Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:43:09.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Submit content

Help address this Question with your content Submit Content

One Health most often has people as the primary beneficiary. How must One Health policies and practice change to make animal, plant and ecosystem health a primary focus that is influenced by human and environmental factors?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2022

Craig Stephen*
Affiliation:
McEachran Institute, Nanoose Bay, BC, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Craig Stephen, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The bulk of One Heath’s investment and research focuses on how animal or environmental threats impact human health or well-being. One Health has been less attentive to how human and environmental dimensions interact to impact animal health or on the environmental implications of health management at the human-animal interface. There has also been comparatively little investigation on how to create One Health programmes that promote reciprocal care that is neither human first, nor animal first nor environment first, but rather concurrently protects the health of all three. With this question, we invite authors to explore if or how current policies, practices and perspectives have shaped the primacy of human health as a benefactor of One Health and examine what changes need to be made, if any, to broaden the application of One Health approaches and perspectives. We encourage the use of implementation science methods and strategies to develop evidence-based policies and practice and to promote their regular use by researchers, practitioners and policymakers.

Type
Question
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Context

The bulk of One Heath’s investment and research focuses on how animal or environmental threats impact human health or well-being. One Health has been less attentive to how human and environmental dimensions interact to impact animal health or on the environmental implications of health management at the human-animal interface. There has also been comparatively little investigation on how to create One Health programmes that promote reciprocal care that is neither human first, nor animal first nor environment first, but rather concurrently protects the health of all three. With this question, we invite authors to explore if or how current policies, practices and perspectives have shaped the primacy of human health as a benefactor of One Health and examine what changes need to be made, if any, to broaden the application of One Health approaches and perspectives. We encourage the use of implementation science methods and strategies to develop evidence-based policies and practice and to promote their regular use by researchers, practitioners and policymakers.

How to contribute to this Question

If you believe you can contribute to answering this Question with your research outputs, find out how to submit in the Instructions for authors (https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/research-directions-one-health/information/author-instructions). This journal publishes Results, Analyses, Impact papers and additional content such as preprints and “grey literature.” Questions will be closed when the editors agree that enough has been published to answer the Question so before submitting, check if this is still an active Question. If it is closed, another relevant Question may be currently open, so do review all the open Questions in your field. For any further queries, check the information pages (https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/research-directions-one-health/information/about-this-journal) or contact this email ().

Competing interests

The author(s) declare none.