plus a status quo were discussed at three online knowledge exchange workshops. The nominal group technique was used to ascertain stakeholder views on preference evidence and to seek group consensus on optimal feasible alternatives.

A sample of 427 people with epilepsy and 167 friends or family completed the survey. People with epilepsy preferred paramedics to have access to care plan, non-conveyance, one to three hours, epilepsy specialists today, GP notification, and specialist follow-up within two to three weeks. Family and friends differed when considering atypical seizures, favoring conveyance to urgent treatment centers and shorter time. Optimal configuration of services from service users’ perspectives outranked current practice. Knowledge exchange (n=27 participants) identified the optimal CP as feasible but identified two scenarios for resource reallocation: care plan substitutes specialist advice today and times of strain on NHS resources.

Preferences differed to current practice but had minimal variation by seizure type or stakeholder. This study clearly identified optimal and feasible alternative CPs. The mixed-methods approach allowed for robust measurement of preferences, whilst knowledge exchange examined feasibility to enhance implementation of optimal alternative CPs in the future.

The purpose of this study was to explore overall recovery time and post-concussive symptoms (PCSS) of pediatric concussion patients who were referred to a specialty concussion clinic after enduring a protracted recovery (>28 days). This included patients who self-deferred care or received management from another provider until recovery became complicated. It was hypothesized that protracted recovery patients, who initiated care within a specialty concussion clinic, would have similar recovery outcomes as typical acute injury concussion patients (i.e., within 3 weeks).

Retrospective data were gathered from electronic medical records of concussion patients aged 6-19 years. Demographic data were examined based on age, gender, race, concussion history, and comorbid psychiatric diagnosis. Concussion injury data included days from injury to initial clinic visit, total visits, PCSS scores, days from injury to recovery, and days from initiating care with a specialty clinic to recovery. All participants were provided standard return-to-learn and return-to-play protocols, aerobic exercise recommendations, behavioral health recommendations, personalized vestibular/ocular motor rehabilitation exercises, and psychoeducation on the expected recovery trajectory of concussion.

52 patients were included in this exploratory analysis (Mean age 14.6, SD ±2.7; 57.7% female; 55.7% White, 21.2% Black or African American, 21.2% Hispanic). Two percent of our sample did not disclose their race or ethnicity. Prior concussion history was present in 36.5% of patients and 23.1% had a comorbid psychiatric diagnosis. The patient referral distribution included emergency departments (36%), local pediatricians (26%), neurologists (10%), other concussion clinics (4%), and self-referrals (24%).

Given the nature of our specialty concussion clinic sample, the data was not normally distributed and more likely to be skewed by outliers. As such, the median value and interquartile range were used to describe the results. Regarding recovery variables, the median days to clinic from initial injury was 50.0 (IQR=33.5-75.5) days, the median PCSS score at initial visit was 26.0 (IQR=10.0-53.0), and the median overall recovery time was 81.0 (IQR=57.0-143.3) days.

After initiating care within our specialty concussion clinic, the median recovery time was 21.0 (IQR=14.0-58.0) additional days, the median total visits were 2.0 (IQR=2.0-3.0), and the median PCSS score at follow-up visit was 7.0 (IQR=1-17.3).

Research has shown that early referral to specialty concussion clinics may reduce recovery time and the risk of protracted recovery. Our results extend these findings to suggest that patients with protracted recovery returned to baseline similarly to those with an acute concussion injury after initiating specialty clinic care. This may be due to the vast number of resources within specialty concussion clinics including tailored return-to-learn and return-to-play protocols, rehabilitation recommendations consistent with research, and home exercises that supplement recovery. Future studies should compare outcomes of protracted recovery patients receiving care from a specialty concussion clinic against those who sought other forms of treatment. Further, evaluating the influence of comorbid factors (e.g., psychiatric and/or concussion history) on pediatric concussion recovery trajectories may be useful for future research.

The COVID-19 pandemic increased food insufficiency: a severe form of food insecurity. Drawing on an ecological framework, we aimed to understand factors that contributed to changes in food insufficiency from April to December 2020, in a large urban population hard hit by the pandemic.

We conducted internet surveys every 2 weeks in April–December 2020, including a subset of items from the Food Insecurity Experience Scale. Longitudinal analysis identified predictors of food insufficiency, using fixed effects models.

Los Angeles County, which has a diverse population of 10 million residents.

