Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:55:13.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Natural Science of Ethics: A Response to Three Commentators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Larry Arnhart
Get access

Extract

I am grateful to the three commentators for raising many good questions that I shall have to ponder for a long time. In this brief response, I can comment on only a few of their points.

Type
Roundtable Response
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , August 1992 , pp. 177 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Geertz, C.(1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibbons, A.(1992). “Chimps: More Diverse Than a Barrel of Monkeys.” Science 255:287–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I.(1951). Critique of Judgment. Trans. Bernard, J.H.New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Marglin, S.A.(1990). “Towards the Decolonization of the Mind.” In Marglin, F.A.and Marglin, S.A.(eds.), Dominating Knowledge: Development, Culture, and Resistance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M.(1990). The Roots of Thinking. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar