Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:42:41.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Europe and its Fertility: From Low to Lowest Low

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Francesco C. Billari
Francesco C. Billari*
Affiliation:
Institute of Quantitative Methods, Università Bocconi and IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research)
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper documents the fundamental changes in family formation that took place in Europe during the last two decades of the twentieth century, as well as some possible explanations for these changes. First, European youth have postponed key demographic events, and the latest-late pattern of transition to adulthood emerged in the South. Second, lowest-low fertility emerged during the 1990s in the same area, spreading quickly to Central and Eastern Europe. Policies and economic trends, long-standing cultural factors and ideational change interact in shaping change and differences. Macro-level factors in turn interact with micro-level ones to shape outcomes. The new demographic regime of Europe is thus likely to persist.

Keywords

Europetransition to adulthoodlatest-latefertilitylowest-lowJ13J11
Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 194 , October 2005 , pp. 56 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This is an amended and updated version of the paper ‘Partnership, childbearing and parenting: trends of the 1990s’ (Billari, 2005). The author would like warm thanks to go to Tomas Frejka for personal communications and for having provided the text and data from the Frejka and Sardon (2004) book before its publication; to Chiara de Florio la Rocca for help and assistance; to Eva Bernhardt and Gianpiero Dalla Zuanna for comments; and to Marion Burkimsher for extremely valuable professional editing advice. Of course responsibility for the content of the paper rests solely with the author.

References

Aassve, A., Billari, F.C., Mazzuco, S. and Ongaro, F. (2002), ‘Leaving home: a comparative analysis of ECHP data’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12, 4, pp. 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aassve, A., Billari, F.C. and Spéder, Z. (2003), Family formation during the Hungarian societal transition: trends in postponement and the impact of policy changes, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Ahn, N. and Mira, P. (2001), ‘Job bust, baby bust? Evidence from Spain’, Journal of Population Economics, 14, 3, pp. 505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, N. and Mira, P. (2002), ‘A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries’, Journal of Population Economics, 15, pp. 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, G. (1997), ‘The impact of children on divorce risks of Swedish women’, European Journal of Population, 13, pp. 109–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baizán, P., Aassve, A. and Billari, F.C. (2004), ‘The interrelations between cohabitation, marriage and first birth in Germany and Sweden’, Population and Environment, 26, 6, pp. 531–561.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S. (1981), A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bernardi, F. (2000), ‘Globalization, recommodification and social inequality: changing patterns of early careers in Italy’, Globalife Working Paper Series, No. 07, Faculty of Sociology, University of Bielefeld.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, E.M. (1993), ‘Fertility and employment’, European Sociological Review, 9, 1, pp. 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billari, F.C. (2004a), ‘Synthetic fertility measures and the search for commonalities in very low and lowest low fertility societies’ (comment on Caldwell and Schindlmayr, 2003), Population Studies, 58, 1.Google Scholar
Billari, F.C. (2004b), ‘Becoming an adult in Europe: a macro(/micro)-demographic perspective’, Demographic Research, SC3, 2.Google Scholar
Billari, F.C. (2005), ‘Partnership, childbearing and parenting: trends of the 1990s’, in UNECE/UNFPA (2005), pp. 63–94.Google Scholar
Billari, F.C. and Kohler, H.-P. (2002), ‘The impact of union formation dynamics on first births in West Germany and Italy: are there signs of convergence?’, in Klijzing and Corijn (2002), pp. 43–58.Google Scholar
Billari, F.C. and Kohler, H.-P. (2004), ‘Patterns of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe’, Population Studies, 58, 2, pp. 161–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billari, F.C. and Rosina, A. (2004), ‘Italian “latest-late” transition to adulthood: an exploration of its consequences on fertility’, Genus 60, 1.Google Scholar
