Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:31:16.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biological Warfare and Disarmament Problems, Perspectives, and Possible Solutions: Complementary Measures Inside and Outside the Framework of the BWC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Hassan Mashhadi*
Affiliation:
Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Biological Warfare
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buzan, B. (1991). People, States and Fear. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Kober, S. (1990). “Idealpolitik.” Foreign Policy. 79: 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, R. (1993). “A Comparison of the Australia Group's List of Chemical Weapons Precursors and the CWC Schedules of Chemicals.” Chemical Weapons Convention Bulletin. September.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. (1992). Statement to the Conference on Disarmament on Behalf of the Australia Group, 7 August. UN Document No. CD/1164.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. (1993). Statement to the Conference on Disarmament, 10 August. UN Document No. CD/PV.659.Google Scholar
Smith, J. (1995). “Trade, the Australia Group, and the Chemical Weapons Convention.” Conference on Effective National Implementation of the CWC, September 8–10.Google Scholar
Smithson, A. (1995). Separating Fact from Fiction: The Australia Group and the Chemical Weapons Convention. Henry L. Stimson Center, Occasional Paper No. 34. March.Google Scholar
Smithson, A. (1998). “Man Versus Microbe: The Negotiations to Strengthen the Biological Weapons Convention.” In Chevrier, M. et al., (eds.) Biological Weapons Proliferation: Reasons for Concern, Course of Action. Henry L. Stimson Center, Report No. 24. January.Google Scholar
United States (1995). Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. “The Australia Group.” Fact Sheet distributed by Office of Public Affairs. February 10.Google Scholar
Zanders, J.P. and French, E. (1999). “Article XI of the Chemical Weapons Convention: Between Irrelevance and Indispensability.” Contemporary Security Policy 20(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar