Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:42:44.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stuck in the Pleistocene: Rationality and Evolved Social Roles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Derek Reiners
Derek Reiners*
Affiliation:
Indiana University, USA
*
Correspondence should be addressed to Department of Political Science, Indiana University, Woodburn Hall 210, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access

Abstract

This article argues that an evolutionary psychological perspective could be useful for developing second-generation models of rationality. The standard model of complete rationality is inadequate primarily on the grounds that it generates predictions inconsistent with empirical data. The model is extremely useful and should not, nor cannot, realistically be dismissed. It accurately predicts outcomes in markets and openly competitive situations. However, behavioral phenomena that the standard theory has trouble explaining—such as mass contribution to public goods, types of cooperation, and altruism—are usually treated as “anomalies.” These outcomes are too prevalent and important to be treated as such. I attempt to build upon Elinor Ostrom's proposal to generate new models of rationality, which recognize the use of heuristics, norms, and rules, and are able to better account for empirical findings. I argue that second-generation models would benefit from the acknowledgment of social roles—but more specifically, evolved social roles. Evolved social roles are intuitive bundles of norms, expectations, and social strategies that shape an individual's player type. If we extend rationality to incorporate underlying bio-psychological mechanisms, such as evolved social strategies and evolved social roles, then we gain an understanding of a wider array of decision-making processes and social phenomena.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , September 2001 , pp. 139 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. (1987). The Biology of Moral Systems. Hawthorne, NY: Gruyter.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1976). “Altruism, Egoism, and Genetic Fitness: Economics and Sociobiology.” In Becker, G. (ed.), An Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1996). Accounting for Tastes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, L. (1990). Reciprocity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. (1998). Game Theory and the Social Contract. Volume 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss. Volume 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. (1998). “Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1):73–112.Google Scholar
Buss, D.M. (1990). “Evolutionary Social Psychology: Prospects and Pitfalls.” Motivations and Emotion 14 (4):265–86.Google Scholar
Buss, D.M. (1995). “Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science.” Psychological Inquiry 6 (1):1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D.M. (1999). Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Needham Heights, MA; Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. (1989). “The Logic of Social Exchange: Has Natural Selection Shaped How Humans Reason? Studies with the Wason Selection Task.” Cognition 31:187–276.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1989). “Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Part II. Case Study: A Computational Theory of Social Exchange.” Ethology and Sociobiology 10:51–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1992). “Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture: Part II. A Computational Theory of Social Exchange.” Ethology and Sociobiology 10:51–97.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1994). “Better Than Rational: Evolutionary Psychology and the Invisible Hand.” American Economic Review 84:327–332.Google Scholar
Crawford, S.E.S. and Ostrom, E. (1995). “A Grammar of Institutions.” The American Political Science Review 89:582–600Google Scholar
Cummins, D.D. (1999). “Cheater Detection Is Modified by Social Rank: The Impact of Dominance on the Evolution of Cognitive Functions.” Evolution and Human Behavior 20:229–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M. (1982). “Some Caveats about Cultural Transmission Models”. Human Ecology 10:401–8.Google Scholar
Daly, M. (1989). “Parent-Offspring Conflict and Violence in Evolutionary Perspective.” In Bell, R.W. and Bell, N.J. (eds.), Sociobiology and the Social Sciences. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, M. and Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google ScholarPubMed
Daly, M. and Wilson, M. (1998). The Truth about Cinderella: A Darwinian View of Parental Love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixit, A.K. and Nalebuff, B.J. (1991). Thinking Strategically. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, J.A. (1991). “Rationality and Interpretation: Parliamentary Elections in Early Stuart England.” In Monroe, K. (ed.), The Economic Approach to Politics: A Critical Reassessment of the Theory of Rational Action. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Fisek, M.H. and Ofshe, R. (1970). “The Process of Status Evolution.” Sociometry 33:327–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R.H. (1988). Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Frank, R.H. (1993). “The Strategic Role of Emotions: Reconciling Over- and Undersocialized Accounts of Behavior.” Rationality and Society 5 (2):160–84.Google Scholar
Garcia, J. and Koelling, R.A. (1966). “Relation of Cue to Consequence in Avoidance Learning.” Psychonomic Science 4:123–24.Google Scholar
Green, D. and Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. (1964). “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior.” Parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1–52.Google Scholar
Hechter, M. (1994). “The Role of Values in Rational Choice Theory.” Rationality and Society 6 (3):318–33.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2001). “De Gustibus Est Disputandum.” Social Forces 79:1131–63.Google Scholar
Kreps, D.M. (1990). “Corporate Culture and Economic Theory.” In Alt, J. and Shepsle, K. (eds.), Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindenberg, S. (1992). “The Explanation of Preferences.” In Goor, Van (ed.) Empirisce Sociologie als Oprach. Groningen: MB-Boek.Google Scholar
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1961). “Cause and Effect in Biology.” Science 134:1501–6.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (1990). “Managerial Dilemmas: Political Leadership in Hierarchies.” In Cook, K. and Levi, M. (eds.), The Limits of Rationality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Monroe, K. (1994). “A Fat Lady in a Corset: Altruism and Social Theory.” American Journal of Political Science 38:861–93.Google Scholar
Morris, D. (1967). The Naked Ape. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Morrow, J.D. (1994). Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Orians, G.H. and Heerwagen, J.H. (1992). “Evolved Responses to Landscapes.” In Barkow, J. et al. (eds.), The Adapted Mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1986). “An Agenda for the Study of Institutions.” Public Choice 48:3–25.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1998). “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action.” Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997. The American Political Science Review 92:1–22.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1999). “Coping with Tragedies of the Commons.” Annual Review of Political Science 2:493–535.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2000). “Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14:137–58.Google Scholar
Reiners, D. (2000). “Evolutionary Social Psychology of the Self.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Sociological Association, Washington DC, August 12–14.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. (1997). The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Riker, W. and Ordeshook, R. (1968). “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Sociological Review 62:25–42.Google Scholar
Searing, D.D. (1991). “Roles, Rules, and Rationality in the New Institutionalism.” The American Political Science Review 85:1239–60.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1977). “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6:317–44.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1981). The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Sober, E. and Wilson, D.S. (1998). Unto Others: The Evolution and Pyschology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
Stryker, S. (1987). “Identity Theory: Developments and Extensions.” In Yardley, K. and Honess, T. (eds.), Self and Identity: Psychosocial Perspectives. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1979). The Evolution of Human Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (1971). “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism.” Quarterly Review of Biology 46:35–57.Google Scholar
Whitmeyer, J. (1997). “Endogamy as a Basis for Ethnic Behavior.” Sociological Theory 15:162–78.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G.W. (1984). “Reciprocal Food Sharing in Vampire Bats.” Nature 308:181–84.Google Scholar
Williams, G. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (1971). The Insect Societies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, R. (1994). The Moral Animal: Evolutionary Psychology and Everyday Life. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar