Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T10:41:52.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biopolitics in 1983

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Steven A. Peterson  and
Albert Somit
Steven A. Peterson
Affiliation:
Division of Social Sciences, Alfred University, Alfred, New York 14802
Albert Somit
Affiliation:
Office of the President, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901
Get access

Extract

In this bibliographic essay, we continue our annual updating of the biopolitics literature (see Somit et al., 1980; Peterson, Somit, and Slagter, 1982; Peterson, Somit, and Brown, 1983). We have identified 81 items appearing in 1983 (down a bit from last year's total of 93): 2 books (Corning, 1983b; Flohr and Tbnnesmann, 1983a), 22 full articles published in journals, 18 chapters in books (excluding reprints of previously published materials), 25 conference presentations, 4 master's theses and doctoral dissertations, and 10 commentaries, review essays, etc. It seems worth noting that 12 of the 80 works appearing in 1983 were published in the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences, Politics and the Life Sciences.

Type
Articles and Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , August 1984 , pp. 76 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Peterson, Steven A., Somit, Albert, and Brown, Barbara (1983). “Biopolitics in 1982.” Politics and the Life Sciences 2: 76–80.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A., Somit, Albert, and Slagter, Robert (1982). “Biopolitics: 1981–1982 Update.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1: 52–57.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, Peterson, Steven A., Richardson, William D., and Goldfischer, David S. (1980). The Literature of Biopolitics. DeKalb, Ill.: Northern Illinois University, Program for Biosocial Research.Google Scholar

1983 Bibliography

Key:Google Scholar
1—Case for biopoliticsGoogle Scholar
2—Ethological/evolutionary/sociobiological approachGoogle Scholar
3—Physiological approachGoogle Scholar
4—Research methodsGoogle Scholar
5—Public policy aspectsGoogle Scholar
6—Metaphoric use of biology.Google Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. Jr. (1983). “Comment on Schubert's View of Paradigmatic Evolution.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1: 110–112. (1)Google Scholar
Baer, Denise, and Bositis, David A. (1983a). “Biology, Gender, and Politics: An Assessment and Critique.” Women and Politics 3: 29–66. (2,3)Google Scholar
Baer, Denise, and Bositis, David A. (1983b). “The Political Socialization of Gender: What Contribution Biology?” Politics and the Life Sciences 1: 125–134. (2,3)Google Scholar
Barner-Barry, Carol (1983). “Zum Verhältnis zwischen Ethologie und Politik.” In Flohr, Heiner and Tönnesmann, Wolfgang (eds.). (2)Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. (1983a). “Biomedical Policy.” In Nagel, Stuart (ed.), Encyclopedia of Policy Studies. New York: Marcel Dekker. (5)Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. (1983b). “Biopolicy and the Courts.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Philadelphia. (5)Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. (1983c). “Impacts of Developments in Human Genetic Technology on Public Policy.” Paper presented at the International Symposium on Forecasting, Philadelphia. (5)Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. (1983d). “Societal Responsibility and Genetic Disease.” In Darrough, M. and Blank, R. H. (eds.), Biological Differences and Social Equality. Boulder, Colo.: Greenwood Press. (5)Google Scholar
Caldwell, Lynton K. (1983a). “Biocracy: The Irrepressible Influence of Biology on Politics.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Seattle. (5)Google Scholar
Caldwell, Lynton K. (1983b). “International Aspects of Biotechnology.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Birmingham. (5)Google Scholar
Caldwell, Lynton K. (1983c). “Okologische Elemente einer am Uberleben orientierten Politik.” In Flohr, and Tönnesmann, (eds.). (5)Google Scholar
Cook, T. E. (1983). “‘Misbegotten Males?’ Innate Differences and Stratified Choice in the Subjection of Women.” Western Political Quarterly 36: 194–220. (1)Google Scholar
Corning, Peter (1983a). “Politik und Evolution.” In Flohr, and Tönnesmann, (eds.). (2)Google Scholar
Corning, Peter (1983b). The Synergism Hypothesis. New York: McGraw-Hill. (2)Google Scholar
Davies, James C. (1983). “The Proper Biological Study of Politics.” Political Psychology 4: 731–743. (1)Google Scholar
DeForest, Paul (1983a). “Cooperation and Conflict in Cross-national Molecular Biopolicy.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Seattle. (5)Google Scholar
DeForest, Paul (1983b). “The ‘Interests’ of the New Biotechnology.” Politics and the Life Sciences 2: 52–55. (5)Google Scholar
DeGrazia, Alfred (1983). “Homo schizo: Instinct Delay in Human Nature and Behavior.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Philadelphia. (2)Google Scholar
Flohr, Heiner (1983a). “The Relevance of Biopolitics for Political Science in the Federal Republic of Germany.” Loccumer Protokolle (Evalgelische Akademie Loccum). (1)Google Scholar
Flohr, Heiner (1983b). “What is Biopolitics?” Paper presented at the meeting of the European Sociobiological Society, Brussels. (1)Google Scholar
Flohr, Heiner, and Tönnesmann, Wolfgang, eds., (1983a). Politik und Biologie. Berlin: Verlag Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Flohr, Heiner, and Tönnesmann, Wolfgang, eds., (1983b). “Selbstverständnis und Grundlagen von Biopolitics.” In Flohr, und Tönnesmann, (eds.). (1)Google Scholar
Hartigan, Richard S. (1983). “Genes and Myth.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Birmingham. (2)Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel M. Jr. (1983a). “Sociobiology, Social Biology, and the Social Sciences.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 6: 186–192. (2)Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel M. Jr. (1983b). “Die Ursprünge des Staates.” In Flohr, and Tönnesmann, (eds.). (2)Google Scholar
Jacobson, Todd S. (1983). “Schematic Processing on Non-political Information.” , State University of New York at Stony Brook. (3)Google Scholar
Jaros, Dean, and White, Elizabeth S. (1983). “Sex, Endocrines, and Political Behavior.” Women and Politics 3: 129–146. (3)Google Scholar
Jones, Diane Carlson (1983). “Power Structures and Perceptions of Power Holders in Same-sex Groups of Young Children.” Women and Politics 3: 147–164. (2)Google Scholar
Kay, Susan Ann, and Meikle, Douglas B. (1983). “Political Ideology, Sociobiology, and the U.S. Women's Rights Movement.” Women and Politics 3: 67–96. (2)Google Scholar
Kitchin, William (1983). “The Neuropolitical Dimension of Domestic and Foreign Policy Decisions.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Philadelphia. (3)Google Scholar
Kort, Fred (1983). “An Evolutionary-neurobiological Explanation of Political Behavior and the Lumsden-Wilson ‘thousand year rule.”’ Journal of Social and Biological Structures 6: 219–230. (2,3)Google Scholar
Lakoff, Sanford (1983a). “Biotechnology and Economic Development.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Seattle. (5)Google Scholar
Lakoff, Sanford (1983b). “Commentary on Zilinskas's Article.” Politics and the Life Sciences 2: 59–61. (5)Google Scholar
Lane, Robert E. (1983). “Individualism and the Market Society.” In Roland Pennock, J. and Chapman, John W. (eds.), Liberal Democracy, NOMOS XXV. New York: New York University Press. (2)Google Scholar
Manheim, Jarol B. (1983). “Biology and Political Socialization: The Cognitive Connection.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1: 138–139. (3)Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1983a). “The Biological Nature of the State.” World Politics 35: 161–193. (2)Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1983b). “The Duties of Humanity: Legal and Moral Obligation in Rousseau's Thought.” In Eidlin, Fred (ed.), Constitutional Democracy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press. (2)Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1983c). “Ethologische Ansätze in der Politikwissenschaft.” In Flohr, and Tönnesmann, (eds.). (2)Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1983d). “Evolutionary Biology and Natural Right.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago. (2)Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1983e). “Explaining ‘Male Chauvinism’ and ‘Feminism’: Cultural Differences in Male and Female Reproductive Strategy.” Women and Politics 3: 165–210. (2)Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1983f). “Human Nature and Political Theory.” American Political Science Association, Chicago. (2)Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1983g). “Ostracism, Voice and Exit.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Law and Society Association, Denver. (2)Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1983h). “Social Biology and the Welfare State.” In Tomasson, Richard F. (ed.), Comparative Social Research. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press. (2)Google Scholar
McBride, Allen F. (1983). “The Effects of Health and Body Image on Political Participation and Perception of the Political System.” , Southern Illinois University. (3)Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut, and Lodge, Milton (1983). “Partisanship, Ideological Self-image, and Policy Preferences.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago. (4)Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. (1983a). “Biosoziale Korrelate Politischen Verhaltens.” In Flohr, and Tönnesmann, (eds.). (3)Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. (1983b). “The Body and Politics.” Southeastern Political Review 11: 147–156. (3)Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. (1983c). “The Psychobiology of Hypostatizing.” Micropolitics 2: 423–451. (3)Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. (1983d). “Why Policies don't Work: A Biocognitive Perspective.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago. (3, 5)Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A., and Somit, Albert (1983a). “Biology and Political Violence.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Oxford. (2,3)Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A., and Somit, Albert (1983b). “Punctuated Equilibria, Sociobiology, and Politics.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Birmingham. (2)Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A., Somit, Albert, and Brown, Barbara (1983). “Biopolitics in 1982.” Politics and the Life Sciences 2: 76–80. (1)Google Scholar
Pöhls, Uwe (1983). “Probleme Anthropologischer Erklarung politischen Verhaltens.” , University of Düsseldorf, Federal Republic of Germany. (2)Google Scholar
Rota, Franco P. (1983). “Politischen Wissenschaft und Ethologie.” , University of Munich, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany. (2)Google Scholar
Saetz, Stephen (1983). “Genetics, Homosexuals, and Public Policy.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Philadelphia. (5)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1983a). “Aging, Conservatism, and Judicial Behavior.” Micropolitics 3: 135–179. (3)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1983b). “The Biopolitics of Sex: Gender, Genetics and Epigenetics.” Women and Politics 3: 97–128. (2,3)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1983c). “The Evolution of Political Science.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1: 97–110. (1)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1983d). “Evolutionary Politics.” Western Political Quarterly 36: 175–193. (2)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1983e). “Psychobiological Politics.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 16: 535–576. (3)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1983f). “The Structure of Attention: A Critical Review.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 6: 65–80. (2)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1983g). “Two Versions of Pastoral: From A to Z.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1: 114–120. (1)Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. (1983a). “Biosocial Dimensions of Nutritional Status and Policy.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 6: 181–186. (5)Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. (1983b). “Conversational Behavior and the Measurement of Dominance in Small Group Political Decision-making.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Birmingham. (2,4)Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. (1983c). “Dominance and Political Behavior.” American Political Science Association, Chicago. (2)Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. (1983d). “Ethological Methods for Observing Small Group Political Decision Making.” Politics and the Life Sciences 2: 3–19. (2,4)Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. (1983e). “Famines in World Historic-political Retrospect.” Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 22: 27–45. (5)Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. (1983f). “Hungersnot als Politische Problem.” In Flohr, and Tönnesmann, (eds.). (5)Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. (1983g). “On Watering the Garden of Ethological Research in Political Science.” Politics and the Life Sciences 2: 35–38. (2,4)Google Scholar
Sharp, Carol, and Lodge, Milton (1983). “Partisan and Ideological Belief Systems: Do They Differ?” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago. (4)Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert (1983). Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (2)Google Scholar
Somit, Albert (1983). “Bureaucracy, Public Administration, and the Life Sciences.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago. (1)Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, and Slagter, Robert (1983). “Biopolitics: Heutiger Stand und weitere Entwicklung.” In Flohr, and Tönnesmann, (eds.). (1)Google Scholar
Watts, Meredith (1983). “Biopolitics and Gender.” Women and Politics 3: 1–28. (1)Google Scholar
White, Danny, Paulsmeyer, David, and Kleinman, Kenneth M. (1983). “Electrodermal Activity Correlations with Political Activity and Verbally Expressed Attitudes of Political Support.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago. (3,4)Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1983). “Bonds, Brains and Bureaucracy.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Philadelphia. (3)Google Scholar
Wiegele, Thomas C. (1983a). “Psycholinguistische Merkmale in den Reden von US – Präsidenten während internationaler Krisen.” In Flohr, and Tönnesmann, (eds.). (3, 4)Google Scholar
Wiegele, Thomas C. (1983b). “Psychophysiology and the Study of Political Behavior.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Birmingham. (3)Google Scholar
Willhoite, Fred H. Jr. (1983). “Biocultural Evolution and Political Ethics.” In Canavan, Francis J. (ed.), The Ethical Dimension of Political Life. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. (2)Google Scholar
Zilinskas, Raymond A. (1983). “New Biotechnology: Potential Problems, Likely Prospects.” Politics and the Life Sciences 2: 42–52. (5)Google Scholar
Zinnes, Dina (1983). “Winning Friends and Influencing People.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1: 112–114. (1)Google Scholar