We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Verification of Dual-Use Chemical Weapons under the CWC: The Case of Thiodiglycol - S. J. Lundin (ed.) New York: Oxford University Press, 1991, 150 pp. US$35.00 paper. ISBN 0-19-829156-6. Oxford University Press, 200 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10016, USA.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
17 May 2016
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Baruch, B. (1960). “Statement by the U.S. Representative to the U.N. Atomic Energy Commission.”Documents on Disarmament 1945-59.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State.Google Scholar
Goldblat, J. (1983). Arms Control Agreements.Stockholm: SIPRI.Google Scholar
CEFIC and CMA (1991). “CEFIC and CMA Positions on Chemical Weapons Convention Issues Affecting the Chemical Industry.”Joint statement of the European Council of Chemical Manufacturers Federations (CEFIC) and the Chemical Manufacturers Association (CMA).June. Photocopy.Google Scholar
Kriakopoulos, N. and Stock, T. (1992). “A Simple, Equitable, and Effective Chemical Weapons Convention.”Presented at the 19th Workshop of the Pugwash Study Group on Chemical and Biological Warfare.January 11-12. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar