Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T10:31:04.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Human Genome Diversity Project: Ethical Concerns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Udo Schüklenk*
Affiliation:
University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: The Human Genome Diversity Project
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayanian, J.Z. (1994). “Race, Class and the Quality of Medical Care.” Journal of the American Medical Association 271: 1207–8.Google Scholar
British Medical Association (1999). Biotechnology, Weapons and Humanity. Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Kerin, J. (1999). “Genetic Research and Biological Weapons: The Ethics of the Human Genome Project.” Monash Bioethics Review 18 (3): 110(suppl).Google Scholar
Menon, M.G.K. et al., eds. (1999). Human Genome Research: Emerging Ethical, Legal, Social and Economic Issues. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Schüklenk, U. (1998). “Unethical Perinatal HIV Transmission Trials Establish Bad Precedent.” Bioethics 12: 312–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schüklenk, U. (1999). “South African Government's Response to AIDS Crisis Is Sound.” British Medical Journal 318: 1143.Google Scholar
Schüklenk, U. et al. (1997). “The Ethics of Genetic Research on Sexual Orientation.” Hastings Center Report 27 (4): 613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shriver, M.D. et al. (1997). “Ethics-Affiliation Estimation by Use of Population-Specific DNA Markers.” American Journal of Human Genetics 60: 957–64.Google Scholar