Child health professionals are keen to understand the
origins of antisocial behaviour. Ben Lahey and
colleagues, in this issue's Annotation, remind us of the
evidence that it may reflect individual propensities to be
impulsive, to have high activity levels with greater than
average physical strength, coupled with low intelligence
and a sense of daring. Youths with an earlier age of onset,
before adolescence, are more likely than those with later
onset to meet criteria for ADHD, but whether ADHD as
such predisposes boys to engage in antisocial acts is
unclear. Oppositional Defiant Disorder may be the more
relevant influence. They discuss the role of “intelligence”
in protecting against the development of antisocial
behaviour, in particular the importance of reasonably
good verbal abilities. Interestingly, Lahey et al. take the
view that we are not yet in a position to be sure whether
specific cognitive deficits are important predisposing
factors for antisocial behaviour. They suggest that a more
parsimonious way of looking at cognitive influences is to
consider the global trait of intelligence without being
more specific until better evidence emerges. For clinicians
who wish to identify children who may be at high risk of
antisocial behaviour, it is also important to think about
parenting variables that may predispose to its development.
These include the use of harsh discipline, lack of
parental supervision, and antisocial parental attitudes.
Finally, they note there is increasing interest in the
influence of gender on the development of antisocial
behaviour. This article is concerned exclusively with
boys, and there is so far no truly convincing explanation
for the remarkable differences in prevalence of such
behaviour between the sexes. Girls appear to be easier to
socialise, and boys have poorer communication skills in
the preschool period. This aspect of sexual dimorphism is
worthy of further investigation, perhaps from the perspective
of gender differences in social cognitive development.
Helen Rushforth offers a Practitioner Review whose
purpose is to offer guidance to practitioners who are
responsible for communicating with hospitalised children.
She presents not only a literature review, which is
derived from the theories pertaining to children's conceptualisation
of health and illness, but her paper also
gives guidance to practitioners on how to communicate
effectively with children of different ages, and in different
clinical situations. The paper focuses on a range of
contemporary issues including pre-procedural preparation,
children's health promotion, and the need to
convey health promotion messages to young children.
She discusses the competence of children to give consent
for surgery, and the criteria by which their competence to
gain contraceptive advice without parental consent may
be judged.