Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:34:54.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenges on the effect of cell phone radiation on mammalian embryos and fetuses: a review of the literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2021

Maryam Mahaldashtian Open the ORCID record for Maryam Mahaldashtian [Opens in a new window] ,
Mohammad Ali Khalili Open the ORCID record for Mohammad Ali Khalili [Opens in a new window] ,
Fatemeh Anbari ,
Mohammad Seify  and
Manuel Belli
Maryam Mahaldashtian
Affiliation:
Department of Reproductive Biology, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Mohammad Ali Khalili*
Affiliation:
Department of Reproductive Biology, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Fatemeh Anbari
Affiliation:
Department of Reproductive Biology, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Mohammad Seify
Affiliation:
Department of Reproductive Biology, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Manuel Belli
Affiliation:
Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Mohammad Ali Khalili. Department of Reproductive Biology, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Cell phones operate with a wide range of frequency bands and emit radiofrequency-electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR). Concern on the possible health hazards of RF-EMR has been growing in many countries because these RF-EMR pulses may be absorbed into the body cells, directly affecting them. There are some in vitro and in vivo animal studies related to the consequences of RF-EMR exposure from cell phones on embryo development and offspring. In addition, some studies have revealed that RF-EMR from cellular phone may lead to decrease in the rates of fertilization and embryo development, as well as the risk of the developmental anomalies, other studies have reported that it does not interfere with in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection success rates, or the chromosomal aberration rate. Of course, it is unethical to study the effect of waves generated from cell phones on the forming human embryos. Conversely, other mammals have many similarities to humans in terms of anatomy, physiology and genetics. Therefore, in this review we focused on the existing literature evaluating the potential effects of RF-EMR on mammalian embryonic and fetal development.

Keywords

Cell phoneEmbryo developmentFetusMammalRadiofrequency-electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR)
Type
Review Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 176 - 182
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdel-Rassoul, G, El-Fateh, OA, Salem, MA, Michael, A, Farahat, F, El-Batanouny, M and Salem, E (2007). Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations. Neurotoxicology 28, 434–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A, Aponte-Mellado, A, Premkumar, BJ, Shaman, A and Gupta, S (2012). The effects of oxidative stress on female reproduction: A review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 10, 49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alchalabi, ASH, Aklilu, E, Aziz, AR, Malek, F, Ronald, SH and Khan, MA (2016). Different periods of intrauterine exposure to electromagnetic field: Influence on female rats’ fertility, prenatal and postnatal development. Asian Pac J Reprod 5, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altun, G, Deniz, ÖG, Yurt, KK, Davis, D and Kaplan, S (2018). Effects of mobile phone exposure on metabolomics in the male and female reproductive systems. Environ Res 167, 700–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayşe, IG, Zafer, A, Sule, O, Işil, IT and Kalkan, T (2010). Differentiation of K562 cells under ELF-EMF applied at different time courses. Electromagn Biol Med 29, 122–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Azimipour, F, Zavareh, S and Lashkarbolouki, T (2020). The effect of radiation emitted by cell phone on the gelatinolytic activity of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 of mouse pre-antral follicles during in vitro culture. Cell J 22, 1–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Bahreyni Toossi, MH, Sadeghnia, HR, Mohammad Mahdizadeh Feyzabadi, M, Hosseini, M, Hedayati, M, Mosallanejad, R, Beheshti, F and Alizadeh Rahvar, Z (2018). Exposure to mobile phone (900–1800 MHz) during pregnancy: Tissue oxidative stress after childbirth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 31, 1298–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batellier, F, Couty, I, Picard, D and Brillard, JP (2008). Effects of exposing chicken eggs to a cell phone in ‘call’ position over the entire incubation period. Theriogenology 69, 737–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedir, R, Tumkaya, L, Şehitoğlu İ Kalkan, Y, Yilmaz, A and Şahin, OZ (2015). The effect of exposure of rats during prenatal period to radiation spreading from mobile phones on renal development. Ren Fail 37, 305–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beraldi, R, Sciamanna, I, Mangiacasale, R, Lorenzini, R and Spadafora, C (2003). Mouse early embryos obtained by natural breeding or in vitro fertilization display a differential sensitivity to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. Mutat Res 538, 163–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Calcabrini, C, Mancini, U, De Bellis, R, Diaz, AR, Martinelli, M, Cucchiarini, L, Sestili, P, Stocchi, V and Potenza, L (2017). Effect of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on antioxidant activity in the human keratinocyte cell line NCTC 2544. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 64, 415–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Celikozlu, SD, Ozyurt, MS, Cimbiz, A, Yardimoglu, MY, Cayci, MK and Ozay, Y (2012). The effects of long-term exposure of magnetic field via 900-MHz GSM radiation on some biochemical parameters and brain histology in rats. Electromagn Biol Med 31, 344–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, H, Qu, Z and Liu, W (2017). Effects of simulated mobile phone electromagnetic radiation on fertilization and embryo development. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 36, 123–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Çiğ, B and Nazıroğlu, M (2015). Investigation of the effects of distance from sources on apoptosis, oxidative stress and cytosolic calcium accumulation via TRPV1 channels induced by mobile phones and Wi-Fi in breast cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1848, 2756–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Cousin, ME and Siegrist, M (2010). Risk perception of mobile communication: A mental models approach. J Risk Res 13, 599–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diem, E, Schwarz, C, Adlkofer, F, Jahn, O and Rüdiger, H (2005). Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro . Mutat Res 583, 178–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Sayed, A, Badr, HS, Yahia, R, Salem, SM and Kandil, AM (2011). Effects of thirty minute mobile phone irradiation on morphological and physiological parameters and gene expression in pregnant rats and their fetuses. Afr J Biotechnol 10, 19670–80.Google Scholar
Fatehi, D, Anjomshoa, M, Mohammadi, M, Seify, M and Rostamzadeh, A (2018). Biological effects of cell-phone radiofrequency waves exposure on fertilization in mice; an in vivo and in vitro study. Middle East Fertil Soc J 23, 148–53.Google Scholar
Fragopoulou, AF, Koussoulakos, SL and Margaritis, LH (2010). Cranial and postcranial skeletal variations induced in mouse embryos by mobile phone radiation. Pathophysiology 17, 169–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gautam, R, Singh, KV, Nirala, J, Murmu, NN, Meena, R and Rajamani, P (2019). Oxidative stress-mediated alterations on sperm parameters in male Wistar rats exposed to 3G mobile phone radiation. Andrologia 51, e13201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gul, A, Celebi, H and Uğraş, S (2009). The effects of microwave emitted by cellular phones on ovarian follicles in rats. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280, 729–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutschi, T, Mohamad Al-Ali, B, Shamloul, R, Pummer, K and Trummer, H (2011). Impact of cell phone use on men’s semen parameters. Andrologia 43, 312–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haghani, M, Shabani, M and Moazzami, K (2013). Maternal mobile phone exposure adversely affects the electrophysiological properties of Purkinje neurons in rat offspring. Neuroscience 250, 588–98.Google ScholarPubMed
Haghani, M, Pouladvand, V, Mortazavi, SMJ, Razavinasab, M, Bayat, M and Shabani, M (2020). Exposure to electromagnetic field during gestation adversely affects the electrophysiological properties of purkinje cells in rat offspring. J Biomed Phys Eng 10, 433–40.Google Scholar
Hossain, MI, Faruque, MR and Islam, MT (2015). Analysis on the effect of the distances and inclination angles between human head and mobile phone on SAR. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 119, 103–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Jing, J, Yuhua, Z, Xiao-qian, Y, Rongping, J, Dong-mei, G and Xi, C (2012). The influence of microwave radiation from cellular phone on fetal rat brain. Electromagn Biol Med 31, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klug, S, Hetscher, M, Giles, S, Kohlsmann, S and Kramer, K (1997). The lack of effects of nonthermal RF electromagnetic fields on the development of rat embryos grown in culture. Life Sci 61, 1789–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koohestani, NV, Zavareh, S, Lashkarbolouki, T and Azimipour, F (2019). Exposure to cell phone induce oxidative stress in mice preantral follicles during in vitro cultivation: An experimental study. Int J Reprod Biomed 17, 637–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Lampiao, F (2012). Free radicals generation in an in vitro fertilization setting and how to minimize them. World J Obstet Gynecol 1, 29–34.Google Scholar
