Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T22:47:10.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Association between cortical thickness or surface area and divergent thinking in patients with bipolar disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2024

Pei-Chi Tu*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan Institute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
Wan-Chen Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
Yi-Hsuan Kuan
Affiliation:
Institute of Brain Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
Mu-Hong Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan Institute of Brain Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
Tung-Ping Su
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan Institute of Brain Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan Department of Psychiatry, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
*
Corresponding author: Pei-Chi Tu; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Divergent thinking is a critical creative cognitive process. Its neural mechanisms have been well-studied through structural and functional imaging in healthy individuals but are less explored in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). Because of the traditional link between creativity and BD, this study investigated the structural correlates of divergent thinking in patients with BD through surface-based morphometry.

Methods:

Fifty-nine patients diagnosed with BD I or BD II (35.3 ± 8.5 years) and 56 age- and sex-matched controls (33.9 ± 7.4 years) were recruited. The participants underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging and an evaluation of divergent thinking by using the Chinese version of the Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults (ATTA). FreeSurfer 7.0 was used to generate thickness and surface area maps for each participant. Brainwise regression of the association between cortical thickness or surface area and ATTA performance was conducted using general linear models.

Results:

Divergent thinking performance did not differ significantly between the patients with BD and the healthy controls. In these patients, total ATTA score was negatively correlated with cortical thickness in the right middle frontal gyrus, right occipital, and left precuneus but positively correlated with the surface area of the right superior frontal gyrus. By contrast, total ATTA scores and cortical thickness or surface area were not significantly correlated among the controls.

Conclusion:

The findings indicate that divergent thinking involves cerebral structures for executive control, mental imagery, and visual processing in patients with BD, and the right prefrontal cortex might be the most crucial of these structures.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology

Significant outcomes

  • Divergent thinking involves cerebral structures for executive control, mental imagery, and visual processing in patients with bipolar disorder (BD).

  • The right prefrontal cortex might be the most crucial of these structures.

  • The present study identified a negative correlation between Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults score and the cortical thicknesses of the frontal, parietal, and occipital structures that cortical thinness indicates cortical efficiency.

Limitations

  • The participants with BD were receiving various dosages of antipsychotics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, and lithium. Therefore, the use of various psychotropics distinctly affects cortical thickness and surface area and should be considered a confounder in the present study.

Introduction

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a major psychiatric disorder characterised by the fluctuation of mood states and social function impairment. Although prominent cognitive impairment has been identified in patients with BD, evidence exists of a link between BD and creativity. Individuals in creative professions are more to have BD than are controls (Kyaga et al., Reference Kyaga, Landén, Boman, Hultman, Långström and Lichtenstein2013), and individuals with BD and their healthy first-degree relatives exhibit higher overall creative achievement than do healthy individuals (Richards et al., Reference Richards, Kinney, Lunde, Benet and Merzel1998). One study of 1558 participants found that a higher BD polygenic risk score was associated with not only increased divergent thinking performance but also higher grey matter volumes in the right inferior frontal gyrus (Takeuchi et al., Reference Takeuchi, Kimura, Tomita, Taki, Kikuchi, Ono, Yu, Matsudaira, Nouchi, Yokoyama, Kotozaki, Nakagawa, Hanawa, Iizuka, Sekiguchi, Araki, Miyauchi, Ikeda, Sakaki, dos S. Kawata, Nozawa, Yokota, Magistro, Imanishi and Kawashima2021). The aforementioned study suggested that genetic risk factors for BD also contributed to superior performance in divergent thinking and an increase in related cortical changes. Nevertheless, the results of studies evaluating the performance of noneminent creativity in patients with BD are less consistent, and results might depend on the measurements used in the experiments (Santosa et al., Reference Santosa, Strong, Nowakowska, Wang, Rennicke and Ketter2007).

One key measurement of creative cognitive processes is divergent thinking, which refers to the process of extrapolating many possible responses to an initial stimulus or data. Several functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have demonstrated that the posterior midline structures, including the precuneus or cuneus and posterior cingulate cortex, are critical for mental imagery and might also be important for divergent thinking (Cavanna & Trimble, Reference Cavanna and Trimble2006; Mayseless et al., Reference Mayseless, Eran and Shamay-Tsoory2015). Furthermore, a meta-analysis of fMRI studies found that divergent thinking activates a distributed network, including the lateral prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex, precuneus, anterior cingulate cortex, left middle temporal gyrus, and left fusiform gyrus (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Yang, Tong, Sun, Chen, Wei, Zhang, Zhang and Qiu2015). These functional studies indicate that divergent thinking might involve multiple cognitive process, including visual processing, verbal processing, mental imagery, and executive control.

The neural substrates for divergent thinking have also been revealed by evaluating the association between divergent thinking performance and cortical structures. In healthy individuals, several studies utilising voxel-based morphometry (VBM) have delineated a correlation between performance in divergent thinking tasks and grey matter volume, employing diverse metrics of divergent thinking. One investigation, employing the verbal imagination subscales of the Berliner Intelligenz-Struktur-Test, revealed a significant positive relationship between verbal creativity and grey matter density in the right cuneus and right precuneus (Fink et al., Reference Fink, Koschutnig and Hutterer2014). Another study, conducted by Jauk et al. (Reference Jauk, Neubauer, Dunst, Fink and Benedek2015), employed six distinct divergent thinking tasks, comprising three-alternate-use tasks and three-instance tasks, unveiling an association between ideational originality and grey matter volume in the precuneus and caudate nucleus (Jauk et al., Reference Jauk, Neubauer, Dunst, Fink and Benedek2015). Additionally, a study utilising the S-A creativity test (Minds, Reference Minds1969) detected positive correlations between individual creativity and regional grey matter volume in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, bilateral striatum, substantia nigra, tegmental ventral area, and periaqueductal grey (Takeuchi et al., Reference Takeuchi, Taki, Sassa, Hashizume, Sekiguchi, Fukushima and Kawashima2010). Moreover, another investigation employing the verbal version of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking found a significant positive correlation between verbal creativity and regional grey matter volume in the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (Zhu et al., Reference Zhu, Zhang and Qiu2013). Several surface-based morphometry (SBM) studies have demonstrated further association between divergent thinking performance and cortical thickness or surface area. One study demonstrated that divergent thinking measured using the composite creativity index was negatively correlated with cortical thickness within the lingual gyrus and positively correlated with cortical thickness in the right posterior cingulate (Jung et al., Reference Jung, Segall, Jeremy Bockholt, Flores, Smith, Chavez and Haier2010). Another study of 310 healthy adults found that visual creativity was significantly negatively correlated with cortical thickness in the left middle frontal gyrus, right inferior frontal gyrus, right supplementary motor cortex, and left insula (Tian et al., Reference Tian, Chen, Zhu, Wang, Yang, Zhu, Tian, Zhang, Cao and Qiu2018). The aforementioned VBM and SBM studies support the importance of distributed neural substrates, including the cuneus, precuneus, and prefrontal regions, in the neural processing of divergent thinking in healthy individuals.

Few functional and structural studies have been conducted on divergent thinking in patients with BD, and whether patients with BD and healthy individuals share similar neural networks for creative thinking is unclear. Our VBM study found that divergent thinking performance was positively correlated with the grey matter volume of the dorsal part of the right medial prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 9) in patients with BD, and the study emphasised the importance of cognitive control in creative thinking (Tu et al., Reference Tu, Kuan, Li and Su2017). The present study used SBM to investigate the association between divergent thinking performance and cortical thickness or surface area in patients with BD. Cortical thickness and surface area are two independent properties of grey matter and might contribute differently to individual differences in behaviour, as demonstrated in a previous study (Kubera et al., Reference Kubera, Schmitgen, Maier-Hein, Thomann, Hirjak and Wolf2018). We undertook the same analysis of a group of healthy controls (HCs) to understand whether patients with BD and HCs shared the same structural correlates of creative thinking. In the present investigation, we implemented a verbal test designed to assess divergent thinking, the outcomes of which have previously been linked with the prefrontal cortex in extant literature. Consequently, our hypothesis posits that there exists an association between the performance on divergent thinking tasks and the cortical thickness or surface area of the prefrontal cortex among individuals diagnosed with BD. Furthermore, we anticipate observing differential patterns of structural association between divergent thinking and brain morphology among HCs as revealed by our VBM analysis.

Materials and methods

Participants

The BD group comprised 59 outpatients with a diagnosis of BD I or BD II from the Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan (Table 1). Diagnoses were confirmed through structured clinical interviews according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition (DSM-IV) (First et al., Reference First, Spitzer, Gibbon and Janet1997). Participants were screened to exclude those with a history of head injury resulting in a sustained loss of consciousness or cognitive sequelae, neurological illness, or any disorder affecting cerebral metabolism. Mood symptom severity was evaluated by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDR-17) (Hamilton, Reference Hamilton1960) and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) (Young et al., Reference Young, Biggs, Ziegler and Meyer1978). Patients meeting the criteria for euthymic state, defined by a score of <7 on the HDR-17 and a score of <7 on the YMRS, were enrolled. The patients were receiving treatment with various atypical antipsychotics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, and lithium before participation in the experiment (Table 1). A total of 56 age-, sex-, and handedness-matched HCs were recruited through advertisement. These participants were screened using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus (Sheehan et al., Reference Sheehan, Lecrubier, Sheehan, Amorim, Janavs, Weiller, Hergueta, Baker and Dunbar1998). In addition, those with first-degree relatives with Axis I disorders, including schizophrenia, major depression, or BD, were excluded. A total of 131 participants were initially enrolled in the study, comprising 65 individuals diagnosed with BD and 66 HCs. Subsequently, 16 participants were excluded due to failure to meet the research criteria, incomplete evaluation processes, or insufficient image quality. Consequently, the final cohort for data analysis comprised 59 patients with BD and 56 HCs (detailed enrolment process in Supplementary Figure 1). All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and all participants provided written informed consent after they were apprised of the experimental procedures.

Table 1. The demographic data and behavioural performance of participants in this study

BD = bipolar disorder; HC = healthy control; M = Male; F = Female; SD = standard deviation; YMRS = Young Mania Rating Scale; HDRS-17 = 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; ATTA = Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults.

Measurement of divergent thinking

We adopted the Chinese version of the Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults (ATTA) (Goff & Torrance, Reference Goff and Torrance2002), which was edited by Chen (Reference Chen2006), for evaluating divergent thinking. The test includes one verbal and two figural responses. During the test, participants were encouraged to devise novel responses to verbal or figurative stimuli. The four norm-referenced measures were as follows: (1) fluency, the ability to produce quantities of ideas relevant to the task instruction; (2) originality, the ability to produce uncommon ideas or ideas that are completely new or unique; (3) elaboration, the ability to embellish ideas with details; and (4) flexibility, the ability to process information or objects in different ways when provided the same stimulus. We used the creativity index, which was calculated from the 4 norm-referenced measures and 15 criterion-referenced creativity indicators, to conduct our main regression in this study.

Image acquisition

Images were acquired using a whole-body, high-speed MRI system (3.0T GE Discovery MR750). Head stabilisation was achieved with cushioning, and all participants wore earplugs (29-dB rating) to attenuate any noise. A high-resolution structural image was acquired in the sagittal plane by using a high-resolution sequence (repetition time = 8.38 ms, echo time = 3.54 ms, inversion time = 450 ms, and flip angle = 12°) and an isotropic 1-mm voxel (field of view = 256 × 256).

Analysis of cortical thickness and surface area

All structural T1 images were analysed using FreeSurfer (version 7.0, www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/martinos) to create anatomical surface models and for statistical analyses (Dale et al., Reference Dale, Fischl and Sereno1999; Fischl et al., Reference Fischl, Sereno and Dale1999a, Reference Fischl, Sereno, Tootell and Dale199b). For each participant, the processing stream included the removal of nonbrain tissue, transformation to Talairach space, and segmentation of grey–white matter tissue. The thickness measurements across the cortex were computed by determining the point on the grey–white matter boundary surface closest to a given point on the estimated pial surface (and vice versa) and averaging these two values (Fischl & Dale, Reference Fischl and Dale2000). The accuracy of the thickness measurements derived using this technique has been validated using histological (Rosas et al., Reference Rosas, Liu, Hersch, Glessner, Ferrante, Salat, van der Kouwe, Jenkins, Dale and Fischl2002) and manual measurements (Kuperberg et al., Reference Kuperberg, Broome, McGuire, David, Eddy, Ozawa, Goff, West, Williams, van der Kouwe, Salat, Dale and Fischl2003). To map each participant to a common space, the surface representing the grey–white matter boundary was registered to an average cortical surface atlas by using a nonlinear procedure that optimally aligned sulcal and gyral features among the participants (Fischl et al., Reference Fischl, Sereno and Dale1999a, Reference Fischl, Sereno, Tootell and Dale1999b). For vertex-by-vertex cluster analysis, the thickness or surface area maps of all participants in both groups were converted to a common atlas space (Fisch et al., Reference Fischl, Sereno and Dale1999a, Reference Fischl, Sereno, Tootell and Dale1999b). The data were smoothed by applying a two-dimensional Gaussian smoothing kernel with a size of 10 mm. With regard to quality control of MRI images and cortical segmentations, we adopted the strategy of visual inspection with exclusion that excluded images with artefacts or segmentation failures. In this study, the MRI images of 116 participants (60 patients with BD and 56 HCs) were evaluated, and the images of 1 patient with BD were excluded due to quality control.

Statistical analyses

We employed the query, design, estimate, and contrast analysis tool integrated within the FreeSurfer software to perform group-level statistical analyses. This tool provides researchers with a robust platform for investigating brain morphometric differences associated with diverse experimental factors and clinical conditions using structural MRI data within the FreeSurfer environment. Our main analysis investigated the structural correlates of divergent thinking in patients with BD. A general linear model was used to analyse the correlation between cortical thickness or surface area and ATTA scores by using age, education, and intracranial volume as covariates of no interest. We used an uncorrected threshold of p < 0.01 for initial vertex-wise comparisons. To correct for multiple comparisons, Monte Carlo simulations were performed 10 000 times. At the cluster level, only clusters with a significance of p < 0.05 were reported. The correlation between divergent thinking and cortical thickness or surface area was analysed separately for the patients with BD and the HCs in the main analysis. We also performed a supplementary analysis of the correlations of the four norm-referenced measures of fluency, elaboration, originality, and flexibility with cortical thickness or surface area to understand whether different components of divergent thinking involved different cortical structures.

Results

The demographic and behavioural data of the participants are presented in Table 1. The total ATTA scores and the ATTA scores for the four norm-referenced measures did not differ significantly between the patients with BD and the HCs.

In the patients with BD, ATTA score correlated negatively with the cortical thicknesses of the right middle frontal, right lateral occipital, and left precuneus (Fig. 1, Table 2). By contrast, ATTA score correlated positively with the surface area of the right superior frontal gyrus (Fig. 2, Table 2). In the HCs, ATTA score did not correlate significantly with cortical thickness or surface area. In the study, evaluations of ATTA were conducted prior to image acquisition within the same week, with an average interval of 4 days.

Table 2. The cortical structures showing significant correlations between performance of divergent thinking and cortical thickness or surface areas in patients with bipolar disorder and controls

ATTA = Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults; Max = maximum voxel-wise significance in cluster; TalX, TalY, TalZ = Talairach coordinate of maximum; BD = bipolar disorder; HC = healthy control.

Figure 1. Cortical thickness correlates of divergent thinking measured by Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults (ATTA) in patients with bipolar disorder and healthy controls. In patients with bipolar disorder, total ATTA score was negatively correlated with cortical thickness in the right middle frontal gyrus, right occipital, and left precuneus. In contrast, total ATTA scores and cortical thickness were not significantly correlated among the controls. BD = bipolar disorder; A = anterior; P = posterior.

Figure 2. Cortical surface area correlates of divergent thinking in patients with bipolar disorder and healthy controls. In patients with bipolar disorder, total Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults (ATTA) score was positively correlated with surface area of right superior frontal gyrus. In contrast, total ATTA scores and surface area were not significantly correlated among the controls.

We conducted supplementary analysis of the associations of the four norm-referenced measures with cortical thickness or surface area. In the patients with BD, these measures correlated negatively with cortical thickness in different cortical structures (Fig. 1, Table 2). The cortical thickness of the right rostral middle frontal gyrus correlated with originality, whereas that of the right lateral occipital cortex correlated with fluency. The surface area of the right superior frontal gyrus also correlated positively with elaboration, flexibility, and originality (Fig. 2, Table 2). In the HCs, originality and the cortical thicknesses of the right inferior frontal, occipital, and left insula were positively correlated (Fig. 1, Table 2).

In the patients with BD, we conducted further analysis to clarify the effects of psychosis history, BD subtype (I vs. II), age of onset, and illness duration on total ATTA score and the cortical thicknesses of the structures listed in Table 2. The results demonstrated that only illness duration exerted significant effects on total ATTA score and cortical thickness. Patients with BD with long illness duration exhibited significantly lower cortical thickness in the right lateral occipital cortex (t = 2.34, p = .02) than did patients with short illness duration; however, ATTA scores did not differ significantly between these two groups.

Additionally, we conducted between-group analyses examining cortical thickness and surface area difference between patients with BD and HCs utilising a general linear model. Covariates including age, gender, education, and intracranial volume were included as covariates of no interest. The findings revealed a significant decrease in cortical thickness within the left inferior temporal gyrus among BD patients compared to HCs (Supplementary Figure 2). Conversely, no significant differences in cortical surface area were evident between the two cohorts.

Discussion

This study used SBM to evaluate the association between divergent thinking performance and cortical thickness or surface area in patients with BD and identified that higher ATTA scores were associated with lower cortical thicknesses in the right rostral middle frontal gyrus, right occipital, and left precuneus but with a larger surface area in the right superior frontal gyrus. These findings suggest that divergent thinking involves the interaction of multiple networks for visual processing (occipital), mental image generation (precuneus), and executive control (prefrontal cortex). Because the correlations between cortical structure and behavioural performance were limited in our sample of HCs, the structural change in the pathogenesis of patients with BD might cause additional variation and be helpful in elucidating the neural process underlying divergent thinking.

