Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T10:50:17.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transgenesis in Farm Animals: Ethical Implications for Public Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

T. B. Mepham
T. B. Mepham*
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

There is currently considerable investment in research aimed at producing transgenic farm animals with enhanced productive capacities. This article submits these prospective technologies to critical ethical evaluation. The analysis provided, focusing on issues relevant to public policy, suggests the need to introduce additional regulations governing the use of these technologies. Should their use be permitted in principle, specific legislation would seem to be required: (1) to protect the welfare of transgenic animals produced/kept in commercial enterprises; (2) to ensure the freedom of choice of purchasers of food and other products derived from transgenic animals by provision of adequate information on the source of the products; and (3) to provide a mechanism for limiting the use of transgenic technologies to those that are in the public interest.

Type
Animal Biotechnology
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , August 1994 , pp. 195 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs (1991). “Biotechnology and the American Agricultural Industry.” Journal of the American Medical Association 265:1429–36.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J.F. (1989). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, C.A.R. and Noble, D., eds. (1993). The Logic of Life: The Challenge of Integrative Physiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
British Medical Association (1992). Our Genetic Future: The Science and Ethics of Genetic Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
British Veterinary Association (1993). Evidence to the House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology: “Regulation of the UK Biotechnology Industry and Global Competitiveness.” HL Paper 80-II.Google Scholar
Broom, D.M. (1993). “Assessing the Welfare of Modified or Treated Animals.” Livestock Production Science 36:39–54.Google Scholar
Callahan, D. (1990). What Kind of Life: The Limits of Medical Progress. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Centre for Exploitation of Science and Technology (1993). Evidence to the House of Lords Committee on Science and Technology: “Regulation of the UK Biotechnology Industry and Global Competitiveness.” HL Paper 80-II.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Community (1993). Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering: What Europe Thinks about It in 1993. Eurobarometer 39.1. A report prepared by INRA (Europe), European Coordination Office (October).Google Scholar
Department of Health (1993). Evidence to the House of Lords Committee on Science and Technology: “Regulation of the UK Biotechnology Industry and Global Competitiveness.” HL Paper 80-I.Google Scholar
Donnelly, S. (1993). “The Ethical Challenges of Animal Biotechnology.” Livestock Production Science 36:91–98.Google Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council (1993). Evidence to the House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology: “Regulation of the UK Biotechnology Industry and Global Competitiveness.” HL Paper 80-I.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J. (1993). “Evolution of Organisms.” In Boyd, C.A.R. and Noble, D.(eds.), The Logic of Life: The Challenge of Integrative Physiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1990). “Embryos and Hedgehogs: On the Moral Status of the Embryo.” In Dyson, A. and Harris, J.(eds.), Experiments on Embryos. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heap, R.B. (1994). Personal communication. At conference on Genetic Modification of Foods, Campden Food and Drink Research Association, Chipping Campden, Glos, March 1.Google Scholar
Heap, R.B. and Moor, R.M. (1994). “Reproductive Technologies in Farm Animals.” In Mepham, T.B., Tucker, G.A., and Wiseman, J.(eds.), Issues in Agricultural Bioethics. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
House of Lords (1993). Select Committee on Science and Technology: “Regulation of the UK Biotechnology Industry and Global Competitiveness.” HL Paper 80.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (1993). Donated Ovarian Tissue in Embryo Research and Assisted Conception. London: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.Google Scholar
Kohn, M. (1994). “Stretched Genes” [interview with Dr. K. Ward].” The Observer: Life Supplement (March 6):4–6.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food (1993). Report of the Committee on the Ethics of Genetic Modification and Food Use. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Marlier, E. (1992). “Eurobarometer 35.1: Opinions of Europeans on Biotechnology in 1991.” In Durant, J.(ed.), Biotechnology in Public. London: Science Museum.Google Scholar
Martin, S. and Tait, J. (1992). “Attitudes of Selected Public Groups in the UK to Biotechnology.” In Durant, J.(ed.), Biotechnology in Public. London: Science Museum.Google Scholar
Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., and Randers, J. (1992). Beyond the Limits. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Mepham, T.B. (1989). “Criteria for the Public Acceptability of Biotechnological Innovations in Animal Production.” In Heap, R.B., Prosser, C.G., and Lamming, G.E.(eds.), Biotechnology in Growth Regulation. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Mepham, T.B. (1992). “Public Health Implications of Bovine Somatotrophin Use in Dairying: Discussion Paper.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 85:736–39.Google Scholar
Mepham, T.B. (1993). “Approaches to the Ethical Evaluation of Animal Biotechnologies.” Animal Production 57:353–59.Google Scholar
National Institutes of Health (1991). “Technology Assessment Conference Statement on Bovine Somatotropin.” Journal of the American Medical Association 265:1423–25.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1993). Managing Global Genetic Resources: Livestock. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Natural Environment Research Council (1993). Evidence to the House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology: “Regulation of the UK Biotechnology Industry and Global Competitiveness.” HL Paper 80-I.Google Scholar
Pacey, A. (1974). The Maze of Ingenuity. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Popper, K.R. (1972). Conjectures and Refutations. 4th edition (revised). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of Chaos. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Pursel, V.G. et al.(1989). “Genetic Engineering of Livestock.” Science 244:1281–88.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1973). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Regan, T. (1985). “The Case for Animal Rights.” In Singer, P.(ed.), In Defence of Animals. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rollin, B.E. (1986). “‘The Frankenstein Thing’: The Moral Impact of Genetic Engineering of Animals on Society and Future Science.” In Evans, J.W. and Hollaender, J.(eds.), Genetic Engineering of Animals. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Rollin, B.E. (1989). The Unheeded Cry: Animal Consciousness, Animal Pain and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seidel, G.E. (1993). “Resource Requirements for Transgenic Livestock Research.” Journal of Animal Science (supplement) 71:26–33.Google Scholar
Tait, J. (1993). Evidence to the House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology: “Regulation of the UK Biotechnology Industry and Global Competitiveness.” HL Paper 80-I.Google Scholar
Tucker, G.A. (1994). “Techniques for Genetic Manipulation of Crops and Microorganisms.” In Mepham, T.B., Tucker, G.A., and Wiseman, J.(eds), Issues in Agricultural Bioethics. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Tudge, C. (1992.) Last Animals at the Zoo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verhoog, H. (1992). “The Concept of Intrinsic Value and Transgenic Animals.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5:147–60.Google Scholar
Warnock, M. (1984.) A Question of Life. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Willeberg, P. (1993). “Bovine Somatotropin and Clinical Mastitis: Epidemiological Assessment of the Welfare Risk.” Livestock Production Science 36:55–66.Google Scholar
Wilmut, I. (1994). “Modification of Farm Animals by Genetic Engineering and Immunomodulation.” In Mepham, T.B., Tucker, G.A., and Wiseman, J.(eds.), Issues in Agricultural Bioethics. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press (in press).Google Scholar
Yates, F.E. (1993). “Self-Organizing Systems.” In Boyd, C.A.R. and Noble, D.(eds.), The Logic of Life: The Challenge of Integrative Physiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, J.Z. (1978). Programs of the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar