Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T10:25:38.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contemporary Ethical Analyses: A Shortfall in Scientific Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Matthew Bacchetta
Affiliation:
Cornell University Medical College, USA
Gerd Richter
Affiliation:
University of Marburg, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Roundtable Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacchetta, M.D. and Richter, G. (1996). “Dimensions and Classification of Genetic Interventions in the Human Genome.” A Response to “Germ-line Therapy to Cure Mitochondrial Disease: Protocol and Ethics of In Vitro Ovum Nuclear Transplantation” by Rubenstein, D. S. et al. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5:450–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, F.G., Fins, J.J., and Bacchetta, M.D. (1996). “Clinical Pragmatism: John Dewey and Clinical Ethics.” The Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 13:2751.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, D.S., Thomasma, D.DC., Schon, E.A., and Zinaman, M.J. (1995). “Germ-Line Therapy to Cure Mitochondrial Disease: Protocol and Ethics of Invitro Ovum Nuclear Transplantation.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4:316–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar