Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T09:33:58.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biological and Toxin Weapons: Arms Control, Stability, and Western Security

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Lynn M. Hansen
Lynn M. Hansen*
Affiliation:
HQUSAFA/DFPS, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, CO 80840-5701
Get access

Abstract

Arms control is not about agreements, but rather deals with creating enhanced security and international stability. Such objectives are difficult to realize in the field of biological and toxin weapons. The 1972 convention which bans them contains neither enforcement nor verification mechanisms. Rapid advancements in the fields of biochemistry and genetic engineering provide enormous potential for developing novel toxin weapons that defy virtually all conventional verfication methodologies. Moreover, it is widely assumed that the 1972 agreement has been violated by the Soviet Union and its client states in various parts of the world. This undermines the agreement's credibility as an effective international tool to prevent the exploitation of science and technology for ever more egregious weapons. Despite the troubled past and uncertain future of arms control in this area, every moral government must attempt to make arms control a viable element in the fight against the proliferation and use of biological and toxin weapons.

Type
Articles and Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 9 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Biotechnology and International Conflict , August 1990 , pp. 47 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ASM News (1988). “Biological Weapons Research.” 54: 342–343.Google Scholar
Chemical Weapons Convention Bulletin. (1989). “From the Flight of the Iraqi Kurds to the Declaration of Paris.” (February): 4–12.Google Scholar
Barzani, M. (1988). “Prevention of Genocide Act of 1988.” Congressional Record (September 9): S 12133.Google Scholar
Crovitz, G. (1984). “Yellow Rain: H'Mong, Afghans, Now Iranians.” Wall Street Journal (March 13): 6.Google Scholar
Defense Intelligence Agency. Soviet Biological Warfare Threat. DST-1610F. Washington, DC 1986.Google Scholar
Donnelly, C.N. (1981). “Winning the NBC War: Soviet Army Theory and Practice.” International Defense Review No. 8 (August): 989–990.Google Scholar
Economist. (1988). “Still No End to Their Suffering.” (October 22): 50.Google Scholar
Freier, S. (1989). “Non-Proliferation and the Non-Proliferation Treaty.” Paper presented at the 55th Pugwash Symposium, May 5-7, 1989, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Friedman, T. (1989). From Beirut to Jerusalem. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.Google Scholar
Gaffney, F.J. Jr. (1988). “The Poor Man's Atomic Bomb.” Baltimore Sun (April 1):Google Scholar
Gertz, B. (1986) “Moscow Perfecting ‘Genetic’ Weapons, Secret Study Warns.” Washington Times (February 18):Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (1989a). “Iraqis Announce Test of a Rocket.” New York Times (December 8):Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (1989b). “U.S. Confirms Iraq has Launched Rocket that can Carry Satellites.” New York Times International (December 9): A14.Google Scholar
Green, C.G. (1989). Remarks made at the First Annual Mosher Defense Conference, Houston Texas, February 1-3, 1989. Sponsored by Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Green, C.G. (1990). European Arms Control Prospects for 1990, A Conference held at Houston, Texas, January 5, 1990. Sponsored by the Mosher Institute of Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Hansen, L.M. (1988). Testimony before the U.S. Congress, House, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Committee on Armed Services, and Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Biological Warfare Defensive Measures: Research Programs and Policy Issues: Hearing, May 3, 1988. 100th Congress, 1st Session. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 17–24.Google Scholar
Hansen, L.M. (1989). “In Pursuit of a Ban on Chemical Weapons.” In Hatchett, R. (ed.), European Arms Control: Problems and Prospects. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 143–154.Google Scholar
Hatchett, R., ed. (1989). European Arms Control: Problems and Prospects. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Kamal, A. (1989). “The Chemical Weapons Convention: Some Particular Concerns of Developing Countries.” Chemical Weapons Convention Bulletin (May): 1.Google Scholar
Kucewicz, W. (1984). “Mycotoxins: The Scientific Battlefield.” Wall Street Journal (May 30): 20.Google Scholar
Kucewicz, W. (1984). “The Science of Snake Venom.” Wall Street Journal (April 25): 30.Google Scholar
Lami, L. (1982). “Cambodia, They Are Really Using Poisonous Gases.” Il Giornale Nuovo (March 19):Google Scholar
Nixon, R.M. President (1969). Statement on Chemical and Biological Weapons. (November 25).Google Scholar
Ottaway, D.B.“U.S. Gave Iraq Bacteria, Sen. McCain Charges.” Washington Post (January 2):Google Scholar
Owens, Senator W.M. (1989). Testimony before the U.S. Congress, Senate, Governmental Affairs Committee. Biological Weapons Proliferation and the New Genetics: Hearing, May 17, 1989. 101st Congress, 1st Session. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Seiders, B. (1986). “Canadian‘Yellow Rain’ Research: Does It Weaken the Case?” Science 234 (October 31):528.Google Scholar
Sidel, V.W. (1989). Testimony before the U. S. Congress, Senate, Committee on Governmental Affairs. Biological Weapons Proliferation and the New Genetics: Hearing, May 17, 1989. 101st Congress, 1st SessionWashington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Spiers, E.M. (1986). Chemical Weapons. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Thatcher, G. (1988). “Special Report: Poison on the Wind.” Christian Science Monitor (December 13-16): [56 p.]Google Scholar
Thompson, L. (1989). “The Perils of Biological Warfare.” Washington Post Health (January 24):Google Scholar
Washington Times (1989) “Rabin Alarmed over Iraqi Missile.” Washington Times (December 21):Google Scholar
Webster, W.H. (1989d). Testimony before the U.S. Congress, Senate, Foreign Relation Committee. Chemical and Biological Weapons Threat: The Urgent Need for Remedies: Hearings, March 1, 1989. 101st Congress, 1st Session. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 29–45.Google Scholar