Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:23:58.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Author's Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Samuel M. Hines
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles and Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 1982 , pp. 25 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W., et al. (1976). The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Alexander, Richard D. (1976). Darwinism and Human Affairs. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. (1976). “Learning How to Do Analysis in Political and Social Sciences.” Unpublished mauscript.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1981). The Nature of Mind. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barash, David (1977). Sociobiology and Behavior. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Barner-Barry, Carol (1981). “Logitudinal Observational Research and the Study of Basic Forms of Political Socialization.” In Watts, Meredith (ed.), Biopolitics: Ethological and Physiological Approaches. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass, pp. 51–60.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian (1978). Sociologists, Economists, and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian and Rae, Douglas (1975). “Political Evaluation.“ In Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson (eds.), Political Science: Scope and Theory. Handbook of Political Science, vol. 1. Reading, Mass,: Addison–Wesley, pp. 337–401.Google Scholar
Beck, Henry (1975). “Ethological Considerations on the Problem of Political Order.” Political Anthropology 1:109–135.Google Scholar
Beck, Henry (1976). “Neuropsychological Servosystems, Consciousness and the Problem of Embodiment.” Behavioral Science 21:139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, N.J.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Leonard (1978). “Whatever Happened to the Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis?” American Behavioral Scientist 21:691–708.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. (1976). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
von Bertalanffy, Ludwig (1967). Robots, Men, and Minds. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
von Bertalanffy, Ludwig (1968). General Systems Theory. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Blank, Robert H. (1981). The Political Implications of Human Genetic Technology. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bluhm, William T. (1969). “Metaphysics, Ethics, and Political Science.” Review of Politics 31:66–87.Google Scholar
Bluhm, William T. (1978). Theories of the Political System. 3rd ed.Engelwood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bluhm, William T. (1979). “Rational and Cultural Man.” In Falco, Maria (ed.), Through the Looking Glass: Epistemology and the Conduct of Political Inquiry. Washington, D. C.: University Press of America, pp. 188–213.Google Scholar
Bluhm, William T., ed. (1982). The Paradigm Problem in Political Science: Perspectives from Philosophy and from Practice. Durham, N. C.: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blurton Jones, N. G. (1981). “Human Ethology—-the Study of People as if They Could Not Talk?” Ethology and Sociobiology 2:51–53.Google Scholar
Blurton Jones, N. G., and Reynolds, V., eds. (1978). Human Behavior and Adaptation. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Blute, Marion (1979). “Sociocultural Evolutionism: An Untried Theory.” Behavioral Science 24:46–59.Google Scholar
Boehm, C. (1978). “Rational Preselection from Hamadryas to Homo Sapiens: The Place of Decisions in Adaptive Process.” American Anthropologist 80:265–296.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth (1981). “Human Knowledge as a Special System.” Behavioral Science 26:93–102.Google Scholar
Braybrooke, David (1979). “Through Epistemology to the Depths of Illusion.” In Falco, Maria (ed.), Through the Looking Glass. Washington, D. C.: University Press of America, pp. 59–82.Google Scholar
Buckley, Walter, ed. (1968). Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Lynton K. (1964). “Biopolitics: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy.” Yale Review 54:1–16.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Lynton K. (1981). “Survivalist Policies: Ecological–Environmental Factors.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. (1966). “Evolutionary Epistemology.” In Schillp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl R. Popper. LaSalle, III. Open Court Publishers, Book I, pp. 413–463.Google Scholar
Capra, Fritjof (1978). “The New Physics as a Model for a New Medicine.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 1:71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, T. F. (1972). Content Analysis: A Technique for Systematic Inference from Communications. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, William R. (1982). “The Ontogeny of Political Behavior.” American Behavioral Scientist: 25:273–294.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. (1981). “Evolutionary Epistemology and Human Values.” Current Anthropology 22:201–218.Google Scholar
Comfort, Alex (1980). “Demonic and Historical Models in Biology.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 3:207–215.Google Scholar
Connerton, Paul (1980). The Tragedy of Enlightenment: An Essay on the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. (1973). “Theoretical Self-Consciousness.” Polity 6:5–35.Google Scholar
Corning, Peter (1971). “The Biological Bases of Behavior and Some Implications for Political Science.” World Politics 23:312–370.Google Scholar
Corning, Peter (1973a). “Politics and the Evolutionary Process.” In Dobzhansky, Theodosius et al. (eds.), Evolutionary Biology. New York: Appleton–Century Crofts, vol. 7, pp. 253–295.Google Scholar
Corning, Peter (1973b). “Social Biology Training for Political Scientists.” Memorandum, to Eulau, Heinz, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Corning, Peter (1978). “Biopolitics: Toward a New Political Science.” Paper presented at the meeting of The American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
Corning, Peter (1981a). “A Cybernetic Theory of Politics.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Denver.Google Scholar
Corning, Peter (1981b). “Synopsis of a General Theory of Politics.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
Corning, Peter(forthcoming). The New Synergism Hypothesis: A Theory of Progressive Evolution. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
von Cranach, Mario, ed. (1976). Methods of Inference from Animal to Human Behavior. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Crane, Diana (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crook, John H. (1980). The Evolution of Human Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred (1976). “Beyond Dogma and Despair: Toward a Critical Theory of Politics.” American Political Science Review 70:64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred (1978). “Human Nature: Prospects of a Humanistic Naturalism.” Paper presented at the Conference for the Study of Political Thought, Chicago.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred (1981). Twilight of Subjectivity: Contributions to a Post–Individualist Theory of Politics. Amherst: University of Massachussetts Press.Google Scholar
Danielli, James F. (1980). “Altruism and the Internal Reward System of the Opium of the People.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 3:87–94.Google Scholar
Danielli, James F. et al. (1982). “Constructional Biology.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5:12–14.Google Scholar
Davidson, Julian, and Davidson, Richard, eds. (1980). The Psychobiology of Human Consciousness. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
DeGreene, Kenyon (1981). “Limits to Societal Systems Adaptability.” Behavioral Science 26:103–113.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl (1963). The Nerves of Government. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Roger M. and Meyer, James T. (1978). “Geography and the Mind.” American Behavioral Scientist 22:59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. (1977). “Practicing History and Social Science on ‘Realist’ Assumptions.” In Hookway, C. and Petit, P. (eds.), Action Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Easton, David (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray (1971). Politics as Symbolic Action. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles and Cracroft, Joel (1980). Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process: Method and Theory in Comparative Biology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles and Gould, S. J. (1972). “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism.” In Schopf, T. J. M. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper, pp. 82–115.Google Scholar
Engel, George L. (1977). “The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine.” Science 196:129–136.Google Scholar
Engel, George L. (1982). “Either–Or: Eliminating Meaningless Controversy with the Biopsychosocial Model.” A talk presented at Psychiatry Grand Rounds, Strong Memorial Hospital, The University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz (1963). The Behavioral Persuasion in Politics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Ey, Henri (1978). Consciousness: A Phenomenological Study of Being Conscious and Becoming Conscious. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Eyles, John D., and Smith, David M. (1978). “Social Geography.” American Behavioral Scientist 22:41–58.Google Scholar
Farganis, James (1975). “A Preface to Critical Theory.” Theory and Society 2:483–508.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul (1970). “Consolation for the Specialist.” In Lakotos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–230.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Ross, ed. (1977). Human Needs and Politics. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Flathman, Richard, ed. (1973). Concepts in Social and Political Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane (1981). “Why Epistemology Matters.” Journal of Politics 43:1006–1028.Google Scholar
Flew, A. G. N. (1967). Evolutionary Ethics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Folse, Henry (1977). “Complementarity and the Description of Experience.” International Philosophical Quarterly 17:377–392.Google Scholar
Folse, Henry (1978). “Rationality and the Ideal of the Description of Nature.” Paper presented at the 16th World Congress of Philosophy, Dusseldorf, West Germany.Google Scholar
Frohock, Fred (1972). “Reasoning in Politics.” Journal of Politics 34:1028–1061.Google Scholar
Futuyama, Douglas J. (1979). Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Garson, , David, G. (1976). Political Science Methods. Boston: Holbrook PressGoogle Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael S., and Blakemore, Colin, eds. (1975). Handbook of Psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goldman, Stanford (1980). “A Unified Theory of Biology and Physics.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 3:331–360.Google Scholar
Gould, Steven J. (1977). Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Steven J. (1980). “Is a New General Theory of Evolution Emerging?” Paleobiology 6:119–130.Google Scholar
Gould, Steven J., and Eldredge, Niles (1977). “Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered.” Paleobiology 3:23–40.Google Scholar
Graham, George (1972). “Reason and Change in Political Order.” In Graham, George and Carey, George (eds.), The Post-Behavioral Era: Perspectives on Political Science. New York: David McKay, pp. 107–123.Google Scholar
Graham, George (1975). “Thought on Ludwig Wittgenstein and Political Analysis.” Political Science Reviewer 5:247–269.Google Scholar
Graham, George, and Havard, William C. (1980). “The Language of the Statesman: Philosophy and Rhetoric in Contemporary Politics.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Greene, John C. (1981). Science, Ideology, and World View: Essays in the History of Evolutionary Ideas. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Grene, M. (1974). The Understanding of Nature. Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John (1969). “The Idea of the Conceptual Framework: A Philosophical Critique.” Journal of Comparative Administration 1:140–176.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John (1975). Philosophy, Science, and Political Inquiry. Morristown, N. J.: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John (1981). “Political Theory and the Theory of Action.” Western Political Quarterly 34:341–358.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1970). Toward a Rational Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1973). Theory and Practice. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1979). Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Edward T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Handler, Philip (1970). Biology and the Future of Man. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanna, Thomas (1970). Bodies in Revolt: A Primer of Somatic Thinking. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
Hebb, Donald O. (1980). “The View from Without.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 10:309–315.Google Scholar
Hilgard, E. (1980). “Consciousness in Contemporary Psychology.” Annual Review of Psychology 3:1–26.Google Scholar
Hill, Melvyn Alan (1972). “Jurgen Habermas: A Social Science of the Mind.” Philosophy of Social Science 2:247–259.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel (1975a). “Evolutionary Epistemology and Political Knowledge.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel (1975b). “Political Action as Play.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel (1976). Political Development and Personal Knowledge. Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel (1978). “Accommodating Biological Facts: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives in Biopolitical Inquiry.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel (1979a). “The Biobehavioral Paradigm in Political Science.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Newark, N. J.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel (1979b). “Evolutionary Epistemology and Political Knowledge.” In Falco, Maria (ed.), Through the Looking Glass. Washington, D. C.: University Press of America, pp. 329–365.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel (1979c). “Sociobiology, Culture and Biobehavioralism in Political Science.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel (1979d). “The Political and Social Implications of the Recombinant DNA Controversy: A Question of Basic Science Research Policy.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Gatlinburg, Tenn.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel (1981). “The Origins of the State.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel (1982a). “Is Synthesis Philosophically Possible? The Paradigm Problem in the Philosophy of Social Science.” In Bluhm, William T. (ed.), Political Science and Philosophy of Science. Durham, N. C.: Carolina Academic Press, pp. 25–63.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel (1982b). “Ordering Political Space: An Appraisal of the Work of Jean LaPonce.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Diego, Calif.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, Mass.: Addison–Wesley.Google Scholar
Hummel, Ralph P. (1971). “Teaching Political Theory: The Impact of Biopolitics.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer (1981). The Woman That Never Evolved. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ingber, Lester (1981). “Towards a Unified Brain Theory.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 4:201–210.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank (1980). “Interactionism Revived?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 10:316–323.Google Scholar
Jantsch, Erich and Waddington, Conrad H., eds. (1976). Evolution and Consciousness: Human Systems in Transition. Reading, Mass.: Addison–Wesley.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin (1973). The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Jung, Hwa Yul (1979). The Crisis of Political Understanding: A Phenomenological Perspective in the Conduct of Political Inquiry. Pittsburg: Duquense University Press.Google Scholar
Kieffer, George H. (1979). Bioethics. Reading, Mass.: Addison–Wesley.Google Scholar
Kimble, Daniel P. (1977). Psychology as a Biological Science. 2nd ed.Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore (1970). “Ideology Critique and Phenomenology: The Current Debate in German Philosophy.” Philosophy Today 14:151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberg, Allan, ed. (1981). Conduct of Political Inquiry. Political Science Reading Lists and Course Outlines, vol. 2. Durham, N. C.: Eno River Press.Google Scholar
Kort, Fred, and Maxson, Stephen C. (1979). “Politics in a Biobehavioral Perspective: A Report on a Course Based on a New Paradigm.” In Jefferey, C. R. (ed.), Biology and Crime. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, pp. 122–138.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B. (1981). An Introduction to Behavioral Ecology. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Kress, Paul (1979). “Against Epistemology.” Journal of Politics 41:526–542.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Alfred (1980). “Differences vs. Similarities in Living Systems.” Behavioral Science 25:40–45.Google Scholar
Laponce, Jean (1981). Left and Right: The Topography of Political Perceptions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold (1956). “The Political Science of Science.” American Political Science Review 50:961–979.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold (1968). “The Future of the Comparative Method.” Comparative Politics 1:3–18.Google Scholar
Laszlo, Ervin (1972). Introduction to Systems Philosophy: Toward a New Paradigm of Contemporary Thought. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Leiserson, Avery (1972). “Realism and Commitment in Political Theory.” In Graham, George and Carey, George (eds.), The Post–Behavioral Era: Perspectives on Political Science. New York: David McKay, pp. 144–170.Google Scholar
Leiss, William (1974). The Domination of Nature. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Leiss, William (1975). “The Problem of Man and Nature in the Work of the Frankfurt School.” Philosophy of Social Sciences 5:163–172.Google Scholar
Leiss, William (1976). The Limits to Satisfaction: An Essay on the Problems of Needs and Commodities. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1970). “The Units of Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1:1–18.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Konrad (1977). Behind the Mirror: A Search for a Natural History of Human Knowledge. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Losco, J. (1981). “Ultimate vs. Proximate Explanation: Explanatory Modes in Sociobiology and the Social Sciences.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 4:329–346.Google Scholar
Losco, J. and Baird, D. (1982). “The Impact of Sociobiology on Political Science.” American Behavioral Scientist 25:335–360.Google Scholar
Lumsden, Charles J., and Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, Mind, and Culture. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven (1977). “The Critical Theory Trip.” Political Studies 25:408–412.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas (1978). The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambrige, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, Michael T. (forthcoming, , 1982) “Biopolitics: Possible Research Paradigms.” International Political Science Review.Google Scholar
McShea, Robert (1978a). “Biology and Ethics.” Ethics 88:139–149.Google Scholar
McShea, Robert (1978b). “Human Nature Theory and Political Philosophy.” American Journal of Political Science 22:656–679.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, W. J. M. (1978). Biological Ideas in Politics. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Marney, Milton and Schmidt, Paul (1976). “Evolution of Scientific Method.” In Jantsch, Erich and Waddington, Conrad H. (eds.), Evolution and Consciousness. Reading, Mass.: Addison–Wesley, pp. 185–197.Google Scholar
Maruyama, Magoroh (1976). “Toward Cultural Symbiosis.” In Jantsch, Erich and Waddington, C. H. (eds.), Evolution and Consciousness. Reading, Mass.: Addison–Wesley, pp. 198–213.Google Scholar
Marler, Peter and Vandenberg, J. G., eds. (1979). Social Behavior and Communication. Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, vol. 3. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Mason, William (1979). “Ontogeny of Social Behavior.” In Marler, Peter and Vandenbergh, J. G. (eds.), Social Behavior and Communication. Handbook of Neurobiology, vol. 3. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1970). “Genes, Language, and Evolution.” Semiotica 2:295–320.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1973a). “Functional Approaches to Analogical Comparison Between Species.” Social Science Information 15:855–878.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1973b). “On Comparing Humans—-and Human Politics—-with Animal Behavior.” Paper presented at the World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1975a). “Functional Approaches to Analogical Comparison Between Species.” Social Science Information 12:7–28.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1975b). “Politics as a Biological Phenomenon.” Social Science Information 14:7–63.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1976). “The Impact of Ethology on Political Science.” In Somit, Albert (ed.), Biology and Politics. Paris: Mouton, pp. 197–233.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1977). “Human Nature, Nature, and Political Thought.” In Roland Pennock, J. and Chapman, John W. (eds.), Human Nature and Politics. NOMOS 17. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1978a). “Attention Structures and Political Campaigns.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1978b). “Classical Political Philosophy and Contemporary Biology.” Paper presented at the Conference for the Study of Political Thought, Chicago.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1978c). “Jean Jacques is Alive and Well: Rousseau and Contemporary Sociobiology.” Daedalus 107:93–105.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1979a). “Beyond Reductionism: Five Basic Concepts in Human Ethology.” New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 265–284.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1979b). “Linking Ethology and Political Science: Non–reductionist Methods in Biopolitics.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, Boston.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1981a). “Linking Ethology and Political Science: Photographs, Political Attention, and Presidential Electronics.” In Watts, Meredith (ed.), Biopolitics: Ethological and Physiological Approaches. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, number 7. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, pp. 61–80.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1981b). “Social Biology and the Welfare State.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger (1982). “Nice Guys Don't Finish Last: Aggressive and Appeasement Gestures in Media Images of Politicians.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger(in press). “Is Sociobiology Reactionary? The Political Implications of Inclusive Fitness Theory.” Quarterly Revew of Biology.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger(n.d.). “Evolutionary Biology, Political Theory, and the Origins of The State.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Matson, Floyd (1964). The Broken Image: Man, Science, and Society. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Meehan, Eugene (1967). Contemporary Political Thought. Homewood, III.: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1969). “The Behavior of Scientists.” American Scientist 57:1–23.Google Scholar
deMontesquieu, Baron (1900). The Spirit of the Laws. Vol. 1. Translated by Nugent, Thomas. Revised byPritchard, J. V.New York: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar
Moon, , Donald, J. (1975). “The Logic of Political Inquiry: A Synthesis of Opposed Perspectives.” In Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson (eds.), Political Science: Scope and Theory. Handbook of Political Science, vol. 1. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, pp. 121–228.Google Scholar
Munevar, Gonzalo (1981). Radical Knowledge: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature and Limits of Science. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Natanson, Maurice, ed. (1973). Phenomenology and the Social Sciences. 2 vols. Evanston, III.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Ophuls, William (1977). Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Felix (1975). “The Language of Political Inquiry.” In Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson (eds.), Political Science: Scope and Theory. Handbook of Political Science, vol. 1. Reading, Mass.: Addison–Wesley, pp. 283–336.Google Scholar
Orr, David W. (1979). “In the Tracks of the Dinosaur: Modernization and the Ecological Perspective.” Polity 11:562–587.Google Scholar
Pangle, Thomas L. (1973). Montesquieu's Philosophy of Liberalism: A Commentary on The Spirit of the Laws Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A.(n.d.). “The Human Brain and Hypostatizing.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. (1979a). “The Biopolitics of Political Behavior: Past and Future.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, Boston.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. (1979b). “Sociobiology and Reification.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. (1981). “Sociobiology and Ideas–Become–Real: Case Study and Assessment.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 4:125–144.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven A. (1982). “Consciousness Theory and the Biology of Political Rationality.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven and Somit, Albert (1978). “Methodological Problems Associated with a More Biologically Oriented Social Science.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 1:11–25.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven, Somit, Albert, and Slagter, Robert (1981). “Biopolitics: 1980–1981 Update.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
Pettmen, Ralph (1981). Biopolitics and International Values. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Claude (1981). “The Origin of the State: Fortuitous or Evolutionary?” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean (1970). Genetic Epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean (1971). Biology and Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean (1978). Behavior and Evolution. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Pirages, Dennis (1978). Global Ecopolitics: A New Context for International Relations. North Scituates, Mass.: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Plotkin, H. C. and Odling–Smee, F. J. (1982). “A Multiple Level Model of Evolution and Its Implications for Sociobiology.” Behavioral Brain Sciences 4:225–268.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael (1964). Personal Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1972). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl and Eccles, John (1977). The Self and its Brain. New York: Springer–Verlag.Google Scholar
Porter, Philip W. (1978). “Geography as Human Ecology.” American Behavioral Scientist 22:15–40.Google Scholar
Potes, Marvin H. (1979). “The Functional Analogy as a Concealed Metaphor: A Critical Examination of The Use of Biological Analogy in Biopolitics.” Ph.D. dissertation, Kent State University.Google Scholar
Potter, van Renaselaer (1971). Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice–Hall.Google Scholar
Pribram, Karl (1979). “Behaviourism, Phenomenology, and Holism in Psychology: A Scientific Analysis.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 2:65–72.Google Scholar
Pribram, Karl (1980). “Unpacking Some Dualities Inherent in a Mind/Brain Dualism.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 10:295–308.Google Scholar
Pribram, Karl (1982). “Comments.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5:64–66.Google Scholar
Pulliam, , Ronald, H. and Dunford, Christopher (1980). Programmed to Learn: An Essay on the Evolution of Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rappoport, Anatol (1980). “Philosophical Perspectives on Living Systems.” Behavioral Science 35:56–64.Google Scholar
Reed, Edward S. (1982). “Comment: The Need for a Biology of Transformation and Invariance.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5:56–58.Google Scholar
Reid, Herbert (1972). “Contemporary Political Science in the Crisis of Industrial Society.” Midwest Journal of Political Sciences 16:339–366.Google Scholar
Reid, Herbert (1973). “American Social Science in the Politics of Time and the Crisis of Techno–Corporate Society: Toward a Critical Phenomenology.” Politics and Society 3:201–244.Google Scholar
Reid, Herbert, and Yanarella, Ernest (1975). “Political Science and the Post–Modern Critique of Scientism and Domination.” Review of Politics 37:286–316.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1977). Methodological Pragmatism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Vernon (1976). The Biology of Human Action. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Roberts, D.F. (1978). Climate and Human Variability. 2nd ed.Menlo Park, Calif.: Cummings Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Roberts, Morley (1938). Bio–Politics: An Essay in the Physiology and Pathology and Politics of the Social and Somatic Organism. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Rodman, John (1980). “Paradigm Change in Political Science: An Ecological Perspective.” American Behavioral Scientist 24:49–78.Google Scholar
Roederer, Juan (1978). “On the Relationship between Human Brain Functions and the Foundations of Physics, Science, and Technology.” Foundations of Physics 8:423–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald (1978). “Rationalist Theories of Politics.” World Politics 33:296–323.Google Scholar
Rotenstreich, Nathan (1982). “Comments.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5:59–64.Google Scholar
Sack, Robert D. (1980). Conceptions of Space in Social Thought: A Geographic Perspective. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Schaefer, Karl E., Hensel, Herbert, and Brady, Ronald, eds. (1977). Toward a Man–Centered Medical Science. New York: Futura Publishing.Google Scholar
Schroyer, Trent (1973). The Critique of Domination: The Origins and Development of Critical Theory. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1976). “Politics as a Life Science: How and Why the Impact of Modern Biology Will Revolutionize the Study of Political Behavior.” In Somit, Albert (ed.), Biology and Politics. Paris: Mouton, pp. 155–195.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1977). “Prospectus for a Training Program in Biopolitics.” Paper presented at a planning conference of the Research Committee on Biology and Politics, International Political Science Association, Bellagio, Italy.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1979a). “Ethology: A Primer for Political Scientists.” Notes 2 (January 1979). DeKalb, III.: Center for Biopolitical Research.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1979b). “Ethology: A Primer for Political Scientists.” Notes 2 (April 1979). DeKalb, III.: Center for Biopolitical Research.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1979c). “Classical Ethology: Concepts and Implications for Human Ethology.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2:44–66.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1980). Review of Handbook of Ethological Methods by Philip Fehner. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 3:83–85.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1981a). “Brain Science and Political Thinking.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, University of Mannheim, Federal Republic of Germany.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1981b). “Some Implications of Brain Science for Political Science.