Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T07:48:12.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Duality of Human Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Trudi C. Miller*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, USA
Get access

Abstract

To update the view of human nature that undergirds eighteenth-century British/American political economy, this article reviews literature from diverse subfields of psychobiology. Findings on the structure, function, and evolution of the human brain confirm the duality between reason and passion that is at the core of the science of Hobbes. Contemporary findings across fields indicate that people become emotionally attached to objects, including verbal abstractions, through experiences with pleasure and pain. In contrast, human reasoning is essentially scientific. The duality between passionate motivation and humanity's unique capacity for reasoning makes political science important. By applying the scientific method to the subject of politics, people can design institutions that channel quasi-rational behavior toward outcomes that are mutually beneficial, rather than mutually destructive. Defining human nature correctly is the key to political science, and Smith's addition of the passion of sympathy to Hobbes's narrow definition of human motivation is essential.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, V.L., ed. (1970). Psychological Factors in Poverty. Chicago: Markham Publishing.Google Scholar
Andreasen, N.C. (1984). The Broken Brain. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Aranson, P.H. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1985). “Public Interest, Private Interest, and the Democratic Polity.” In Benjamin, R. and Elkin, S.L. (eds.), The Democratic State. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1935). From Natural Science, Psychology, Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Wheelwright, Philip, ed. New York: Doubleday, Doran.Google Scholar
Arms, K. and Camp, P.S. (1987). Biology. New York: Saunders College Publishing.Google Scholar
Ashton, H. (1987). Brain Systems Disorders and Psychotropic Drugs. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Benson, D.F. and Zaidel, E., eds. (1985). The Dual Brain. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Benton, D. and Brain, P.F. (1987). “The Role of Opioid Mechanisms in Social Interaction and Attachment.” In Rodgers, R.J. and Cooper, S.J. (eds.), Endorphins, Opiates and Behavioral Processes. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Boulding, K.E. (1956). The Image. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B. (1985). Human Evolution. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Capitanio, J.P., Weissberg, M., and Reite, M. (1985). “Biology of Maternal Behavior: Recent Findings and Implications.” In Reite, M. and Field, T. (eds.), The Psychobiology of Attachment and Separation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eccles, J.C. (1989). Evolution of the Brain. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Everitt, B.J. and Keverne, E.B. (1979). “Models of Depression Based on Behavioural Observations of Experimental Animals.” In Paykel, E.S. and Coppen, A. (eds.), Psychopharmacology of Affective Disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Field, T. (1985). “Attachment as Psychobiological Attunement: Being on the Same Wavelength.” In Reite, M. and Field, T. (eds.), The Psychobiology of Attachment and Separation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fox, N.A. and Davidson, R.J. (1984). The Psychobiology of Affective Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Frank, R.H. (1988). Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Frodi, A. (1985). “Variations in Parental and Nonparental Response to Early Infant Communication.” In Reite, M. and Field, T. (eds.), The Psychobiology of Attachment and Separation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glees, P. (1988). The Human Brain. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grofman, B. and Feld, S.L. (1988). “Rousseau's General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective.” The American Political Science Review 82(2):567–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, B., Owen, G., and Feld, S.L. (1983). “Thirteen Theorems in Search of the Truth.” Theory and Decision 15:261–78.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (1991). “Acting Together, Contributing Together.” Rationality and Society 3:365–80.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1968). Leviathan. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Jacob, F. (1982). The Possible and the Actual. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, G.R. (1986). “Kin Selection, Socialization, and Patriotism: An Integrating Theory.” Politics and the Life Sciences 4:127–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G.R. (1987). “In the Name of the Fatherland: An Analysis of Kin Term Usage in Patriotic Speech and Literature.” International Political Science Review 8:165–74.Google Scholar
Johnson, G.R., Ratwik, S.H., and Sawyer, T.J. (1987). “The Evocative Significance of Kin Terms in Patriotic Speech.” In Reynolds, V., Falger, V., and Vine, I. (eds.), The Sociobiology of Ethnocentrism: Evolutionary Dimensions of Xenophobia, Discrimination, Racism and Nationalism. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (1984). The Nature of The Child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kelly, A.E. and Stinus, L. (1984). “Neuroanatomical and Neurochemical Substrates of Affective Behavior.” In Fox, N.A. and Davidson, R.J. (eds.), The Psychobiology of Affective Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Khachaturian, H., et al. (1985). “Anatomy of the CNS Opioid Systems.” Trends in Neurosciences 8:111–19.Google Scholar
Kraemer, G.W. (1985). “Effects of Differences in Early Social Experience on Primate Neurobiological-Behavioral Development.” In Reite, M. and Field, T. (eds.), The Psychobiology of Attachment and Separation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1960). Two Treatises of Government. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacLean, P.D. (1975). “On the Evolution of Three Mentalities.” Man-Environment Systems 5:213–24.Google Scholar
MacLean, P.D. (1987). “The Midline Frontolimbic Cortex and the Evolution of Crying and Laughter.” In Perecman, E. (ed.), The Frontal Lobes Revisited. New York: IRBN Press.Google Scholar
MacLean, P.D. (1990). The Triune Brain in Evolution. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Martinez, J.L. Jr. (1986). “Memory: Drugs and Hormones.” In Martinez, J.L. Jr. and Kesner, R.P. (eds.), Learning and Memory: A Biological View. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Masters, R.D. (1989). The Nature of Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Masters, R.D. (1990). “Evolutionary Biology and Political Theory.” American Political Science Review 84:195212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard-Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, T.C. (1989). “The Operation of Democratic Institutions.” Public Administration Review 49:511–21.Google Scholar
Miller, T.C. (1990a). “Synthesizing Normative and Behavioral Theory for the Design of Social Structures.” In Nagel, S.S. (ed.), Policy Theory and Policy Evaluation. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Miller, T.C. (1990b). “Normative Political Science.” Policy Studies Review 9:232–46.Google Scholar
Miller, T.C. (1991). “Political Design Science: A Synthesis of Traditional Values and Behavioral ism.” In Perry, J.L. (ed.), Research in Public Administration. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Miller, T.C. (1992a). “What Adam Smith and James Madison Would Say About the American Political Economy Today.” Public Administration Review 52:7076.Google Scholar
Miller, T.C. (1992b). “The Implications of Self-Interest.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 4:395412.Google Scholar
Miller, T.C. (1993). “Economics: Science or Ideology?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics, New York.Google Scholar
Ornstein, R. (1991). The Evolution of Consciousness. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. (1985). “Mood Changes.” In Vinkin, P.J., Bruyn, G.W., and Klawans, H.L. (eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology I. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. (1986a). “The Neurochemistry of Behavior.” Annual Review of Psychology 37:77107.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. (1986b). “The Psychobiology of Prosocial Behaviors: Separation Distress, Play, and Altruism.” In Zahn-Waxler, C., Cummings, E.M., and Iannotti, R. (eds.), Altruism and Aggression: Biological and Social Origins. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. (1989a). “Les Circuits des Emotions.” Science et Vie: 5867. Translated by Panksepp, J..Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. (1989b). “The Psychobiology of Emotions: The Animal Side of Human Feelings.” In Gairetti, G. and Coltogirone, C. (eds.), Experimental Brain Research Series 18: Emotions and the Dual Brain. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. and Bishop, P. (1981). “An Autoradiographic Map of (3H) Diprenorphine Binding in Rat Brain: Effects of Social Interaction.” Brain Research Bulletin 7:405–10.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. and Lensing, P. (1991). “Brief Report: A Synopsis of an Open-Trial of Naltrexone Treatment of Autism with Four Children.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 21:135–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panksepp, J., Siviy, S.M., and Normansell, L.A. (1985). “Brain Opioids and Social Emotions.” In Reite, M. and Field, T. (eds.), The Psychobiology of Attachment and Separation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Poundstone, W. (1992). Prisoner's Dilemma. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. (1992). “Game Theory Defined: What it Is and Is Not.” Rationality and Society 4:7494.Google Scholar
Reite, M. and Field, T. (1985). The Psychobiology of Attachment and Separation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Restak, R.M. (1984). The Brain. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Restak, R.M. (1988). The Mind. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Rodgers, R.J. and Cooper, S.J. (1988). Endorphins, Opiates and Behavioral Processes. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Sahley, T.L. and Panksepp, J. (1987). “Brain Opioids and Autism: An Updated Analysis of Possible Linkages.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 17:201–16.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1987). On Ethics and Economics. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1909). Wealth of Nations. New York: P.F. Collier and Son.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1966). Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York: Augustus M. Kelly.Google Scholar
Stebbins, G.L. (1982). Darwin to DNA: Molecules to Humanity. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Stellar, J.R. and Stellar, E. (1985). The Neurobiology of Motivation and Reward. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Thompson, R.F. and Donegan, N.H. (1986). Learning and Memory: A Biological View. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, R.L. (1971). “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism.” Quarterly Review of Biology 46:3557.Google Scholar
Trivers, R.L. (1985). Social Evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
Vincent, J.D. (1990). The Biology of Emotions. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, Inc.Google Scholar
Watson, W.A. (1981). Physiological Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (1978). On Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.Q. (1993). “The Moral Sense.” American Political Science Review 87:111.Google Scholar
Youniss, J. (1986). “Development in Reciprocity through Friendship.” In Zahn-Waxler, C., Cummings, E.M. and Iannotti, R. (eds.), Altruism and Aggression: Biological and Social Origins. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar