Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:24:39.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Executive functions are impaired in adolescents engaging in non-suicidal self-injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2010

L. T. Fikke*
Affiliation:
The Cognitive Developmental Research Unit (EKUP), Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway
A. Melinder
Affiliation:
The Cognitive Developmental Research Unit (EKUP), Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway
N. I. Landrø
Affiliation:
The Cognitive Developmental Research Unit (EKUP), Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway Center for the Study of Human Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway
*
*Address for correspondence: L. T. Fikke, Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo, 0317 Blindern, Oslo, Norway. (Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate three main aspects of executive functions (EFs), i.e. shifting, updating and inhibition, in adolescents engaging in non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) as compared with healthy controls.

Method

EFs were assessed using the Intra/Extradimensional Set Shift, the Spatial Working Memory (SWM) Test and the Stop Signal Test (SST) from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB), in a high-severity NSSI group (n=33), a low-severity NSSI group (n=29) and a healthy control group (n=35). Diagnostic characteristics were examined using the Kiddie-Sads-Present and Lifetime Version.

Results

There were group differences on the SWM Test. A trend towards an interaction effect of sex revealed that males in the high-severity NSSI group made significantly more errors than males and females in the control group. Both males and females in the high-severity NSSI group made poor use of an efficient strategy in completing the test. The low-severity NSSI group performed poorly on the SST, making more errors than the control group and showing an impaired ability to inhibit initiated responses, as compared with the high-severity NSSI group. There were group differences in frequencies of current and previous major depressive disorder. However, no effects of these diagnoses were found on any of the EF tests.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that NSSI subgroups have distinct deficits in EFs. The high-severity NSSI group has working memory deficits, while the low-severity NSSI group has impaired inhibitory control. This supports the emotion regulation hypothesis.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrosini, PJ, Metz, C, Bianchi, MD, Rabinovich, H, Undie, A (1991). Concurrent validity and psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory in outpatient adolescents. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 30, 5157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, V (1998). Assessing executive functions in children: biological, psychological, and developmental considerations. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 8, 319349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, VA, Anderson, P, Northam, E, Jacobs, R, Catroppa, C (2001). Development of executive functions through late childhood and adolescence in an Australian sample. Developmental Neuropsychology 20, 385406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
APA (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Beck, AT, Epstein, N, Brown, G, Steer, RA (1988 a). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56, 893897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, AT, Steer, RA, Garbin, MG (1988 b). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review 8, 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambridge Cognition (2006). CANTABeclipse Version 3. Test Administration Guide. Cambridge Cognition Ltd: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cyders, MA, Smith, GT (2008). Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: positive and negative urgency. Psychological Bulletin 134, 807828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagle, DM, Baunez, C, Hutcheson, DM, Lehmann, O, Shah, AP, Robbins, TW (2007). Stop-signal reaction-time task performance: role of prefrontal cortex and subthalamic nucleus. Cerebral Cortex 18, 178188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagerlund, B, Pagsberg, AK, Hemmingsen, RP (2006). Cognitive deficits and levels of IQ in adolescent onset schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Schizophrenia Research 85, 3039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Favazza, AR (1998). The coming of age of self-mutilation. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 186, 259268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fields, S, Collins, C, Leraas, K, Reynolds, B (2009). Dimensions of impulsive behavior in adolescent smokers and nonsmokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 17, 302311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, JJ, Levenson, RW (1997). Hiding feelings: the acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 106, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guertin, T, Lloyd-Richardson, E, Spirito, A, Donaldson, D, Boergers, J (2001). Self-mutilative behaviour in adolescents who attempt suicide by overdose. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 40, 10621069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herba, CM, Tranah, T, Rubia, K, Yule, W (2006). Conduct problems in adolescence: three domains of inhibition and effect of gender. Developmental Neuropsychology 30, 659695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, CM, Gould, M (2007). The epidemiology and phenomenology of non-suicidal self-injurious behavior among adolescents: a critical review of the literature. Archives of Suicide Research 11, 129147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janis, IB, Nock, MK (2009). Are self-injurers impulsive?: Results from two behavioral laboratory studies. Psychiatry Research 169, 261267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jolly, JB, Aruffo, JF, Wherry, JN, Livingston, R (1993). The utility of the Beck Anxiety Inventory with inpatient adolescents. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 7, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J, Birmaher, B, Brent, D, Rao, U, Flynn, C, Moreci, P, Williamson, D, Ryan, N (1997). Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children – present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 36, 980988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyte, ZA, Goodyer, IM, Sahakian, BJ (2005). Selected executive skills in adolescents with recent first episode major depression. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 46, 995–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsson, B, Melin, L (1990). Depressive symptoms in Swedish adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 18, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laye-Gindhu, A, Schonert-Reichl, K (2005). Nonsuicidal self-harm among community adolescents: understanding the “whats” and “whys” of self-harm. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 34, 447457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd-Richardson, EE, Perrine, N, Dierker, L, Kelley, ML (2007). Characteristics and functions on non-suicidal self-injury in a community sample of adolescents. Psychological Medicine 37, 11831192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, GD, Cowan, WB, Davis, KA (1984). On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10, 276291.Google Scholar
Matthews, K, Coghill, D, Rhodes, S (2008). Neuropsychological functioning in depressed adolescent girls. Journal of Affective Disorders 111, 113118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, A, Friedman, NP, Emerson, MJ, Witzki, AH, Howerter, A, Wager, TD (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology 41, 49–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muehlenkamp, JJ, Gutierrez, PM (2004). An investigation of differences between self-injurious behavior and suicide attempts in a sample of adolescents. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 34, 1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muehlenkamp, JJ, Gutierrez, PM (2007). Risk for suicide attempts among adolescents who engage in non-suicidal self-injury. Archives of Suicide Research 11, 6982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, S, Henry, JD, McDonald, S, Martin, I, Brodaty, H, Peek-O'Leary, M-A (2007). Cognitive disinhibition and socioemotional functioning in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 13, 10601064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nock, MK, Prinstein, MJ (2005). Contextual features and behavioral functions of self-mutilation among adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 114, 140146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nock, MK, Wedig, MM, Holmberg, EB, Hooley, JM (2008). The emotion reactivity scale: development, evaluation, and relation to self-injurious thoughts and behaviors. Behavior Therapy 39, 107116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohmann, S, Schuch, B, Konig, M, Blaas, S, Fliri, C, Popow, C (2008). Self-injurious behavior in adolescent girls. Psychopathology 41, 226235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldershaw, A, Grima, E, Jollant, F, Richards, C, Simic, M, Taylor, L, Schmidt, U (2009). Decision making and problem solving in adolescents who deliberately self-harm. Psychological Medicine 39, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osman, A, Hoffman, J, Barrios, FX, Kopper, BA, Breitenstein, JL, Hahn, SK (2002). Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Beck Anxiety Inventory in adolescent psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology 58, 443456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, AM, Downes, JJ, Sahakian, BJ, Polkey, CE, Robbins, TW (1990). Planning and spatial working memory following frontal lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia 28, 10211034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, ML, Drevets, WC, Rauch, SL, Lane, R (2003). Neurobiology of emotion perception I: the neural basis of normal emotion perception. Biological Psychiatry 54, 504514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Psychological Corporation (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) Manual. Psychological Corporation: San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Robbins, TW, James, M, Owen, AM, Sahakian, BJ, Lawrence, AD, McInnes, L, Rabbitt, PMA (1998). A study of performance on tests from the CANTAB battery sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction in a large sample of normal volunteers: implications for theories of executive functioning and cognitive aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 4, 474490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S, Heath, N (2002). A study of the frequency of self-mutilation in a community sample of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 31, 6777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S, Heath, NL (2003). Two models of adolescent self-mutilation. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 33, 277287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skegg, K (2005). Self-harm. Lancet 366, 14711483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spielberger, CD (1988). State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL.Google Scholar
Van Dillen, LF, Koole, SL (2007). Clearing the mind: a working memory model of distraction from negative mood. Emotion 7, 715723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitlock, J, Muehlenkamp, J, Eckenrode, J (2008). Variation in nonsuicidal self-injury: identification and features of latent classes in a college population of emerging adults. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 37, 725735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoroglu, SS, Tuzun, U, Sar, V, Tutkun, H, Savas, HA, Ozturk, M, Alyanak, B, Kora, ME (2003). Suicide attempt and self-mutilation among Turkish high school students in relation with abuse, neglect and dissociation. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 57, 119126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed