Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:08:57.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embryo disposal practices in IVF clinics in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Andrea D. Gurmankin ,
Dominic Sisti  and
Arthur L. Caplan
Andrea D. Gurmankin
Affiliation:
Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 30 College Ave., New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1293, USA [email protected]
Dominic Sisti
Affiliation:
Center for Bioethics & Department of Medical Ethics, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Market Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA
Arthur L. Caplan
Affiliation:
Center for Bioethics & Department of Medical Ethics, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Market Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA
Get access

Abstract

Background.

The moral status of the human embryo is particularly controversial in the United States, where one debate has centered on embryos created in excess at in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinics. Little has been known about the disposal of these embryos.

Methods.

We mailed anonymous, self-administered questionnaires to directors of 341 American IVF clinics.

Results.

217 of 341 clinics (64 percent) responded. Nearly all (97 percent) were willing to create and cryopreserve extra embryos. Fewer, but still a majority (59 percent), were explicitly willing to avoid creating extras. When embryos did remain in excess, clinics offered various options: continual cryopreservation for a charge (96 percent) or for no charge (4 percent), donation for reproductive use by other couples (76 percent), disposal prior to (60 percent) or following (54 percent) cryopreservation, and donation for research (60 percent) or embryologist training (19 percent). Qualifications varied widely among those personnel responsible for securing couples' consent for disposal and for conducting disposal itself. Some clinics performed a religious or quasi-religious disposal ceremony. Some clinics required a couple's participation in disposal; some allowed but did not require it; some others discouraged or disallowed it.

Conclusions.

The disposal of human embryos created in excess at American IVF clinics varies in ways suggesting both moral sensitivity and ethical divergence.

Type
Guest Commentary
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , September 2003 , pp. 4 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Green, R.M., “Stem Cell Research: A Target Article Collection: Part III—Determining Moral Status,” Am J Bioeth, 2002, 2(1):20–30.Google Scholar
2.McCartney, J.J., “Embryonic Stem Cell Research and Respect for Human Life: Philosophical and Legal Reflections,” Albany Law Rev, 2002, 65(3):597–624.Google Scholar
3.McGee, G. and Caplan, A.L., “What's in the Dish?” Hastings Center Report 1999; 29(2):36–8.Google Scholar
4.Strong, C., “The Moral Status of Preembryos, Embryos, Fetuses, and Infants,” J Med Philos, 1997, 22(5):457–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Robeznieks, A., “Researchers Ponder Best Use of 400,000 Stored Embryos,” AMNews, June 16, 2003.Google Scholar
6.Wade, N., “Clinics hold more embryos than had been thought,” New York Times, Section A, Page24: May 9, 2003.Google Scholar
7.Hoffman, D.I., Zellman, G.L., Fair, C.C., Mayer, J.F., Zeitz, J.G., Gibbons, W.E., and Turner, T.G. Jr., Society for Assisted Reproduction Technology (SART) and RAND. “Cryopreserved Embryos in the United States and Their Availability for Research,” Fertility & Sterility, 2003, 79(5):1063–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.FitzPatrick, W., “Surplus Embryos, Nonreproductive Cloning, and the Intend/Foresee Distinction,” Hastings Center Report, 2003, 33(3):29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Laurence, C., “Childless Couples ‘Adopt’ America's Leftover Embryos. George W. Bush and Anti-abortion Campaigners are Backing the Use of IVF's ‘Unwanted Babies’,” Sunday Telegraph, (London), March 30, 2003, p. 35.Google Scholar
10.Vastag, B., “UK Licenses Human Embryo Creation: ‘Dolly’ Cloner to Create Embryos for Research,” JAMA, 2003, 290(4):449–50.Google Scholar
11.Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority: Code of Practice, fifth edition, 2001, available at <http://www.hfea.gov.uk/HFEAPublications/CodeofPractice>..>Google Scholar
12.Ethics Committee, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, “Donating Spare Embryos for Embryonic Stem-Cell Research,” Fertility & Sterility, 2002, 78(5):957–960.Google Scholar
13.Caplan, A.L., “The Problem with ‘Embryo Adoption’,” MSNBC.com: <http://www.bioethics.net/msnbc/msnbc.php?task=view&articleID=795>, June 24, 2003.,+June+24,+2003.>Google Scholar
14.Soderstrom-Anttila, V., Foudila, T., Ripatti, U., and Siegberg, R., “Embryo Donation: Outcome and Attitudes Among Embryo Donors and Recipients,” Human Reproduction, 2001, 16(6):1120–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Van Voorhis, B., Grinstead, D., Sparks, A., Gerard, J., and Weir, R., “Establishment of a Successful Donor Embryo Program: Medical, Ethical and Policy Issues,” Fertility and Sterility, 1999, 71(4):604–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.www.Sart.org. Website of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies, accessed March 2002.Google Scholar
17.Wade, N., “List of Stem Cell Researchers Shows Hands Had Been Tied,” New York Times, August 28, 2001, A10.Google Scholar
18.de Jong, D., Eijkemans, M.J., Beckers, N.G., Pruijsten, R.V., Fauser, B.C., and Macklon, N.S., “The Added Value of Embryo Cryopreservation to Cumulative Ongoing Pregnancy Rates per IVF Treatment: Is Cryopreservation Worth the Effort?” Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics, 2002, 19(12):561–8.Google Scholar
19.Schnorr, J.A., Doviak, M.J., Muasher, S.J., and Jones, H.W. Jr., “Impact of a Cryopreservation Program on the Multiple Pregnancy Rate Associated with Assisted Reproductive Technologies,” Fertility & Sterility, 2001, 75(1):147–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.ASRM, “Disposition of Abandoned Embryos,” American Society for Reproductive Medicine's Ethics Committee, July 1996.Google Scholar