Mannerling, AC, Simkó, M, Mild, KH and Mattsson, MO (2010). Effects of 50-Hz magnetic field exposure on superoxide radical anion formation and HSP70 induction in human K562 cells. Radiat Environ Biophys 49, 731–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogawa, K, Nabae, K, Wang, J, Wake, K, Watanabe, S, Kawabe, M, Fujiwara, O, Takahashi, S, Ichihara, T, Tamano, S and Shirai, T (2009). Effects of gestational exposure to 1.95-GHz W-CDMA signals for IMT-2000 cellular phones: Lack of embryotoxicity and teratogenicity in rats. Bioelectromagnetics 30, 205–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Okechukwu, CE (2018). Effects of mobile phone radiation and exercise on testicular function in male Wistar rats. Niger J Exp Clin Biosci 6, 51–8.Google Scholar
Okechukwu, CE (2020). Does the use of mobile phone affect male fertility? A mini-review. J Hum Reprod Sci 13, 174–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Özorak, A, Nazıroğlu, M, Çelik, Ö Yüksel, M, Özçelik, D, Özkaya, MO, Çetin, H, Kahya, MC and Kose, SA (2013). Wi-Fi (2.45 GHz)- and mobile phone (900 and 1800 MHz)-induced risks on oxidative stress and elements in kidney and testis of rats during pregnancy and the development of offspring. Biol Trace Elem Res, 156, 221–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patruno, A, Tabrez, S, Pesce, M, Shakil, S, Kamal, MA and Reale, M (2015). Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) on catalase, cytochrome P450 and nitric oxide synthase in erythro-leukemic cells. Life Sci 121, 117–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Safari, S, Mortazavi, SMJ, Aghazade, N and Mousavi, Y (2020). The effects of distance and duration of exposure to electromagnetic radiation of hair dryer on rat sperm parameters. J Biosci Med 8, 17–27.Google Scholar
Safian, F, Khalili, MA, Khoradmehr, A, Anbari, F, Soltani, S and Halvaei, I (2016). Survival assessment of mouse preimplantation embryos after exposure to cell phone radiation. J Reprod Infertil 17, 138–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Sakurai, T, Satake, A, Sumi, S, Inoue, K and Miyakoshi, J (2004). An extremely low frequency magnetic field attenuates insulin secretion from the insulinoma cell line, RIN-m. Bioelectromagnetics 25, 160–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santini, SJ, Cordone, V, Falone, S, Mijit, M, Tatone, C, Amicarelli, F and Di Emidio, G (2018). Role of mitochondria in the oxidative stress induced by electromagnetic fields: Focus on reproductive systems. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2018, 5076271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, Y, Akiba, S, Kubo, O and Yamaguchi, N (2011). A case-case study of mobile phone use and acoustic neuroma risk in Japan. Bioelectromagnetics 32, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafiei, G, Almasi, M, Nikzad, H, Miyan, J, Mahabadi, JA and Moshkdanian, G (2020). l-Carnitine reduces the adverse effects of ROS and up-regulates the expression of implantation related genes in in vitro developed mouse embryos. Theriogenology 145, 59–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Staebler, P (2017). Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields: From Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) to Radiofrequency. Wiley, 424 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, S, Okutsu, M, Suganuma, R, Komiya, H, Nakatani-Enomoto, S, Kobayashi, S, Ugawa, Y, Tateno, H and Fujimori, K (2017). Influence of radiofrequency-electromagnetic waves from 3rd-generation cellular phones on fertilization and embryo development in mice. Bioelectromagnetics 38, 466–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swerdlow, AJ, Feychting, M, Green, AC, Leeka Kheifets, LK, Savitz, DA and International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Standing Committee on Epidemiology (2011). Mobile phones, brain tumors, and the interphone study: Where are we now? Environ Health Perspect 119, 1534–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Türedi, S, Hancı, H, Çolakoğlu, S, Kaya, H and Odacı, E (2016). Disruption of the ovarian follicle reservoir of prepubertal rats following prenatal exposure to a continuous 900-MHz electromagnetic field. Int J Radiat Biol 92, 329–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Weisbrot, D, Lin, H, Ye, L, Blank, M and Goodman, R (2003). Effects of mobile phone radiation on reproduction and development in Drosophila melanogaster . J Cell Biochem 89, 48–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ye, W, Wang, F, Zhang, W, Fang, N, Zhao, W and Wang, J (2016). Effect of mobile phone radiation on cardiovascular development of chick embryo. Anat Histol Embryol 45, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yüksel, M, Nazıroğlu, M and Özkaya, MO (2016). Long-term exposure to electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones and Wi-Fi devices decreases plasma prolactin, progesterone, and estrogen levels but increases uterine oxidative stress in pregnant rats and their offspring. Endocrine 52, 352–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed