Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:03:31.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Emergence, Survival, and Fecundity in No-Till Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Vince M. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1155
William G. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1155
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Horseweed has generally been considered a winter annual weed species, but efforts to control horseweed as a winter annual weed in no-till soybean production with glyphosate have routinely failed in southeast Indiana. The objective of this study was to determine emergence timing, plant survival, and fecundity of a glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed biotype in the presence or absence of other winter annual weeds or soybean. A field study was conducted from October 2003 to October 2004 and repeated from October 2004 to October 2005 in fields following no-till soybean production. Horseweed emergence was not observed in the fall of 2003. Winter survival of plants that emerged in the fall of 2004 was 20% by late April 2005 and was inversely related to fall rosette size. Horseweed population densities were the highest in mid-May of both years, and over 90% of the plants observed at this time emerged in the spring. Plant survival from mid-May to mid-October was 3% and 21% in 2004 and 2005, respectively. Horseweed with flower heads above the soybean canopy by early August had greater late-season survival and produced more seed than plants growing below the canopy. Horseweed with flower heads above the soybean canopy produced an average of 27,200 and 58,320 seeds plant−1 in 2004 and 2005, respectively. Our research indicates that this southeast Indiana horseweed biotype behaves primarily as a summer annual weed and produces significant amounts of seed when uncontrolled in no-till soybean production.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barnes, J., Johnson, B., Gibson, K., and Weller, S. 2004. Crop rotation and tillage system influence late-season incidence of giant ragweed and horseweed in Indiana soybean. Crop Manag. http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org. Accessed: January 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. and Bekech, M. M. 1993. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed production, emergence and distribution in no-tillage and conventional-tillage corn (Zea mays). Agron. Trends Agric. Sci. 1:6771.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., and Hunter, J. S. 1978. Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. New York J. Wiley. 10158–0180.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, L. D., Pagette, S. R., Kimball, S. L., and Wells, B. H. 1997. Perspectives on glyphosate resistance. Weed Technol. 11:189198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J. A. and Kells, J. J. 1990. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soybean (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:642–547.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Owen, M. D. K. 1997. Emergence and survival of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci. 45:98101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, V. M., Johnson, W. G., and Gibson, K. D. 2005. An update on the distribution of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in Indiana. Proc. North. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:198.Google Scholar
Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany, 8th ed. New York American Book. 1447. p.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Johnson, W. G., and Hillger, D. E. 2005. Farmer perceptions of problematic corn and soybean weeds in Indiana. Weed Technol. 19:10651070.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. and Croquist, A. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. Bronx, NY New York Botanical Garden. 592. p.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 2007. International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed: May 2007.Google Scholar
Johnson, B., Barnes, J., Gibson, K., and Weller, S. 2004. Late-season weed escapes in Indiana soybean fields. Crop Manag. http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org. Accessed: January 2006.Google Scholar
Moseley, C. M. and Hagood, E. S. Jr. 1990. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in full-season no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 4:814818.Google Scholar
Regehr, D. L. and Bazzaz, F. A. 1979. The population dynamics of Erigeron canadensis, a successional winter annual. J. Ecol. 67:923933.Google Scholar
Smisek, A. 1995. Resistance to Paraquat in Erigeron canadensis L. . London, Canada University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
Thébaud, C. and Abbott, R. J. 1995. Characterization of invasive Conyza species (Asteraceae) in Europe: quantitative trait and isozyme analysis. Am. J. Bot. 82:360368.Google Scholar
Trainer, G. D., Loux, M. M., Harrison, S. K., and Regnier, E. 2005. Response of horseweed biotypes to foliar applications of cloransulam-methyl and glyphosate. Weed Technol. 19:568577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, M. J. 2001. Glyphosate-Resistant horseweed in Delaware. Weed Sci. 49:703705.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J., Ayeni, A. O., and Majek, B. A. 2001. Glyphosate in full season no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean: role of preplant applications and residual herbicides. Weed Technol. 15:714724.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E. 2001. The biology of Canadian weeds, 115: Conyza canadensis . Can. J. Plant Sci. 81:867875.Google Scholar
Zelaya, I. A., Owen, M. D. K., and VanGessel, M. J. 2004. Inheritance of evolved glyphosate resistance in Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110:5870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed