Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T19:17:01.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

China – Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Measures on Broiler Products from the United States (Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by the United States) (China–Broiler Products (Article 21.5 – United States)), DS427

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2018

Kholofelo Kugler
Kholofelo Kugler*
Affiliation:
Works at the Advisory Centre on WTO Law (ACWL), but writes in personal capacity
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This dispute concerns the challenge by the United States to measures taken by China to comply with the rulings and recommendations of the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) in the original proceeding China–Broiler Products. Based on a redetermination issued by the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), China continued to impose anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of broiler products from US producers (Keystone, Tyson, and Pilgrim's Pride). Overall, the compliance panel concluded that China failed to bring its measures into conformity with the Anti-Dumping Agreement (AD Agreement) and the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM Agreement).

Type
Case Summaries
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , July 2018 , pp. 541 - 545
Copyright
Copyright © Kholofelo Kugler 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Case Summaries: WTO Disputes

The following summaries provide a brief factual background and describe the key findings of recent WTO panel and Appellate Body reports.

References

1 Panel Report, China–Broiler Products (Article 21.5 – United States), para. 7.60.

2 Ibid., para. 7.75.

3 Ibid., para. 7.76.

4 Ibid., para. 7.107 (original underlining).

5 Ibid., para. 7.113.

6 Ibid., para. 7.116.

7 Ibid., para. 7.118.

8 Ibid., para. 7.163.

9 Ibid., para. 7.201.

10 Ibid., para. 7.203.

11 Ibid., para. 7.237.

12 Ibid., paras. 7.258–260.

13 Ibid., paras. 7.262 and 7.263.

14 Ibid., paras. 7.235 and 7.236.

15 Ibid., para. 7.310.

16 Ibid., para. 7.315.

17 Ibid., para. 7.325 (original underlining).

18 Ibid., paras. 7.304, 7.307, 7.319, and 7.322.

19 Ibid., para. 7.348 (original underlining).

20 Ibid., para. 7.357 (original underlining).

21 Ibid., para. 7.359.

22 Ibid., para. 7.376.

23 Ibid., para. 7.378.

24 Ibid., para. 7.395.

25 Ibid., para. 7.416.

26 Ibid., para. 7.437.

27 Ibid., para. 7.438.