The most significant correlation and largest cluster were obtained for the right rostral middle frontal gyrus. The right middle frontal gyrus is a key node of the executive control network, and our findings indicate that executive control might have a critical influence on divergent thinking performance in patients with BD. Studies have also provided evidence of the importance of the prefrontal cortex in creative thinking. The activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has been consistently demonstrated during divergent thinking tasks in two meta-analyses of fMRI studies (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Yang, Tong, Sun, Chen, Wei, Zhang, Zhang and Qiu2015; Cogdell-Brooke et al., Reference Cogdell‐Brooke, Sowden, Violante and Thompson2020). Furthermore, one study observed functional changes in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex caused by training in divergent thinking and suggested that the enhancement of creativity might rely not only on the posterior brain but also on areas involved in top-down cognitive control (Sun et al., Reference Sun, Chen, Zhang, Li, Li, Wei, Yang and Qiu2016). However, the relationship between prefrontal function and creativity might not be straightforward. For example, frontal damage caused by focal lesions or neurodegenerative diseases is associated with impairments in various creativity tasks. However, paradoxically, a series of clinical observations reported the facilitation of artistic production in patients with neurodegenerative diseases affecting the prefrontal cortex, such as frontotemporal dementia (de Souza et al., Reference de Souza, Guimarães, Teixeira, Caramelli, Levy, Dubois and Volle2014). Therefore, a complex relationship between prefrontal function and creativity might exist, and this aspect warrants further investigation.

We also found that divergent thinking performance was associated with the cortical thickness of the left precuneus in the patients with BD. The importance of the precuneus in divergent thinking was also supported by one study demonstrating that individuals with higher verbal creative ability exhibited lower regional functional homogeneity in the right precuneus and that the cortical volume and thickness of the right precuneus were positively associated with individual verbal creativity (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Xu, Yang, Li, Sun, Wang, Beaty, Zhang, Zuo and Qiu2015). The aforementioned results imply that individual differences in verbal creative thinking are reflected in the precuneus. The left precuneus is the core region of the default mode network, which is key to episodic memory retrieval and future simulation. Studies have highlighted the involvement of constructive episodic processes in creative cognition (Beaty et al., Reference Beaty, Thakral, Madore, Benedek and Schacter2018; Thakral et al., Reference Thakral, Madore, Kalinowski and Schacter2020) and have suggested that the default mode network is causally linked to creative thinking (Shofty et al., Reference Shofty, Gonen, Bergmann, Mayseless, Korn, Shamay-Tsoory, Grossman, Jalon, Kahn and Ram2022). In addition, one fMRI study identified stronger connectivity between the default mode network and a frontoparietal brain network linked to cognitive control during divergent thinking (Madore et al., Reference Madore, Thakral, Beaty, Addis and Schacter2017). Taken with our findings regarding the right rostral middle frontal gyrus and left precuneus, the aforementioned findings indicate that divergent thinking involves the cooperation of different functional networks and the default mode network in patients with BD.

The present study identified a negative correlation between ATTA score and the cortical thicknesses of the frontal, parietal, and occipital structures. One interpretation of this result is that cortical thinness indicates cortical efficiency. A developmental study found that superior attentional performance is associated with a thinner cortex in bilateral frontoparietal networks and that individuals with higher maturity (i.e. individuals with thinner cortexes in these regions) activate the frontoparietal attentional network to a greater extent (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Dapretto, O’Hare, Kan, McCourt, Thompson, Toga, Bookheimer and Sowell2009). Several studies have also reported a negative correlation between cortical thickness and divergent thinking performance in healthy individuals and have suggested that the development of cognitive capacity (including creative capacity) can be associated with low cortical thickness in discrete regions of the brain (Jung et al., Reference Jung, Segall, Jeremy Bockholt, Flores, Smith, Chavez and Haier2010; Tian et al., Reference Tian, Chen, Zhu, Wang, Yang, Zhu, Tian, Zhang, Cao and Qiu2018). However, patients with psychiatric disorders have cortical thinness in various cortical structures and also exhibit considerable impairments in cognitive functions requiring executive control, such as working memory. Therefore, the relationship between cortical thinness and brain function might be complex, and the finding that cortical thinness is associated with superior divergent thinking performance in patients with BD should be interpreted cautiously.

In contrast with its cortical thickness, the surface area of the right superior frontal gyrus was positively correlated with ATTA score. One study found that a high-creative-achievement group exhibited significantly larger cortical surface areas of the right postcentral gyrus and bilateral superior parietal area than did HCs (Chrysikou et al., Reference Chrysikou, Wertz, Yaden, Kaufman, Bacon, Wintering, Jung and Newberg2020). Another study found that professional comedians had larger cortical surface areas of the left inferior temporal gyrus, angular gyrus, precuneus, and right medial prefrontal cortex than did regular people (Brawer & Amir, Reference Brawer and Amir2021). Two studies demonstrated that patients with BD were associated with an increased cortical surface area of the pars triangularis (Yalin et al., Reference Yalin, Saricicek, Hidiroglu, Zugman, Direk, Ada, Cavusoglu, Er, Isik, Ceylan, Tunca, Kempton and Ozerdem2019; Woo et al., Reference Woo, Kang, Kang, Kim, Han, Tae and Ham2021). Therefore, increased surface area in the cortical structures of patients with BD might indicate a link between creativity and BD.

Several methodological limitations and alternative conceptualisations of our findings merit consideration. At first, the participants with BD were receiving various dosages of antipsychotics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, and lithium. A large-scale SBM study of patients with BD (1837 patients with BD, 2582 controls) found that increased cortical thickness and surface area were associated with taking lithium, reduced cortical thickness was associated with antiepileptic treatment, and reduced cortical surface area was associated with atypical antipsychotic treatment. The aforementioned study did not detect any significant change in cortical thickness or surface area associated with antidepressant treatment. Therefore, the use of various psychotropics distinctly affects cortical thickness and surface area and should be considered a confounder in the present study. Secondly, the study found no statistically significant difference in the performance on the ATTA between patients with BD and HCs. Our behavioural findings did not support the hypothesis that patients with BD exhibit superior performance in creative thinking. Consequently, it is suggested that measures of divergent thinking may not be appropriate for identifying biomarkers or differentiating diagnostic criteria for the disease. Thirdly, a major concern regarding the findings pertains to elucidating the varied structural correlates of divergent thinking, particularly in light of the absence of significant differences in behavioural performance. We posited that these findings could be ascribed to the reorganisation of brain function linked with prefrontal dysfunction in individuals with BD, although additional experimental evidence is necessary to substantiate our hypothesis. Finally, sex was not included as a nuisance covariate in our analysis based on evidence from prior studies suggesting that the majority of sex-related variations in neuroanatomical volume can be attributed to intracranial volume (Pintzka et al., Reference Pintzka, Hansen, Evensmoen and Håberg2015), and behavioural differences between sexes primarily relate to disparities in brain structure, largely influenced by variations in brain size (van Eijk et al., Reference van Eijk, Zhu, Couvy-Duchesne, Strike, Lee, Hansell, Thompson, de Zubicaray, McMahon, Wright and Zietsch2021; Eliot et al., Reference Eliot, Beery and Jacobs2023). Nonetheless, we conducted an additional analysis exploring the association between ATTA performance and cortical thickness/surface area with sex added as a covariate of no interest in patients with BD. While cortical surface area findings remained consistent, results for cortical thickness diverged significantly (detailed in Supplementary Table 1). Therefore, it is important to acknowledge that sex may potentially impact our findings, and interpretations of the study should be approached cautiously in this regard.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that divergent thinking involves multiple structures for executive control, mental imagery, and visual processing in patients with BD. The right prefrontal cortex exhibited the most significant correlation with behavioural performance in patients with BD, which might be attributable to its critical role in coordinating different cognitive process components during divergent thinking.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2024.17.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from Taiwan’s National Science and Technology Council (NSC-103-2314-B-075-065-MY2, NSC 102-2420-H-010-003, and NSC 103-2420-H-010-001) and Taipei Veterans General Hospital (V104C-128).

Author contribution

YHK and TPS initiated the study. PCT and WCC performed statistical analyses and data interpretation, under the supervision of TPS. TPS, MHC, and YHK collected data. All authors contributed to the data interpretation. PCT wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors edited and approved it for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval statement for work involving human subjects

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

References

Beaty, RE, Thakral, PP, Madore, KP, Benedek, M, Schacter, DL (2018) Core network contributions to remembering the past, imagining the future, and thinking creatively. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 30(12), 19391951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brawer, J and Amir, O (2021) Mapping the ‘funny bone’: neuroanatomical correlates of humor creativity in professional comedians. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 16(9), 915925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavanna, AE and Trimble, MR (2006) The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129(3), 564583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, CY (2006) Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults manual in Chinese Version. Taipei: Psychology Publisher.Google Scholar
Chen, Q-L, Xu, T, Yang, W-J, Li, Y-D, Sun, J-Z, Wang, K-C, Beaty, RE, Zhang, Q-L, Zuo, X-N, Qiu, J (2015) Individual differences in verbal creative thinking are reflected in the precuneus. Neuropsychologia 75, 441449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrysikou, EG, Wertz, C, Yaden, DB, Kaufman, SB, Bacon, D, Wintering, NA, Jung, RE, Newberg, AB (2020) Differences in brain morphometry associated with creative performance in high- and average-creative achievers. Neuroimage 218, 116921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cogdell‐Brooke, LS, Sowden, PT, Violante, R, Thompson, HE (2020) A meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of divergent thinking using activation likelihood estimation. Human Brain Mapping 41(17), 50575077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dale, AM, Fischl, B and Sereno, MI (1999) Cortical surface-based analysis: I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9(2), 179194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Souza, LC, Guimarães, HC, Teixeira, AL, Caramelli, P, Levy, R, Dubois, B, Volle, E (2014) Frontal lobe neurology and the creative mind. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eliot, L, Beery, AK, Jacobs, EG, et al. (2023) Why and how to account for sex and gender in brain and behavioral research. Journal of Neuroscience 43(37), 63446356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fink, A, Koschutnig, K, Hutterer, L, et al. (2014) Gray matter density in relation to different facets of verbal creativity. Brain Structure & Function 219(4), 12631269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Gibbon, M, Janet, BWW (1997) User’s Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders SCID-I: Clinician Version. American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
Fischl, B and Dale, AM (2000) Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America 97(20), 1105011055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischl, B, Sereno, MI and Dale, AM (1999a) Cortical surface-based analysis: ii: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 9(2), 195207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischl, B, Sereno, MI, Tootell, RBH, and Dale, AM (1999b). High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Human Brain Mapping 8, 272284.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, K and Torrance, EP (2002) Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M (1960) A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 23(1), 5662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jauk, E, Neubauer, AC, Dunst, B, Fink, A, Benedek, M (2015) Gray matter correlates of creative potential: a latent variable voxel-based morphometry study. Neuroimage 111, 312320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, RE, Segall, JM, Jeremy Bockholt, H, Flores, RA, Smith, SM, Chavez, RS, Haier, RJ (2010) Neuroanatomy of creativity. Human Brain Mapping 31(3), 398409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubera, KM, Schmitgen, MM, Maier-Hein, KH, Thomann, PA, Hirjak, D, Wolf, RC (2018) Differential contributions of cortical thickness and surface area to trait impulsivity in healthy young adults. Behavioural Brain Research 350, 6571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuperberg, GR, Broome, MR, McGuire, PK, David, AS, Eddy, M, Ozawa, F, Goff, D, West, WC, Williams, SCR, van der Kouwe, AJW, Salat, DH, Dale, AM, Fischl, B (2003) Regionally localized thinning of the cerebral cortex in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 60(9), 878888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyaga, S, Landén, M, Boman, M, Hultman, CM, Långström, N, Lichtenstein, P (2013) Mental illness, suicide and creativity: 40-year prospective total population study. Journal of Psychiatric Research 47(1), 8390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, LH, Dapretto, M, O’Hare, ED, Kan, E, McCourt, ST, Thompson, PM, Toga, AW, Bookheimer, SY, Sowell, ER (2009) Relationships between brain activation and brain structure in normally developing children. Cerebral Cortex 19(11), 25952604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madore, KP, Thakral, PP, Beaty, RE, Addis, DR, Schacter, DL (2017) Neural mechanisms of episodic retrieval support divergent creative thinking. Cerebral Cortex 29(1), 150166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayseless, N, Eran, A and Shamay-Tsoory, SG (2015) Generating original ideas: the neural underpinning of originality. Neuroimage 116, 232239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minds, S (1969) Manual of SA Creativity Test. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Shinri Corporation.Google Scholar
Pintzka, CWS, Hansen, TI, Evensmoen, HR, Håberg, AK (2015) Marked effects of intracranial volume correction methods on sex differences in neuroanatomical structures: a HUNT MRI study. Frontiers in Neuroscience 9, 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, R, Kinney, DK, Lunde, I, Benet, M, Merzel, APC (1988) Creativity in manic-depressives, cyclothymes, their normal relatives, and control subjects. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 97(3), 281288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosas, HD, Liu, AK, Hersch, S, Glessner, M, Ferrante, RJ, Salat, DH, van der Kouwe, A, Jenkins, BG, Dale, AM, Fischl, B (2002) Regional and progressive thinning of the cortical ribbon in Huntington’s disease. Neurology 58(5), 695701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santosa, CM, Strong, CM, Nowakowska, C, Wang, PW, Rennicke, CM, Ketter, TA (2007) Enhanced creativity in bipolar disorder patients: a controlled study. Journal of Affective Disorders 100(1-3), 3139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheehan, DV, Lecrubier, Y, Sheehan, KH, Amorim, P, Janavs, J, Weiller, E, Hergueta, T, Baker, R and Dunbar, GC (1998) The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 59, 2233.Google ScholarPubMed
Shofty, B, Gonen, T, Bergmann, E, Mayseless, N, Korn, A, Shamay-Tsoory, S, Grossman, R, Jalon, I, Kahn, I, Ram, Z (2022) The default network is causally linked to creative thinking. Molecular Psychiatry 27(3), 18481854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, J, Chen, Q, Zhang, Q, Li, Y, Li, H, Wei, D, Yang, W, Qiu, J (2016) Training your brain to be more creative: brain functional and structural changes induced by divergent thinking training. Human Brain Mapping 37(10), 33753387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takeuchi, H, Kimura, R, Tomita, H, Taki, Y, Kikuchi, Y, Ono, C, Yu, Z, Matsudaira, I, Nouchi, R, Yokoyama, R, Kotozaki, Y, Nakagawa, S, Hanawa, S, Iizuka, K, Sekiguchi, A, Araki, T, Miyauchi, CM, Ikeda, S, Sakaki, K, dos S. Kawata, KH, Nozawa, T, Yokota, S, Magistro, D, Imanishi, T, Kawashima, R (2021) Polygenic risk score for bipolar disorder associates with divergent thinking and brain structures in the prefrontal cortex. Human Brain Mapping 42(18), 60286037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takeuchi, H, Taki, Y, Sassa, Y, Hashizume, H, Sekiguchi, A, Fukushima, A, Kawashima, R (2010) Regional gray matter volume of dopaminergic system associate with creativity: evidence from voxel-based morphometry. Neuroimage 51(2), 578585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thakral, PP, Madore, KP, Kalinowski, SE, Schacter, DL (2020) Modulation of hippocampal brain networks produces changes in episodic simulation and divergent thinking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(23), 1272912740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tian, F, Chen, Q, Zhu, W, Wang, Y, Yang, W, Zhu, X, Tian, X, Zhang, Q, Cao, G, Qiu, J (2018) The association between visual creativity and cortical thickness in healthy adults. Neuroscience Letters 683, 104110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tu, P-C, Kuan, Y-H, Li, C-T, Su, T-P (2017) Structural correlates of creative thinking in patients with bipolar disorder and healthy controls-a voxel-based morphometry study. Journal of Affective Disorders 215, 218224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Eijk, L, Zhu, D, Couvy-Duchesne, B, Strike, LT, Lee, AJ, Hansell, NK, Thompson, PM, de Zubicaray, GI, McMahon, KL, Wright, MJ, Zietsch, BP (2021) Are sex differences in human brain structure associated with sex differences in behavior? Psychological Science 32(8), 11831197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woo, Y, Kang, W, Kang, Y, Kim, A, Han, K-M, Tae, W-S, Ham, B-J (2021) Cortical thickness and surface area abnormalities in bipolar I and II disorders. Psychiatry Investigation 18(9), 850863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, X, Yang, W, Tong, D, Sun, J, Chen, Q, Wei, D, Zhang, Q, Zhang, M, Qiu, J (2015) A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on divergent thinking using activation likelihood estimation. Human Brain Mapping 36(7), 27032718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yalin, N, Saricicek, A, Hidiroglu, C, Zugman, A, Direk, N, Ada, E, Cavusoglu, B, Er, Aşe, Isik, G, Ceylan, D, Tunca, Z, Kempton, MJ, Ozerdem, A (2019) Cortical thickness and surface area as an endophenotype in bipolar disorder type I patients and their first-degree relatives. NeuroImage: Clinical 22, 101695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, RC, Biggs, JT, Ziegler, VE, Meyer, DA (1978) A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. British Journal of Psychiatry 133(5), 429435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, F, Zhang, Q and Qiu, J (2013) Relating inter-individual differences in verbal creative thinking to cerebral structures: an optimal voxel-based morphometry study. PLoS One 8(11), e79272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. The demographic data and behavioural performance of participants in this study

Figure 1

Table 2. The cortical structures showing significant correlations between performance of divergent thinking and cortical thickness or surface areas in patients with bipolar disorder and controls

Figure 2

Figure 1. Cortical thickness correlates of divergent thinking measured by Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults (ATTA) in patients with bipolar disorder and healthy controls. In patients with bipolar disorder, total ATTA score was negatively correlated with cortical thickness in the right middle frontal gyrus, right occipital, and left precuneus. In contrast, total ATTA scores and cortical thickness were not significantly correlated among the controls. BD = bipolar disorder; A = anterior; P = posterior.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Cortical surface area correlates of divergent thinking in patients with bipolar disorder and healthy controls. In patients with bipolar disorder, total Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults (ATTA) score was positively correlated with surface area of right superior frontal gyrus. In contrast, total ATTA scores and surface area were not significantly correlated among the controls.

Supplementary material: File

Tu et al. supplementary material

Tu et al. supplementary material
Download Tu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 363.8 KB