Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T14:35:55.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminism, the Naturalistic Fallacy, and Evolutionary Biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Barbara Smuts
Barbara Smuts*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, USA
Get access

Extract

Arnhart argues that a scientific understanding of women's nature, achieved through primatology and related disciplines, can serve as a basis for judging social arrangements. Those arrangements that promote the expression of women's “natural potentials” should be encouraged. Based on this argument, the key issues are (1) how to determine the “natural” potential of women, and (2) how to use this information to judge social arrangements. I will begin by focusing on the second and more fundamental issue; I will return later to the first.

Type
Roundtable Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , August 1992 , pp. 174 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R.S.(1987). The Biology of Moral Systems. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Daly, M.and Wilson, M.(1988). Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dickemann, M.(1981). “Paternal Confidence and Dowry Competition: A Biocultural Analysis of Purdah.” In Alexander, R.D.and Tinkle, D.W.(eds.), Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory. New York: Chiron Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D.(1989). Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, C.A.(1987). Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, C.A.(1989). Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smuts, B.B.(1985). Sex and Friendship in Baboons. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smuts, B.B.(1992). “Male Aggression against Women: An Evolutionary Perspective.” Human Nature 3:1–44.Google Scholar
Smuts, B.B.(forthcoming). “Origins of Gender Inequality: An Evolutionary Perspective.” In Zagarell, A.(ed.), Origins of Gender Inequality.Google Scholar
Smuts, B.B.and Smuts, R.W.(in press). “Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion in Nonhuman Primates and other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications.” In Slater, P.J.B., Rosenblatt, J.S., Milinski, M., and Snowdon, C.T.(eds.), Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol. 22. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R.and Thornhill, N.W.(1983). “Human Rape: An Evolutionary Analysis.” Ethology and Sociobiology 7:137–173.Google Scholar
de Waal, F.B.M.(1982). Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar