Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T17:25:46.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Submit content

Help address this Question with your content Submit Content

What are the ultimate limits of photonic quantum memories?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2023

Mustafa Gündoğan Open the ORCID record for Mustafa Gündoğan [Opens in a new window]  and
Daniel K.L. Oi Open the ORCID record for Daniel K.L. Oi [Opens in a new window]
Mustafa Gündoğan*
Affiliation:
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Daniel K.L. Oi
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mustafa Gündoğan, Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Photonic quantum memories are required in many applications in quantum information science with varying performance requirements depending on specific applications. Although classical light storage has been demonstrated in time scales of minutes (Dudin et al., 2013; Heinze et al., 2013) to hours (Ma et al., 2021) in different systems, storing true single photons and single photon level coherent pulses are still limited to around a few seconds at most (Wang et al., 2021; Ortu et al., 2022; Hain et al., 2022; Stas et al., 2022). In this question, we would like to explore what the challenges for quantum memory storage for the purposes of quantum communication and the distribution of entanglement are, e.g. in quantum repeaters. Furthermore, recent work has proposed using quantum memories with hour-long storage times for quantum computation (Gouzien and Sangouard, 2021) and physically transporting single photons for astronomical interferometry (Bland-Hawthorn et al., 2021) and global quantum communications (Wittig et al., 2017; Gündoğan et al., 2023).

Type
Question
Information
Research Directions: Quantum Technologies , Volume 1 , 2023 , e8
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Context

Photonic quantum memories are required in many applications in quantum information science with varying performance requirements depending on specific applications. Although classical light storage has been demonstrated in time scales of minutes (Dudin et al., Reference Dudin, Li and Kuzmich2013; Heinze et al., Reference Heinze, Hubrich and Halfmann2013) to hours (Ma et al., Reference Ma, Ma and Zhou2021) in different systems, storing true single photons and single photon level coherent pulses are still limited to around a few seconds at most (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Yang and Sun2021; Ortu et al., Reference Ortu, Holzäpfel and Etesse2022; Hain et al., Reference Hain, Stabel and Halfmann2022; Stas et al., Reference Stas, Huan and Machielse2022). In this question, we would like to explore what the challenges for quantum memory storage for the purposes of quantum communication and the distribution of entanglement are, e.g. in quantum repeaters. Furthermore, recent work has proposed using quantum memories with hour-long storage times for quantum computation (Gouzien and Sangouard, Reference Gouzien and Sangouard2021) and physically transporting single photons for astronomical interferometry (Bland-Hawthorn et al., Reference Bland-Hawthorn, Sellars and Bartholomew2021) and global quantum communications (Wittig et al., Reference Wittig, Wittig and Berquanda2017; Gündoğan et al., Reference Gündoğan, Sidhu, Oi and Krutzik2023).

For example, what are the intrinsic and technical limitations to reach ultra-long storage times limited with or close to material T1 times? These limitations could arise from a variety of sources for different physical systems: accumulating pulse errors in dynamical decoupling sequences, magnetic field alignment sensitivity, optical and magnetic field inhomogeneities, narrow-band spectral filtering, charge instabilities due to nanofabrication processes and vacuum quality. In the longer term, how can quantum information processing and computational techniques, such as fault tolerant error correction, be incorporated into photonic memory systems? This question seeks answers whether (and to what extent if yes) these issues can be addressed to reach ultra-long lifetime quantum memories.

How to contribute to this Question

If you believe you can contribute to answering this Question with your research outputs find out how to submit in the Instructions for authors (https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/research-directions-quantum-technologies/information/author-instructions/preparing-your-materials. This journal publishes Results, Analyses, Impact papers and additional content such as preprints and “grey literature”. Questions will be closed when the editors agree that enough has been published to answer the Question so before submitting, check if this is still an active Question. If it is closed, another relevant Question may be currently open, so do review all the open Questions in your field. For any further queries check the information pages (https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/research-directions-quantum-technologies/information/about-this-journal) or contact this email ().

Competing interests

The authors declare none.

References

Bland-Hawthorn, J, Sellars, MJ and Bartholomew, JG (2021) Quantum memories and the double-slit experiment: implications for astronomical interferometry. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 38, A86–A98. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.424651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudin, YO, Li, L and Kuzmich, A (2013) Light storage on the time scale of a minute. Physical Review A 87, 031801(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.031801 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouzien, É and Sangouard, N (2021) Factoring 2048-bit RSA integers in 177 days with 13 436 qubits and a multimode memory. Physical Review Letters 127, 14503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.140503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gündoğan, M, Sidhu, JS, Oi, DKL and Krutzik, M (2023) Time-delayed single quantum repeater node for global quantum communications with a single satellite. arXiv:2303.04174.Google Scholar
Hain, M, Stabel, M and Halfmann, T (2022) Few-photon storage on a second timescale by electromagnetically induced transparency in a doped solid. New Journal of Physics 24, 023012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac4ef4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, G, Hubrich, C and Halfmann, T (2013) Stopped light and image storage by electromagnetically induced transparency up to the regime of one minute. Physical Review Letters 111, 033601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.033601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Y, Ma, YZ, Zhou, ZQ et al. (2021) One-hour coherent optical storage in an atomic frequency comb memory. Nature Communication 12, 2381. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22706-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortu, A, Holzäpfel, A, Etesse, J et al. (2022) Storage of photonic time-bin qubits for up to 20 ms in a rare-earth doped crystal. npj Quantum Information 8, 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-022-00541-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stas, P-J, Huan, YQ, Machielse, B, et al. (2022) Robust multi-qubit quantum network node with integrated error detection. Science 378, 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add9771 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, X-J, Yang, S-J, Sun, P-F et al. (2021) Cavity-enhanced atom-photon entanglement with subsecond lifetime. Physical Review Letters 126, 090501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.090501 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittig, SE, Wittig, SM, Berquanda, A, et al. (2017) Concept for single-satellite global quantum key distribution using a solid state quantum memory. IAC-17,B2,7,1,x36863Google Scholar