Billari, F.C. and Wilson, C. (2001), ‘Convergence towards diversity? Cohort dynamics in the transition to adulthood in contemporary Western Europe’, WP 2001-039, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billari, F.C., Philipov, D. and Baizán, P. (2001), ‘Leaving home in Europe. The experience of cohorts born around 1960’, International Journal of Population Geography, 7, 5, pp. 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blossfeld, H.-P. (2000), ‘Globalization, social inequality and the role of country-specific institutions - open research questions in a learning society’, Globalife Working Paper Series, No. 11, Faculty of Sociology, University of Bielefeld.Google Scholar
Böheim, R. and Ermisch, J. (2001), ‘Partnership dissolution in the UK - the role of economic circumstances’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, pp. 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaarts, J. (2002), ‘The end of fertility transition in the developed world’, Population and Development Review, 28, 3, pp. 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaarts, J. and Watkins, S.C. (1996), ‘Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions’, Population and Development Review, 22, 4, pp. 639–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buber, I. and Fürnkranz-Prskawetz, A. (2000), ‘Fertility in second unions in Austria. Findings from the Austrian FFS’, Demographic Research, 3, 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchmann, M. (1989), The Script of Life in Modern Society. Entry into Adulthood in a Changing World, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.C. and Schindlmayr, T. (2003), ‘Explanations of the fertility crisis in modern societies: a search for commonalities’, Population Studies, 57, 3, pp. 241–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calot, G. (2001), ‘Mais qu'est-ce donc qu'un indicateur conjoncturel de fécondité?’, Population, 56, pp. 325–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, T.W. and Halpin, B. (2001), ‘Divorce in the UK’, University of Oxford, Department of Sociology Working Paper, 2001-01.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. (2002), ‘Populations of the industrial world - a convergent demographic community?’, International Journal of Population Geography, 8, 5, pp. 319–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (2005), Green Paper “Confronting demographic change: a new solidarity between the generations”, Brussels, Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2005), Recent Demographic Developments in Europe 2004, Strasbourg, Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
Dalla Zuanna, G. (2001), ‘The banquet of Aeolus: a familistic interpretation of Italy's lowest low fertility’, Demographic Research, 4, 5, pp. 131–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeny, P. (2003), ‘Population policy dilemmas in Europe at the dawn of the twenty-first century’, Population and Development Review, 28, 1, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Rose, A. and Racioppi, F. (2001), ‘Explaining voluntary low fertility in Europe: a multilevel approach’, Genus LVII, 1, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
Diekmann, A. and Engelhardt, H. (1999), ‘The social inheritance of divorce: effects of parent's family type in postwar Germany’, American Sociological Review, 64, pp. 783–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, H., Kögel, T. and Prskawetz, A. (2004), ‘Fertility and women's employment reconsidered: a macro-level time series analysis 1960-2000’, Population Studies, 58, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahey, T. and Spéder, Z. (2004), Fertility and Family Issues in an Enlarged Europe, Dublin, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
Frejka, T. and Sardon, J.-P. (2004), Childbearing Prospects in Low-Fertility Countries: A Cohort Analysis, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furstenberg, F.F. (2003), ‘Family: future’, in Demeny, P. and McNicoll, G. (eds), Encyclopedia of Population, New York, Macmillan Reference USA, pp. 348–350.Google Scholar
Fux, B. and Baumgartner, A.D. (2002), ‘Impact of population related policies on selected living arrangements: comparative analyses at the regional level in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland’, in Klijzing and Corijn (2002), pp. 193–227.Google Scholar
Gauthier, A.H. (2002), ‘Family policies in industrialized countries: is there convergence?’, Population, 57, 2, pp. 447–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, A.H. (2005), ‘Trends in policies for family-friendly societies’, in UNECE/UNFPA (2005), pp. 95–110.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1990), The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, K.F. and Tomassini, C. (2000), ‘Proximity to children: a comparison of Britain and Italy’, The Gerontologist, 40, 6, pp. 729–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, J., Lutz, W. and Testa, M.R. (2003), ‘The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe’, European Demographic Research Papers, 2, Vienna Institute of Demography, Vienna.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, J.D., Koo, H.P. and Suchindran, C.M. (1985), ‘Childbearing and family in remarriage’, Demography, 22, pp. 73–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafsson, S. (2001), ‘Optimal age at motherhood. Theoretical and empirical considerations on postponement of maternity in Europe’, Journal of Population Economics, 14, 2, pp. 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, J. (1965), ‘European marriage patterns in perspective’, in Glass, D.V. and Eversley, D.E.C. (eds), Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography, London, Edward Arnold, pp. 101–143.Google Scholar
Hakim, C. (2003), ‘A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: preference theory’, Population and Development Review, 29, 3, pp. 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdsworth, C. (2000), ‘Leaving home in Britain and Spain’, European Sociological Review, 16, pp. 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiernan, K. (1999), ‘Childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe’, Population Trends, 98, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
Klijzing, E. and Corijn, M. (eds) (2002), Fertility and Partnership in Europe: Findings and Lessons from Comparative Research. Volume II, New York/Geneva, United Nations.Google Scholar
Kögel, T. (2004), ‘Did the association between fertility and female employment in OECD countries really change its sign?’, Journal of Population Economics, 17, 1, pp. 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, H.-P. (2001), Fertility and Social Interactions: An Economic Perspective, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, H.-P. and Kohler, I. (2002), ‘Fertility decline in Russia in the early and mid 1990s: the role of economic uncertainty and labour market crises’, European Journal of Population, 18, 3, pp. 233–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, H.-P., Billari, F.C. and Ortega, J.A. (2002), ‘The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s’, Population and Development Review, 28, 4, pp. 641–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalovaara, M. (2001), ‘Socio-economic status and divorce in first marriages in Finland 1991-93’, Population Studies, 55, pp. 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G.W. (1993), ‘Is demographic uniformity inevitable?’, Journal of the Australian Population Association, 10, pp. 1–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Kuijsten, A. (1996), ‘Changing family patterns in Europe: a case of divergence?’, European Journal of Population, 12, 2, pp. 115–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lesthaeghe, R. (1998), ‘On theory development and applications to the study of family formation’, Population and Development Review 24, 1, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesthaeghe, R. and Van de Kaa, D. (1986), ‘Twee demografische transities?’ in Lesthaeghe, R. and Van de Kaa, D. (eds), Bevolking: Groei en Krimp, Deventer, Van Loghum Slaterus, pp. 9–24.Google Scholar
Lesthaeghe, R. and Willems, P. (1999), ‘Is low fertility a temporary phenomenon in the European Union?’, Population and Development Review, 25, 2, pp. 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macura, M. and Beets, G. (eds) (2002), Dynamics of Fertility and Partnership in Europe. Insights and Lessons from Comparative Research, Volume I, New York/Geneva, United Nations.Google Scholar
Macura, M. and MacDonald, A. (2003), ‘Fertility and fertility regulation in Eastern Europe: from the socialist to the post-socialist era’, in Kotowska, I.E. and Józwiak, J. (eds), Population of Central and Eastern Europe. Challenges and Opportunities, Warsaw, Statistical Publishing Establishment, pp. 35–90.Google Scholar
Mamolo, M. (2004), ‘Convergence of family formation and reproductive patterns across Europe. Methodological issues and empirical evidence’, Doctoral Dissertation in Demography, Rome, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Faculty of Statistical Sciences, Department of Demographic Sciences.Google Scholar
Mayer, K.U. (2001), ‘The paradox of global social change and national path dependencies: life course patterns in advanced societies’, in Woodward, A.E. and Kohli, M. (eds), Inclusions-Exclusions, London, Routledge, pp. 89–110.Google Scholar
Mayer, K.U. and Müller, W. (1986), ‘The state and the structure of the life course’ in Sorensen, A.B., Weinert, F.E. and Sherrod, L.R. (eds), Human Development and the Life Course: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp. 217–245.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. (2000), ‘Gender equity in theories of fertility transition’, Population and Development Review, 26, 3, pp. 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micheli, G.A. (2000), ‘Kinship, family and social network. The anthropological embedment of fertility change in Southern Europe’, Demographic Research, 3.Google Scholar
Monnier, A. and Rychtarikova, J. (1992), ‘The division of Europe into east and west’, Population: An English Selection 4, pp. 129–159.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M.R. and Casterline, J. (1996), ‘Social learning, social influence and new models of fertility’, Population and Development Review, 22, supplement, pp. 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neels, K. (2004), Reproductive Strategies in Belgian Fertility, 1930- 1990, Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Economic, Social and Political Sciences & Management School Solvay, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels.Google Scholar
Neyer, G.R. (2003), ‘Family policies and low fertility in Western Europe’, MPIDR WP-2003-021, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ní Bhrolchain, M. (1992), ‘Period paramount? A critique of the cohort approach to fertility’, Population and Development Review, 18, pp. 599–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipov, D. and Dorbritz, J. (2003), ‘Demographic consequences of economic transition in countries of central and eastern Europe’, Population Studies, 39, Strasbourg, Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
Pinnelli, A., De Rose, A., Di Giulio, P. and Rosina, A. (2002), ‘Interrelationships between partnership and fertility behaviour’, in Macura and Beets (2002), pp. 77–98.Google Scholar
Pfau-Effinger, B. (1999), ‘Change of family policies in the sociocultural context of European societies’, Comparative Social Research, 18, pp. 135–159.Google Scholar
Reher, D.S. (1998), ‘Family ties in Western Europe: persistent contrasts’, Population and Development Review, 24, pp. 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roussel, L. (1992), ‘La famille en Europe occidentale: divergence et convergence’, Population, 47, pp. 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, D.T. (1998), ‘Cross-national trends in childlessness’, Working Papers in Demography, 73, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Singh, S. and Darroch, J.E. (2000), ‘Adolescent pregnancy and childbearing: levels and trends in developed countries’, Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 1, pp. 14–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surkyn, J. and Lesthaeghe, R. (2002), ‘Value orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western, and Southern Europe: an update’, Interuniversity Papers in Demography, Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar
Thomson, E.et al. (2002), ‘Childbearing in stepfamilies: how parity matters?’, in Klijzing and Corijn (2002), pp. 87–99.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. (2001), ‘The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change’, Demography, 38, 4, pp. 449–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations (2002), Partnership and Reproductive Behaviour in Low-Fertility Countries, Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations Secretariat, New York.Google Scholar
UNECE (2000), ‘Fertility decline in the transition economies, 1989-1998: economic and social factors revisited’”, Economic Survey of Europe, 2000, pp. 189–207.Google Scholar
UNECE and UNFPA (2005), The New Demographic Regime. Population Challenges and Policy Responses, New York/Geneva, United Nations.Google Scholar
Van de Kaa, D.J. (1987), ‘Europe's second demographic transition’, Population Bulletin, 42, 1, Washington, DC, Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
Van de Kaa, D.J. (1997), ‘Options and sequences: Europe's demographic patterns’, Nethur Demography Paper 39.Google Scholar
Vikat, A., Hoem, J.M. and Thomson, E. (1999), ‘Stepfamily fertility in contemporary Sweden: the impact of childbearing before the current union’, Population Studies, 53, pp. 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, R. (1995), ‘Historical developments of the household in Europe’, in Van Imhoff, E., Kujisten, A., Hooimeijer, P. and Van Wissen, L. (eds), Household Demography and Household Modeling, New York and London, Plenum Press, pp. 19–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Y. and Willis, R.J. (1997), ‘Match quality, new information, and marital dissolution’, Journal of Labor Economics, 15, S293–S329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, C. (2001), ‘On the scale of global demographic convergence 1950-2000’, Population and Development Review, 27, 1, pp. 155–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed