No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Turo Hiltunen and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Corpus pragmatic studies on the history of medical discourse (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 330). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2022. Pp. vii + 322. ISBN 9789027211101.
Review products
Turo Hiltunen and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Corpus pragmatic studies on the history of medical discourse (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 330). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2022. Pp. vii + 322. ISBN 9789027211101.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 May 2023
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco. 2015. The functions of seem and parecer in early medical writing. Discourse Studies 17(2), 121–40.Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco. Forthcoming. Stance matrices and interpersonal meaning in nineteenth-century women's instructive writing in English. Language Value 22(1).Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Álvarez-Gil, Francisco J.. 2021. Evaluative that-structures in the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. In Moskowich, Isabel, Lareo, Inés & Camiña, Gonzalo (eds.), ‘All families and genera’: Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts, 228–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Mele-Marrero, Margarita. 2014. Stancetaking in seventeenth-century prefaces on obstetrics. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Sánchez, Ángeles. 2016. ‘If they have not the french’: Translation choices in The Happy Deliverie of Women (1612). The Translator 22(1), 40–58.Google Scholar
Banks, David. 2008. The development of scientific writing, linguistic features and historical context. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Banks, David. 2017. The birth of the academic article: Le Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions, 1665–1700. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of written and spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randi. 2015. Introduction. In Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randi (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics, 1–8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrió Pastor, María Luisa. 2020. Conocer la lengua a través de los corpus: La herramienta METOOL, retos para el análisis de los marcadores discursivos. Pragmalingüística 28, 255–74.Google Scholar
Charles, Maggie. 2006. The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics 27(3), 492–518.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2009. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship of two different categories. Functions of Language 16, 44–62.Google Scholar
Green, Monica. 2005. Flowers, poisons and men: Menstruation in medieval Western Europe. In Shail, Andrew & Howie, Gillian (eds.), Menstruation: A cultural history, 51–64. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2000. Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In Hunston, Susan & Thompson, Geoff (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 176–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Su, Hang. 2017. Patterns, constructions, and local grammar: A case study of ‘evaluation’. Applied Linguistics 40(4), 567–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Jiang, Feng (Kevin). 2018. ‘We believe that …’: Changes in an academic stance marker. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38(2), 139–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Tse, Polly. 2005a. Evaluative that constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language 12(1), 39–63.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Tse, Polly. 2005b. Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 24(2), 123–39.Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. 2009. Historical corpus pragmatics: Focus on speech acts and texts. In Jucker, Andreas H., Schreier, Daniel & Hundt, Marianne (eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse, 11–36. Amsterdam: Brill.Google Scholar
Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Shen, Yuan Kui, Aiden, Aviva Presser, Veres, Adrian, Gray, Matthew K., Pickett, Joseph P., Hoiberg, Dale, Clancy, Dan, Norvig, Peter, Orwant, Jon, Pinker, Stephen, Nowak, Martin A. & Aiden, Erez Lieberman. 2011. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014), 176–82.Google Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel, Lareo, Inés & Camiña, Gonzalo (eds.). 2021. ‘All families and genera’: Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1986. Fictional worlds. In Coulthard, Malcolm (ed.), Talking about text: Studies presented to David Brazil on his retirement, 43–60. Birmingham: English Language Research.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2011. Medical case reports and scientific thought-styles. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 17, 75–98.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Jucker, Andreas H. & Tuominen, Jukka. 2014. Diachronic corpus pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar