Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:48:03.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Empire, Racial Capitalism and International Law: The Case of Manumitted Haiti and the Recognition Debt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2018

Abstract

Before 1492, European feudal practices racialized subjects in order to dispossess, enslave and colonize them. Enslavement of different peoples was a centuries old custom authorized by the law of nations and fundamental to the economies of empire. Manumission, though exceptional, helped to sustain slavery because it created an expectation of freedom, despite the fact that the freed received punitive consequences. In the sixteenth century, as European empires searched for cheaper and more abundant sources of labour with which to exploit their colonies, the Atlantic slave trade grew exponentially as slaves became equated with racialized subjects.

This article presents the case of Haiti as an example of continued imperial practices sustained by racial capitalism and the law of nations. In 1789, half a million slaves overthrew their French masters from the colony of Saint Domingue. After decades of defeating recolonization efforts and the loss of almost half their population and resources, Haitian leaders believed their declared independence of 1804 was insufficient, so in 1825 they reluctantly accepted recognition by France while being forced to pay an onerous indemnity debt. Though Haiti was manumitted through the promise of a debt payment, at the same time the new state was re-enslaved as France's commercial colony. The indemnity debt had consequences for Haiti well into the current century, as today Haiti is one of the poorest and most dependent nations in the world.

Type
INTERNATIONAL LEGAL THEORY: Symposium on ‘Imperial Locations’
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Professor of law, University of Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia [[email protected]].

References

1 A. Anghie, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (2005).

2 A. Pagden, The Burdens of Empire: 1539 to the Present (2015).

3 B. Bowden, The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea (2009); Obregón, L., ‘The Civilized and Uncivilized’, in Fassbender, B. and Peters, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of The History of International Law (2012)Google Scholar.

4 C. Robinson, Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition (1983).

5 Koskenniemi, M., ‘Empire and International Law: The Real Spanish Contribution’, (2011) 61 University of Toronto Law Journal 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 36.

6 M.-R. Trouillot called Haiti ‘the first testing ground of necocolonialism’, in Haiti, State against Nation: The Origins and Legacy of Duvalierism (1990), at 57. See also Haitian analyst L.J.R. Péan, Haiti, economie politique de la corruption de Saint-Domingue á Haiti 1791-1870 (2003) for a perspective on the internal governmentality based on the French culture of corruption and racism, institutionalized in independent but re-colonized Haiti.

7 Kamen, D., ‘Sale for the Purpose of Freedom: Slave Prostitutes and Manumission in Ancient Greece’, (2014) 109 The Classical Journal 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 P. Hunt, Ancient Greek and Roman Slavery (2017), at 121.

9 Kamen, supra note 7, at 284.

10 Ibid.

11 Hunt, supra note 8, at 128.

12 L. Rout. The African Experience in Spanish America, 1502 to the Present Day (1976).

13 R. Blackburn, The Making of New World Slavery From the Baroque to the Modern 1492-1800 (1998), at 103.

14 A. Pagden, The Fall of Natural Man: The American Indian and the Origins of Comparative Ethnology (1986).

15 D. Goldenberg The Curse of Ham: Race and Slavery in Early Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Jews, Christians and Muslims from the Ancient to the Modern World (2009).

16 Ibid.

17 Rout, supra note 12, at 24; L. Hanke, Aristotle and the American Indians A Study in Race Prejudice in the Modern World (1959), at 124.

18 A. Watson, Slave Law in the Americas (1989).

19 L. Sala-Moulins, Le Code Noir ou le calvaire de Canaan (1987).

20 The ceremony involved ‘pacing back and forth, drinking water from a stream, cutting down branches’ and making crosses and carving the names of the King and Queen ‘on rocks and on tree trunks’ in order to symbolize and legalize land appropriation. Phillips, W.D., ‘Transatlantic Encounters: Eyewitness Testimony and Spain's First American Possessions, 1492-1536’, (2007) 13 Medieval Encounters 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 154.

21 P. Seed, Ceremonies of Possession in Europe's Conquest of the New World, 1492-1640 (1995), Chapter 3: ‘The Requirement: A Protocol for Conquest’, at 69.

22 For different approaches to this debate see Anghie, A., ‘Francisco De Vitoria and the Colonial Origins of International Law’, in Smith, E.D. and Fitzpatrick, P. (eds.), Laws of the Postcolonial, Law, Meaning, and Violence (1999)Google Scholar; Benton, L. and Straumann, B., ‘Acquiring Empire by Law: From Roman Doctrine to Early Modern European Practice’, (2010) 28 Law and History Review 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Koskenniemi, supra note 5.

23 In 1550–1551, theologians Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda and Bartolomé de las Casas debated over whether the Aristotelian theory of natural slavery applied to the American Indians. De las Casas intended to save Indians from slavery by arguing their weakness, immaturity and inability to defend themselves but this allowed further Spanish dominion over the Indians, as their ‘protectors’. L. Hanke, All Mankind is One: A Study of the Disputation Between Bartolomé de Las Casas and Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda in 1550 on the Intellectual and Religious Capacity of the American Indians (1994). A Pagden, supra note 14, at 119–22.

