Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:39:02.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maternal and Paternal Responsibilities to the Fetus Compared: A Trans-Atlantic Comment∗

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

J. K. Mason
J. K. Mason*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, Scotland
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Paternal-Fetal Conflict
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , August 1994 , pp. 249 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buck v. Bell (1927). 274 US 200.Google Scholar
Dyer, C. (1992). “Spreading HIV Is Not an Offence.” British Medical Journal 305:11.Google Scholar
Re F (in utero) [1988.] 2 All E R 193.Google Scholar
Gardner, M.J. et al.(1990). “Results of Case-Control Study of Leukaemia and Lymphoma among Young People near Sellafield Nuclear Plant in West Cumbria.” British Medical Journal 300:423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeran, R. (1992). “Scientific and Legal Standards of Proof in Environmental Injury Cases.” Lancet 339:671–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, J., Chairman, (1989). Review of the Guidance on the Research Use of Fetuses and Fetal Material (Cm 762). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
R v. R [1991]. 4 All E R 481.Google Scholar
Reay v. British Nuclear Fuels plc, Hope v. same (1993). The Independent, 22 November 1993; see Brahams, D.(1993). “Cancer Cluster around Nuclear Installation.” Lancet 342:981.Google Scholar
S v. HM Advocate (1989). S L T 469.Google Scholar