Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T22:32:03.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of The Dialectical Biologist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Robert E. Rosenwein
Robert E. Rosenwein*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Relations, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , August 1989 , pp. 116 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ann Arbor Science for the People Editorial Collective, eds. (1977). Biology as a Social Weapon. Burgess Publishing Co.: Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Collins, H. M. (1985). Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C. (1984). “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptionist Programme.” In Sober, E. (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K., and Mulkay, M., eds., (1983). Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1972). “Testing the Theory of Natural Selection.” Nature 236:181–182.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1977). “Biological Determinism as a Social Weapon.” In Ann Arbor Science for the People Editorial Collective (eds.), Biology as a Social Weapon. Burgess Press: Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp. 6–17.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1978). “Fitness, Survival and Optimality.” In Horn, D. H., Mitchell, R. and Stairs, G. R. (eds.), Analysis of Ecological Systems. Ohio State University Press: Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1979). “Sociobiology as as Adaptionist Program.” Behavioral Science 24:5–14.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1982). “Organism and Environment.” In Plotkin, H.C. (ed.), Learning, Development and Culture: Essays in Evolutionary Epistemology. New York, N. Y.: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 151–172.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1984). “Adaptation.” In Sober, E. (ed.), Conceptuallssues in Evolutionary Biology: An Anthology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mulkay, M. (1979). “Knowledge and Utility: Implications for the Sociology of Knowledge.” Social Studies of Science 9:63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segerstrale, U. (1986). “Colleagues in Conflict: An ‘In Vivo’ Analysis of the Sociobiology Controversy.” Biology and Philosophy 1:53–87.Google Scholar