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Denver.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1981c). “Some Implications of Evolutionary Biology for Political Science.” Occasional Papers in Political Science 1:49–81. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1981d). “The Use of Ethological Methods in Political Analysis.” In Watts, Meredith (ed.), Biopolitics: Ethological and Physiological Approaches. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, number 7. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982a). “Ethological Politics.” Paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., January 1982.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982b). “Infanticide by Usurper Hanuman Langur Males: A Sociobiological Myth.” Social Science Information 20:199–244.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982c). “Nonverbal Communication as Political Behavior.” In Key, M. R. and Preziosis, D. (eds.), Non–Verbal Communication Today: Current Research. Paris: Mouton, pp. 69–85.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982d). “Political Ethology.” Micropolitics, 2:51–86.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982e). “The Evolution of Political Science.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982f). “Some Implications of Brain Science for Political Science.” Occasional Papers in Political Science, 1:165–200. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon(in press). “The Structure of Attention: A Critical Review.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon, and Somit, Albert, eds. (1982). The Biology of Primate Sociopolitical Behavior. DeKalb, III.: Center for Biopolitical Research.Google Scholar
Schubert, James (1981a). “The Impact of Food Aid on World Malnutrition.” International Organization 35:329–354.Google Scholar
Schubert, James (1981b). “Malnutrition and Political Violence.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Denver.Google Scholar
Schubert, James (1981c). “Modernization, Trade Dependence, and Health Status in Latin America.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Studies Association, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, III.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Ruth A. (1979). “Sociobiology: The Science of Patriarchy.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Scott, J. P. (1982). “Biology and Political Behavior: A Systems Analysis.” American Behavioral Scientist 25:243–272.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael J. (1981). Language and Political Understanding: The Politics of Discursive Practices. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter (1981). The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter (1982) “Ethics and Sociobiology.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 11:40–64.Google Scholar
Smith, , Maynard, J. (1982). “Comments.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5:49–51.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert (1972). “Biopolitics.” British Journal of Political Science 2:209–238.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert (1981). “Human Nature as the Central Issue in Political Philosophy.” In White, Elliott (ed.), Sociobiology and Human Politics. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, pp. 167–180.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, ed. (1976). Biology and Politics. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert and Tanenhaus, Joseph (1967). The Development of American Political Science. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, Peterson, Steven A., Richardson, William D., and Goldfischer, David S. (1980). The Literature of Biopolitics. Rev. ed.DeKalb, III.: Center for Biopolitical Research.Google Scholar
Spencer, Joseph E. (1978). “The Growth of Cultural Geography.” American Behavioral Scientist 22:79–92.Google Scholar
Spicker, Stuart, ed. (1970). The Philosophy of the Body: Rejections of Cartesian Dualism. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
Sprout, Harold, and Sprout, Margaret (1978). The Context of Environmental Politics. Lexington, Ky.: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Sprout, Harold, and Sprout, Margaret (1979). “National Priorities and the Physical Habitat.” World Politics 31:600–615.Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, W. J. (1980). Approaches to Democracy. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Stanley, Steven M. (1981). The New Evolutionary Timetable. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stebbins, , Ledyard, G., and Ayala, Francisco (1971). “Is a New Evolutionary Synthesis Necessary?” Science 213:967–971.Google Scholar
Stent, Gunther (1969). The Coming of the Golden Age: A View of the End of Progress. Garden City, N.Y.: The Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Stent, Gunther (1978). Paradoxes of Progress. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Stent, Gunther (1981). “Cerebral Hermeneutics.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 4:107–124.Google Scholar
Stent, Gunther, ed. (1979). Morality as a Biological Phenomenon. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, Jerone (1970). “Some Questions about a More Biologically Oriented Political Science.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 14:687–707.Google Scholar
