Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T22:31:06.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Social Cage: Human Nature and the Evolution of Society. Alexandra Maryanski, Jonathan H. Turner, Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press,1992, 213 pp. US$39.50 cloth. ISBN 0-8047-2002-9. US$12.95 paper. ISBN 0-8047-2003-7. Stanford University Press, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Frank Kemp Salter
Frank Kemp Salter*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute, Germany
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 118 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balch, S.H. (1986). “The Neutered Civil Servant': Eunuchs, Celibates, Abductees, and the Maintenance of Organizational Loyalty.” In White, E. and Losco, J., (eds.), Biology and Bureaucracy: Public Administration and Public Policy from the Perspective of Evolutionary, Genetic and Neurobiological Theory. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Cashdan, E. (1983). “Territoriality Among Human Foragers: Ecological Models and an Application to Four Bushman Groups.” Current Anthropology 24:47–66.Google Scholar
Cashdan, E. (1989). “Hunters and Gatherers: Economic Behavior in Bands.” In Plattner, S., (ed.), Economic Anthropology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Caton, H.P. (1988). The Politics of Progress: The Origins and Development of the Commercial Republic, 1600-1835. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1874). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1972). Love and Hate: The Natural History of Behavior Patterns. Translated byStrachan, G.. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1979). The Biology of Peace and War: Men, Animals, and Aggression. Translated byMosbacher, E.. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human Ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ember, C.R. (1978). “Myths about Hunter-Gatherers.” Ethology 17:439–48.Google Scholar
Geiger, G. (1988). “On the Evolutionary Origins and Function of Political Power.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 11:235–50.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Konner, M. and Shostak, M. (1986). “Ethnographic Romanticism and the Idea of Human Nature: Parallels between Samoa and !Kung San.” In Biesele, M., Gordon, R., and Lee, R., (eds.), The Past and Future of !Kung Ethnography. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. (1966). On Aggression. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Peterson, N. (1975). “Hunter-Gatherer Territoriality: The Perspective from Australia.” American Anthropologist 77:53–68.Google Scholar
Reynolds, V. (1973). “Ethology of Social Change.” In Renfrew, C., (ed.), The Explanation of Cultural Change: Models in Prehistory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Ross, E.A. (1970). Social Control. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.Google Scholar
Salter, F.K. (1995). Emotions in Command: A Naturalistic Study of Institutional Dominance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. In press.Google Scholar
Tiger, L. and Fox, R. (1989/1971). The Imperial Animal. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. (1981). “Measuring the Impact of Social Ties on Nutritional Status among the !Kung San.” Social Science Information 20:641–78.Google Scholar