A representative sample of 1535 adults in Los Angeles County who are participants in the Understanding Coronavirus in America tracking survey.

Rates of food insufficiency spiked in the first year of the pandemic, especially among participants living in poverty, in middle adulthood and with larger households. Government food assistance from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program was significantly associated with reduced food insufficiency over time, while other forms of assistance such as help from family and friends or stimulus funds were not.

The findings highlight that during a crisis, there is value in rapidly monitoring food insufficiency and investing in government food benefits.

Individuals living with severe mental illness can have significant emotional, physical and social challenges. Collaborative care combines clinical and organisational components.

We tested whether a primary care-based collaborative care model (PARTNERS) would improve quality of life for people with diagnoses of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or other psychoses, compared with usual care.

We conducted a general practice-based, cluster randomised controlled superiority trial. Practices were recruited from four English regions and allocated (1:1) to intervention or control. Individuals receiving limited input in secondary care or who were under primary care only were eligible. The 12-month PARTNERS intervention incorporated person-centred coaching support and liaison work. The primary outcome was quality of life as measured by the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA).

We allocated 39 general practices, with 198 participants, to the PARTNERS intervention (20 practices, 116 participants) or control (19 practices, 82 participants). Primary outcome data were available for 99 (85.3%) intervention and 71 (86.6%) control participants. Mean change in overall MANSA score did not differ between the groups (intervention: 0.25, s.d. 0.73; control: 0.21, s.d. 0.86; estimated fully adjusted between-group difference 0.03, 95% CI −0.25 to 0.31; P = 0.819). Acute mental health episodes (safety outcome) included three crises in the intervention group and four in the control group.

There was no evidence of a difference in quality of life, as measured with the MANSA, between those receiving the PARTNERS intervention and usual care. Shifting care to primary care was not associated with increased adverse outcomes.

Healthcare workers (HCWs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are disproportionately affected by severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To characterize factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity among LTCF HCWs, we performed a retrospective cohort study among HCWs in 32 LTCFs in the Minneapolis–St Paul region.

We analyzed the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity among LTCF HCWs during weeks 34–52 of 2020. LTCF and HCW-level characteristics, including facility size, facility risk score for resident-HCW contact, and resident-facing job role, were modeled in univariable and multivariable generalized linear regressions to determine their association with SARS-CoV-2 positivity.

Between weeks 34 and 52, 440 (20.7%) of 2,130 unique HCWs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at least once. In the univariable model, non–resident-facing HCWs had lower odds of infection (odds ratio [OR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36–0.70). In the multivariable model, the odds remained lower for non–resident-facing HCW (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36–0.71), and those in medium- versus low-risk facilities experienced higher odds of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.08–2.02).

Our findings suggest that COVID-19 cases are related to contact between HCW and residents in LTCFs. This association should be considered when formulating infection prevention and control policies to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in LTCFs.

Sudden onset severe headache is usually caused by a primary headache disorder but may be secondary to a more serious problem, such as subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Very few patients who present to hospital with headache have suffered a SAH, but early identification is important to improve patient outcomes. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the clinical effectiveness of different care pathways for the management of headache, suspicious for SAH, in the Emergency Department. Capturing the perspective of patients was an important part of the research.

The project team included a patient collaborator with experience of presenting to the Emergency Department with sudden onset severe headache. Three additional patients were recruited to our advisory group. The patient's perspective was collected at various points through the project including at team meetings, during protocol development and when interpreting the results of the systematic review and drawing conclusions.

Patients were reassured by the very high diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) for detecting SAH. Patients and clinicians emphasized the importance of shared decision making about whether to undergo additional tests to rule out SAH, after a negative CT result. When lumbar puncture was necessary, patients expressed a preference to have it on an ambulatory basis; further research on the safety and acceptability of ambulatory lumbar puncture was recommended.

Patient input at the protocol development stage helped researchers understand the patient experience and highlighted important outcomes for assessment. Patient involvement added context to the review findings and highlighted the preferences of patients regarding the management of headache.

Sudden onset severe headache is usually caused by a primary headache disorder but occasionally is secondary to a more serious problem, such as subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Guidelines recommend non-contrast brain computed tomography (CT) followed by lumbar puncture (LP) to exclude SAH. However, guidelines pre-date the introduction of more sensitive modern CT scanners. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the clinical effectiveness of different care pathways for the management of headache in the Emergency Department.

Eighteen databases (including MEDLINE and Embase) were searched to February 2020. Studies were quality assessed using criteria relevant to the study design; most studies were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool for diagnostic accuracy studies. Where sufficient information was reported, diagnostic accuracy data were extracted into 2 × 2 tables to calculate sensitivity, specificity, false-positive and false-negative rates. Where possible, hierarchical bivariate meta-analysis was used to synthesize results, otherwise studies were synthesized narratively.

Fifty-one studies were included in the review. Eight studies assessing the accuracy of the Ottawa SAH clinical decision rule were pooled; sensitivity was 99.5 percent, specificity was 23.7 percent. The high false positive rate suggests that 76.3 percent SAH-negative patients would undergo further investigation unnecessarily. Four studies assessing the accuracy of CT within six hours of headache onset were pooled; sensitivity was 98.7 percent, specificity was 100 percent. CT sensitivity beyond six hours was considerably lower (≤90%; 2 studies). Three studies assessing LP following negative CT were pooled; sensitivity was 100 percent, specificity was 95.2 percent. LP-related adverse events were reported in 5.3–9.5 percent of patients.

The evidence suggests that the Ottawa SAH Rule is not sufficiently accurate for ruling out SAH and does little to aid clinical decision making. Modern CT within six hours of headache onset (with images assessed by a neuroradiologist) is highly accurate, but sensitivity reduces considerably over time. The CT-LP pathway is highly sensitive for detecting SAH, although LP resulted in some false-positives and adverse events.

The impacts of COVID-19 for people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may be considerable. Online cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) programmes provide scalable access to psychological interventions, although the effectiveness of iCBT for OCD during COVID-19 has not been evaluated.

This study investigated the uptake and effectiveness of iCBT for OCD (both self- and clinician-guided courses) during the first 8 months of the pandemic in Australia (March to October 2020) and compared outcomes with the previous year.

1,343 adults (824/1343 (61.4%) female, mean age 33.54 years, SD = 12.00) commenced iCBT for OCD (1061 during the pandemic and 282 in the year before) and completed measures of OCD (Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale) and depression (Patient Health Questionaire-9) symptom severity, psychological distress (Kessler-10), and disability (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule) pre- and post-treatment.

During COVID-19, there was a 522% increase in monthly course registrations compared with the previous year, with peak uptake observed between April and June 2020 (a 1191% increase compared with April to June 2019). OCD and depression symptom severity were similar for the COVID and pre-COVID groups, although COVID-19 participants were more likely to enrol in self-guided courses (versus clinician-guided). In both pre- and during-COVID groups, the OCD iCBT course was associated with medium effect size reductions in OCD (g = 0.65–0.68) and depression symptom severity (g = 0.56–0.65), medium to large reductions in psychological distress (g = 0.77–0.83) and small reductions in disability (g = 0.35–.50).

Results demonstrate the considerable uptake of online psychological services for those experiencing symptoms of OCD during COVID-19 and highlight the scalability of effective digital mental health services.

To evaluate the effect of the burden of Staphylococcus aureus colonization of nursing home residents on the risk of S. aureus transmission to healthcare worker (HCW) gowns and gloves.

Multicenter prospective cohort study.

Residents and HCWs from 13 community-based nursing homes in Maryland and Michigan.

Residents were cultured for S. aureus at the anterior nares and perianal skin. The S. aureus burden was estimated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction detecting the nuc gene. HCWs wore gowns and gloves during usual care activities; gowns and gloves were swabbed and then cultured for the presence of S. aureus.

In total, 403 residents were enrolled; 169 were colonized with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and comprised the study population; 232 were not colonized and thus were excluded from this analysis; and 2 were withdrawn prior to being swabbed. After multivariable analysis, perianal colonization with S. aureus conferred the greatest odds for transmission to HCW gowns and gloves, and the odds increased with increasing burden of colonization: adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.1 (95% CI, 1.3–3.5) for low-level colonization and aOR 5.2 (95% CI, 3.1–8.7) for high level colonization.

Among nursing home patients colonized with S. aureus, the risk of transmission to HCW gowns and gloves was greater from those colonized with greater quantities of S. aureus on the perianal skin. Our findings inform future infection control practices for both MRSA and MSSA in nursing homes.