Stuart, Henry W. (1939). “Dewey's Ethical Theory.” In Schillp, Paul A. (ed.), The Philosophy of John Dewey. Evanston, III.: Northwestern University Press, 291–234.Google Scholar
Suppe, Frederick, ed. (1977). The Structure of Scientific Theories. 2nd ed.Urbana, III.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Susser, Bernard (1974). “The Behavioral Ideology.” Political Studies 22:271–288.Google Scholar
Sutherland, John W. (1973). A General System Philosophy for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Thorson, Thomas (1970). Biopolitics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Tiger, Lionel (1979a). “Biological Aspects of a Belief in Progress.” Paper presented to the World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Moscow, USSR.Google Scholar
Tiger, Lionel (1979b). Optimism: The Biology of Hope. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1971). Human Understanding. Vol. 1. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1977). “From Form to Function: Philosophy and History of Science in the 1950's and Now.” Daedalus 106:143–162.Google Scholar
Tursky, Bernard, Lodge, Milton, and Cross, David (1976). “A Bio-Behavioral” Framework for the Analysis of Political Behavior.” In Somit, Albert, ed., Biology and Politics. Paris: Mouton, pp. 59–96.Google Scholar
Uttal, William R. (1978). The Psychobiology of Mind. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Vehrencamp, Sandra (1979). “The Roles of Individual Kin and Group Selection in the Evolution of Sociality.” In Marler, Peter and Vandenbergh, J. G. (eds.), Social Behavior and Communication. Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, vol. 3. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 351–394.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1961). The Ethical Animal. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Wahlke, John (1979). “Pre-Behavioralism in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 73:9–32.Google Scholar
Ward, James (1977). “Biobehavioral Political Theory: A Philosophical Criticism.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Mt. Pocono, Penna.Google Scholar
Washburn, S. L. (1978). “Human Behavior and the Behavior of Other Animals.” American Psychologist 33:405–418.Google Scholar
Watts, Meredith, ed. (1981). Biopolitics: Ethological and Physiological Approaches. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, number 7. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Webster, G., and Goodwin, B. C. (1982). “The Origin of Species: A Structuralist Approach.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5:15–47.Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1972). “Genetic Diversity and Political Life.” Journal of Politics 34:1203–42.Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1979). “Sociobiology, Neurobiology, and Political Socialization.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1980a). “The End of the ‘Empty Organism’: Human Neurobiology, Classical Social Science, and Political Learning.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1980b). “Clouds, Clocks, Brains, and Political Learning.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Boston.Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1981a). “The Neurobiological Basis of Human Action: The Restoration of Politics as the Master Art.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Denver.Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1981b). “Political Socialization from the Perspective of Generational and Evolutionary Change.” In White, Elliott (ed.), Sociobiology and Human Politics. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, pp. 259–281.Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1981c). “Sociobiology, Neurobiology, and Political Socialization.” Micropolitics 1:113–144.Google Scholar
White, Elliott, ed. (1981). Sociobiology and Human Politics. Lexington: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Whyte, Lancelot Law (1965). Internal Factors in Evolution. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Wiegele, Thomas C. (1978). “Toward a Human Science of Politics: The Real Post–Behavioral Revolution.” Paper presented at the Conference for the Study of Political Thought, Chicago.Google Scholar
Wiegele, Thomas C. (1979). Biopolitics: Search for a More Human Political Science. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wiegele, Thomas C. (1982). “Psycholinguistic Markers in the Speeches of U. S. Presidents During International Crisis.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Wiegele, Thomas C., ed. (1982). Biology and the Social Sciences: An Emerging Revolution. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Willhoite, Fred (1971). “Ethology and the Tradition of Political Thought.” Journal of Politics 33:615–641.Google Scholar
Willhoite, Fred (1980). “Reciprocity, Political Origins, and Legitimacy.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1978). On Human Nature. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winterhalder, Bruce (1980). “Environmental Analysis of Human Evolution and Adaptation Research.” Human Ecology 8:135–170.Google Scholar
Wood, Ellen Meiksins (1972). Mind and Politics. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, Edward (1972). “Re–Visioning the Future of the Third World: An Ecological Perspective on Development.” World Politics 25:1–33.Google Scholar
Zukav, Gary (1979). The Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview of the New Physics. New York: William Morrow and Company.Google Scholar