Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 December 2014
This paper, written by Sue du Feu and James Lambert, outlines the challenges faced by the Jersey Legal Information Board (JLIB) in providing free access to legal information. The power of modern internet search engines has implications for a small island jurisdiction wishing to make its case law available on-line (see: www.jerseylaw.je). Having established protocols and policies to ensure a balance between open justice and privacy, several years later, JLIB is faced with concerns from individuals who feel that continuing public access to their earlier misdemeanours is an unfair burden. The paper will explain how the JLIB addressed the challenge of publishing court judgments online while safeguarding the interests of the individual.
1 Susskind, Richard. (2000) Transforming the Law. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar.
3 Spigelman, James. (2005) The Principle of Open Justice: A Comparative Perspective. Downloaded (27 August 2014) from: http://www.supremecourt.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/agdbasev7wr/supremecourt/documents/pdf/spigelman_speeches_2005.pdf.
4 Winn, Peter. (2004) Online Court Records: Balancing Judicial Accountability and Privacy in an Age of Electronic Information. Washington Law Review, vol. 79, 307–330Google Scholar.
5 Bowring, John (ed). (1843) The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 4, 316–317Google Scholar.
6 Lachance, Colin. (2014) Google, González and Globe24 h. Downloaded (27 August 2014) from: http://www.slaw.ca/2014/05/26/google-gonzalez-and-globe24h/.
7 Dobby, Christine. (2014) How cyber shame scams are playing on our privacy fears and scaling up. Downloaded (27 August 2014) from: http://business.financialpost.com/2014/03/29/how-cyber-shame-scams-are-playing-on-our-privacy-fears-and-scaling-up/?__lsa=8cfb-af2f.