No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 June 2014
1 Chapter 4, Drusilla K. Brown, Alan V. Deardorff, and Robert M. Stern, ‘Labor Standards and Human Rights: Implications for International Trade and Investment’.
2 Chapter 4, p. 183.
3 Chapter 5, p. 198.
4 Chapter 5, Tomer Broude, ‘Interactions Between Subsidies Regulation and Foreign Investment, and the Primacy of the International Trade Regime’.
5 Chapter 5, p. 225.
6 Chapter 5, p. 207.
7 Article III:8(b) of the GATT 1994 expressly permits governments to discriminate by making subsidies available solely to domestic producers.
8 Chapter 6, Daniel M. Firger and Michael B. Gerrard, ‘Environmental Protection’.
9 Chapter 6, p. 256.
10 Chapter 7, Keith E. Maskus, ‘Technology Transfer: Regulatory Issues and International Investment Agreements’.
11 Chapter 7, pp. 300–301.
12 Chapter 8, Victoria Barbary and Bernardo Bortolotti, ‘Sovereign Wealth Funds and Political Risk: New Challenges in the Regulation of Foreign Investment’.
13 Chapter 8, pp. 337–338.
14 Chapter 10, Theodore H. Moran, ‘Foreign Acquisitions and National Security: What Are Genuine Threats? What are Implausible Worries?’.
15 Chapter 10, pp. 382–385.
16 Chapter 10, pp. 385–388.
17 Chapter 11, Federico Ortino, ‘Public Services, Investment Liberalization and Protection’.
18 Chapter 1, Petros C. Mavroidis, ‘Regulation of Investment in the Trade Régime: From ITO to WTO’.
19 Chapter 2, Jorge A. Huerta Goldman, ‘Domestic, Regional and Multilateral Investment Liberalization’.
20 Chapter 3, Bart De Meester and Dominic Coppens, ‘Mode 3 of the GATS: A Model for Disciplining Measures Affecting Investment Flows?’.
21 Chapter 9, Moshe Hirsch, ‘International Tribunals as Agents of Harmonization’.
22 Chapter 12, Americo Beviglia Zampetti and Colin Brown, ‘The EU Approach to Investment’.
23 Chapter 12, p. 428.
24 Chapter 12, p. 428.
25 Chapter 13, Zdenek Drabek, ‘Harmonization of Rules on Foreign Investment’.
26 Chapter 13, p. 480.
27 Chapter 13, p. 481.
28 Messrs. Friedbacher and Roney are partners in the Geneva office of Sidley Austin LLP. The views expressed in this review are those of the authors alone, and do not represent the views of Sidley Austin LLP or any of its clients.