24 D. Nicholls, From Dessalines to Duvalier: Race, Colour, and National Independence in Haiti (1996), at 50.

25 J. Barskett, Histoire politique et statistique de l’ïle d'Hayti Saint-Domingue: écrite sur des documens officiels et des notes communiquées (1826).

26 L. Sala Moulins, Le Code Noir ou le calvaire de Canaan (1987); Obregón, L., ‘Black Codes in Latin America’, in Appiah, K.A. and Gates, H.L. Jr. (eds.), Africana: Encyclopedia of the African and African American Experience (1999)Google Scholar.

27 M.W. Ghachem, The Old Regime and the Haitian Revolution (2012).

28 Nicholls, supra note 24, at 20.

29 F.L. Paxson, The Independence of the South-American Republics: A Study in Recognition and Foreign Policy (1903), at 18.

30 Paxson, F.L., ‘A Tripartite Intervention in Hayti, 1851’, University of Colorado Studies (February, 1904)Google Scholar.

31 C. Mackenzie, Notes on Haiti, Made During a Residence in That Republic (1830), at 80–1.

32 Stein, R., ‘From Saint Domingue to Haiti 1804-1825’, (1984) 19 Journal of Caribbean History 189Google Scholar, at 189–92.

33 R. Stein, Extrait des articles additionnels secrets du traité du 30 mai 1814 (1984).

34 The Club Massiac was founded in the Hotel Massiac in Paris on 20 August 1789 by colonists opposing the French Revolution and any participation of mulattoes (free coloured) in representation of the colonies.

35 B. de Vestey, The Colonial System Unveiled (translated by C. Bongie) (2016), at 43–6.

36 P.V. baron de Vastey, ‘Instructions for MM Dauxion Lavaysse, de Medina and Draverman’, in An Essay on the Causes of the Revolution and Civil Wars of Hayti, Being a Sequel to the Public Remarks Upon Certain Publications and Journals, concerning Hayti (1823), Appendix C no.1 pg XXXIX.

37 Ibid., at 140.

38 Nicholls, supra note 24, at 48.

39 J.F. Brière, Haïti et la France, 1804-1848 : Le Rêve Brisé (2008), at 65.

40 C. Mackenzie, Notes on Haiti: Made During a Residence in that Republic (1830), 84.

41 Ibid., at 83–4.

42 Ibid.

43 J.N. Léger, Haiti: Son Histoire et Ses Détracteurs (1907), Q171.

44 Mémoire sur Haïti, 9 février 1820, aux Archives du Ministère des Affaires Etrangères, at 149.

45 Léger, supra note 43.

46 As cited in D. Nicholls, ‘Haiti: Race, Slavery and Independence’, in L.J. Archer (ed.) Slavery and other Forms of Unfree Labor (1988/2003), 230 (Esmangart to Minister Pasquier, 2 January 1821).

47 Léger, supra note 43.

48 Nicholls, supra note 24, at 65.

49 J.P. Boyer, Pièces Officielles Relatives aux Négociations du Gouvernement Français avec le Gouvernement Haïtien, pour Traiter de la Formalité de la Reconnaissance de l'Indépendance d'Haïti (1824).

50 Ibid., at 7.

51 J. Wallez, Précis Historique des Négociations entre la France et Saint-Domingue; Suivi de Piéces Justificatives, et d'une Notice Biographique sur le Général Boyer; Président de la République d'Haïti (1826), at 53–6.

52 J. Franklin, The Present State of Hayti, with Remarks on Its Agriculture, Commerce, Laws, Religion, Finances, and Population (1928) and C. Malo, Histoire d'Hayti, depuis sa Découverte, jusqu'en 1824 (1825), (1829) North American Review, at 159–63.

53 Boyer, supra note 49.

54 Delagrange Mm. Dalloz, Hennequin, Dupin, Consultation de Mm. Dalloz, Delagrange, Hennequin, Dupin Jeune et Autres Jurisconsultes, pour les Anciens Colons de St-Domingue (1829), at 15.

55 Annual Register or a View of the, History, Politics and Literature of the Year 44 (1825).

56 The American Monitor: A Monthly Political Magazine Particularly Devoted to the Affairs of South America (1825), at 270.

57 Brière, supra note 39.

58 Ibid.

59 Mm. Dalloz, supra note 54.

60 A. Phillips, ‘Haiti, France and the Independence Debt of 1825’, 2008, available at canada-haiti.ca/sites/default/files/Haiti,%20France%20and%20the%20Independence%20Debt%20of%201825_0.pdf

61 F. Beauvois, ‘L'indemnité de Saint-Domingue’, (2009) 10 French Colonial History 109, at 199.

62 P.J. Hudson, Bankers and Empire: How Wall Street Colonized the Caribbean (2018), at 90–116.

63 C.L. Miller, ‘Forget Haiti: Baron Roger and the New Africa’, in D. Jensen (ed.), Yale French Studies Number 107, The Haiti Issue: 1804 and Nineteenth-Century French Studies (2005), 39–69, at 44.