Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:33:59.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biopolitics in 1982

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Steven A. Peterson ,
Albert Somit  and
Barbara Brown
Steven A. Peterson
Affiliation:
Division of Social Sciences, Alfred University, Alfred, New York 14802
Albert Somit
Affiliation:
Office of the President, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901
Barbara Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901
Get access

Extract

This essay represents a continuing update of the biopolitics bibliography (see Somit et aI., 1980; Peterson et al., 1982). We have recorded 93 items in our enumeration of biopolitical works which appeared in 1982. In this total are 1 book, 3 master's theses or doctoral dissertations, 30 published articles, monographs, or chapters in books, 49 conference papers, and 10 short commentaries (book reviews are not included in our tally).

Type
Articles and Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , August 1983 , pp. 76 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Peterson, Steven A., Somit, Albert, and Slagter, Robert (1982). “Biopolitics: 1980-1981 Update.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:52–57.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, Peterson, Steven A., Richardson, William D., and Goldfischer, David S. (1980). The Literature of Biopolitics. 2nd ed.DeKalb, Ill.: Program for Biosocial Research, Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar

1982 Bibliography

Key:Google Scholar
1—Case for biopoliticsGoogle Scholar
2—Ethology/sociobiology/evolutionGoogle Scholar
3—PhysiologyGoogle Scholar
4—Research methodsGoogle Scholar
5—Public policyGoogle Scholar
6—Biological metaphorGoogle Scholar
Andrus, Calvin (1982). “Policy Evaluation, Policy Preferences, and the Magnitude Measurement of Ideological Consistency.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (4)Google Scholar
Arnhart, Larry (1982). “Charles Darwin and the Declaration of Independence.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (2)Google Scholar
Baer, Denise, and Bositis, David A. (1982a). “Biology, Gender, and Politics: an Assessment and Critique.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Milwaukee. (3)Google Scholar
Baer, Denise, and Bositis, David A. (1982b). “The Political Socialization of Gender: What Contribution Biology?” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (3)Google Scholar
Barner-Barry, Carol (1982). “An Ethological Study of a Leadership Succession.” Ethology and Sociobiology 3:199–207. (2)Google Scholar
Beam, David R. (1982). “Biological Science and the Art of Government: A Comment.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:42–44. (5)Google Scholar
Bhaskaran, S. (1982). “Linkage between Malnutrition and Political Apathy—A Study in a Developing Nation—India.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Political Science Association, Rio de Janeiro. (3)Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. (1982a). “Bioethical Decisions: The Political Context and Challenges.” Bioethics Quarterly 3:163–179. (5)Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. (1982b). “Biomedical Issues and Political Science: A Time for Action.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Diego. (5)Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. (1982c). “Biopolicy: A Restatement of its Role in Politics and the Life Sciences.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:38–42. (5)Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. (1982d). “Genetic Engineering and Contemporary Democratic Theory.” World Futures 18:239–267. (5)Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. (1982e). “Legal Issues in Biomedical Research and Technology.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (5)Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. (1982f). “Public Policy Implications of Human Genetic Technology: Genetic Screening.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7:355–374. (5)Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. (1982g). “Theory, Policy, and Biomedical Issues.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (5)Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H., and McFeeley, Neil D. (1982). “The Right to Patent Life Forms or ‘An Invasion of the Spores?”’ Policy Perspectives 2:277–289. (5)Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H., McFeeley, Neil D., and Ostheimer, John M. (1982). “Biomedical Policy.” Policy Studies Review 1:789–799. (5)Google Scholar
Bluhm, William T. (1982). “A Response to Hines's ‘Biopolitics and the Evolution of Inquiry in Political Science.”’ Politics and the Life Sciences 1:17–18. (1)Google Scholar
Caldwell, Lynton K. (1982). “Will Biology Change Politics? A Commentary.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:44–45. (5)Google Scholar
Cook, Beverly Blair (1982). “The Personality and Procreative Behavior of Trial Judges: A Biocultural Perspective.” International Political Science Review 3:51–70. (3)Google Scholar
Corning, Peter A. (1982a). “Empirical Evidence for a Cybernetic Theory of Politics.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (2)Google Scholar
Corning, Peter A. (1982b). “Political Development versus Political Evolution.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, New Haven. (2)Google Scholar
Davies, James C. (1982). “Some Consequences of Environmental Determinism in the Social Sciences.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Washington, D.C. (3)Google Scholar
Denisov, Vladimir (1982). “Correlation between the Social and Biological in Interpretation of the Problems of War and Peace.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Political Science Association, Rio de Janeiro. (1)Google Scholar
Emmert, Mark (1982). “A Biobehavioral Approach to Small Group Research.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (4)Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven, and Norpoth, Helmut (1982). “Ideological Recognition of Issues and Candidates in the 1980 Campaign.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Milwaukee. (4)Google Scholar
Flohr, Heiner (1982). “Biopolitics: Versuch jenseits des Kulturismus.” PVS-Literatur 23:196–203. (1)Google Scholar
Funke, Odelia (1982). “Can Biopolicy Ignore Social Policy?” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:46–47. (5)Google Scholar
Geiger, Gebbard (1982). “Primordial State Formation as an Evolutionary Process.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Political Science Association, Rio de Janeiro. (2)Google Scholar
Gianos, Phillip L. (1982). Political Behavior. Pacific Palisades, Calif.: Palisades Publishers, chapter 6. (1) (3)Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel M. Jr. (1982a). “Biology, Behavior, and Public Administration.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, New Haven. (5)Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel M. Jr. (1982b). “Biopolitics and the Evolution of Inquiry in Political Science.” Politics and the Life Sciences. 1:5–16. (1)Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel M. Jr. (1982c). “Ordering Political Space.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Diego. (3)Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel M. Jr. (1982d). “To Regulate or Not to Regulate: The Continuing Controversy over Genetic Research and Biotechnology.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (5)Google Scholar
Jones, Diane Carlson (1982). “Power Structures and Perceptions of Power Holders in Same-Sex Groups of Young Children.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Milwaukee. (2)Google Scholar
Kitchin, William (1982a). “Hemispheric Specialization and Political Communication.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (3) (4)Google Scholar
Kitchin, William (1982b). “The Split Brain and Political Behavior: A Preliminary Analysis of the Cognitive Systems of Ronald Reagan.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, New Haven. (3) (4)Google Scholar
Laponce, Jean A. (1982). “Linguistic Minority Rights in the Light of Neurophysical and Geographic Evidence.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Sociological Association, Mexico City. (3)Google Scholar
Levy, Jack (1982). “The Contagion of Great Power War Behavior, 1495-1975.” American Journal of Political Science 26:562–584. (6)Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Tursky, Bernard (1982). “The Socio-psychophysical Scaling of Political Opinion.” In Wegener, Bernd (ed.), Social Attitudes and Psychophysical Measurement. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (4)Google Scholar
Longino, Helen (1982). “Feminism, Biology, and the Search for Objectivity.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (1)Google Scholar
Losco, Joseph (1982a). 'Biopolitics: On Evolution in the Inquiry into Political Science. Politics and the Life Sciences. 1:18–19. (1)Google Scholar
Losco, Joseph (1982b). “Evolution, Consciousness, and Political Thought.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (3)Google Scholar
Losco, Joseph (1982c). “Teleonomic Selection, Rational Preselection and Politics: Towards an Evolutionary Perspective.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, New Haven. (2)Google Scholar
Losco, Joseph, and Baird, Donna Day (1982). “The Impact of Sociobiology on Political Science.” American Behavioral Scientist 25:335–360. (1) (2)Google Scholar
Madsen, Douglas (1982). “The Effect of Psychological Stress on Influence Distributions.” International Political Science Review 3:91–106. (3)Google Scholar
Manheim, Jarol B. (1982). The Politics Within. 2nd ed.New York: Longman, chapter 9. (3)Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1982a). “The Duties of Humanity: Legal and Moral Obligation in Rosseau's Thought.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, New Haven. (2)Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1982b). “Evolutionary Biology, Political Theory and the State.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5:433–450. (2)Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1982c). “Is Sociobiology Reactionary? The Political Implication of Inclusive-Fitness Theory.” Quarterly Review of Biology 57:275–292. (2)Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1982d). “Nice Guys Don't Finish Last: Aggressive and Appeasement Gestures in Media Images of Politicians.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C. (2)Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1982e). “Toward a Natural Science of Human Culture.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:19–20. (2)Google Scholar
Petchesky, Rosalind (1982). “Reproductive Rights under the Reagan Administration.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (5)Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. (1982a). “The Human Brain and Hypostatizing.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Washington, D.C. (3)Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. (1982b). “Neurophysiology and Rationality in Political Thinking.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (3)Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A., and Lawson, Robert (1982a). “Cognitive Psychology and Predicting Political Attitudes and Behavior.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Milwaukee. (3)Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A., and Lawson, Robert (1982b). “Cognitive Psychology and the Study of Politics.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (3) (4)Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A., and Somit, Albert (1982). “Cognitive Development and Childhood Political Socialization.” American Behavioral Scientist 25:313–334. (3)Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A., Lawson, Robert, and Slagter, Robert (1982). “Biopolitics: 1980-1981 update.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:52–57. (1)Google Scholar
Ronen, Dov (1982). “The Functioning and Dysfunctioning of Political Institutions and the Human Organism.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (2)Google Scholar
Ryan, Barbara (1982). “How ‘Significant State Interests’ Affect the Minor's Right to Abortion.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (5)Google Scholar
Saetz, Stephen B. (1982). “Biology, Suicide, and Public Policy.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, New Haven. (5)Google Scholar
Schonscheck, Jonathan, and Barron Boyd, J. Jr. (1982). “Natural Selection and Nation-States.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Studies Association, Cincinnati. (2)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982a). “Epigenesis: The Newer Synthesis?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:24–25. (2)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982b). “Ethological Politics.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C. (2)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982c). “The Evolution of Inquiry in Biopolitics.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:20–21. (1)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982d). “The Evolution of Political Science.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (1) (3)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982e). “Infanticide by Usurper Hanuman Langur Males: A Sociobiological Myth.” Social Science Information 20:199–244. (2)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982f). “Nonverbal Communication as Political Behavior.” In Key, Mary Ritchie (ed.)., Nonverbal Communication Today. The Hague: Mouton. (4)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982g). “Political Ethology.” Micropolitics 2:51–86. (2)Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982h). “Some Implications of Brain Science for Political Science.” Occasional Papers in Political Science, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Political Science. 1:165–200.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon, and Somit, Albert, eds., (1982). “The Biology of Primate Sociopolitical Behavior.” DeKalb, Illinois: Program for Biosocial Research, Northern Illinois University. (1) (2)Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. (1982a). “Biopolicy and Biopolitics.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:47–48. (5)Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. (1982b). “An Ethological Approach to Analyzing the Interaction Process in Small Group Legislative Decision-Making.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (2) (4)Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. (1982c). “Food for Peace? The Political Impact of U.S. PL 480 Food Aid.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Studies Association, Cincinnati. (5)Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. (1982d). “Political Impacts of Life Extending Technologies.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (5)Google Scholar
Schubert, James N. (1982e). “Toward a Psychobiological Model of Malnutrition and Political Violence.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Political Science Association, Rio de Janeiro. (3)Google Scholar
Shavory, Thomas C. (1982). “Policy Analysis, Kidney Substitution, and the ‘Logic of Cure’: Probing the Limits of Utilitarianism.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver. (5)Google Scholar
Slavin, Sarah (1982). “Biopolitics and Contemporary Feminist Thought.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Milwaukee. (1)Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, Joseph, and Foley, Mary Ann (1982). “The Words of Things Entangle and Confuse: The Ambiguous Political Concept.” International Political Science Review 3:107–130. (4)Google Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu (1982a). “Human Striving for Democracy Through Civilization.” International Society for the Comparative Study of Civilization, Pittsburgh. (2)Google Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu (1982b). “Katsaus Biopoliittiseen Tutkimukssen.” Politiikka 1982:72–79. (1)Google Scholar
Wahlke, John C. (1982). “Comment: Politics and the Evolution of Inquiry in Political Science.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:22–23. (1)Google Scholar
Watts, Meredith W. (1982). “Biopolitics and Sex Differences.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Diego. (2) (3)Google Scholar
Wheeler, Harvey (1982). “The Invention of Wisdom: From the Discovery of Audial Psychophysics to Plato's Politics.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5:223–232. (3)Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1982a). “Brain Science and the Emergence of Neuropolitics.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:23–25. (3)Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1982b). “Clouds, Clocks, Brains, and Political Learning.” Micropolitics 2:279–309. (3)Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1982c). “Self Direction and Political Action: Conscious Purpose, Emic Analysis, and Ongoing Political Biography.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, New Haven. (3)Google Scholar
Wiegele, Thomas C. (1982a). “The Biotechnology of Sex Preselection.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Political Science Association, Rio de Janeiro. (5)Google Scholar
Wiegele, Thomas C., ed. (1982b). Biology and the Social Sciences. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Addenda

Cross, David V., Tursky, Bernard, and Lodge, Milton (1975). “The Role of Regression and Range Effects in Determination of the Power Function for Electric Shock.” Perception and Psychophysics 18:9–14. (4)Google Scholar
Falger, V. S. E. (1981a). “Biopoliticologie.” In de Waal, Frans B. M. (ed.), Sociobiologie ter Discussie. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema, and Halkema. (2)Google Scholar
Falger, V. S. E. (1981b). “Geweld: een Natuurverschijnsel?” In De Vree, Johan K. (ed.), Oorlog en Vrede. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samson. (2)Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton (1981). Magnitude Scaling. Sage University Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-001. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications. (4)Google Scholar
Orr, David W. (1979). “In the Tracks of the Dinosaur: Modernization and the Ecological Perspective.” Polity 11:562–587. (6)Google Scholar
Ross, Marc Howard (1981). “When does Ethnic Antagonism Displace Class Conflict? A Sociobiological Hypothesis in Urban Africa.” Comparative Urban Research 8:5–28. (2)Google Scholar
Shinn, A. M. Jr. (1974). “Relations between Scales.” In Blalock, H. M. (ed.), Measurement in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Aldine. (4)Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, Joseph, and Foley, Mary Ann (1981). “Separating Objects of Specific and Diffuse Support: Experiments on Presidents and the Presidency.” Micropolitics 1:345–367. (4)Google Scholar
Tursky, Bernard, Lodge, Milton, and Reeder, Richard (1979). “Psychophysical and Psychophysiological Evaluation of the Direction, Intensity, and Meaning of Race-Related Stimuli.” Psychophysiology 16:452–462. (4)Google Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu (1978). “Sosiobiologinen Nakokulma Politologisen Tutkimukssen.” Politiikka 1978:146–156. (1) (2)Google Scholar
Wheeler, Harvey (1978). “Human Sociobiology: An Exploratory Essay.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 1:307–318. (1) (2)Google Scholar