Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:59:55.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dickens in Chol

Part of: Time Concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2022

Lydia Rodríguez
Lydia Rodríguez*
Affiliation:
The State University of New York at Potsdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines differences in gesture production in narrative contexts between American and Chol Mayan speakers at the narrative, metanarrative, and paranarrative levels of discourse, as well as differences in the production of linear temporal gestures. First, a comparison is made between the gestures produced by speakers of American English and Chol, a Western Maya language, as they tell the story of A Christmas Carol to an interviewer. The study shows a dire contrast between the American and Chol interpretation of this classic novel, and notable differences in the speech-accompanying gestures used by Americans and Chol Mayans respectively. American speakers’ temporal utterances are often accompanied by the well-documented lateral timeline gestures, where earlier events are located to the left of the gestural space, and later events are located to the right of the gestural space. By contrast, in Chol utterances no lateral, sagittal, or vertical timeline gestures accompany any form of temporal reference; the vast majority of gestures co-occur with metanarrative and paranarrative statements and have no explicit temporal content. The second part of the study analyzes the gestures made by a Chol speaker while telling a traditional story. A qualitative analysis of this traditional narrative shows that, when telling a story of the Chol tradition that is well known to the speaker, pragmatically-motivated gestures that occur at the metanarrative and paranarrative levels are much fewer than gestures occurring at the narrative level. In this traditional narrative, the gestures co-occurring with sequential, deictic temporal expressions and temporal metaphors did not reflect any kind of timeline that resembled those made by the American speakers in the Dickens in Chol task.

Keywords

TimecognitionnarrativegestureChol Mayan
Type
Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 303 - 331
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergen, B. & Chan Lau, T. T. (2012). Writing direction affects how people map space onto time. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 109. Published online April 10, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourdieu, P. (1963). The attitude of the Algerian peasant towards time. In Pitt-Rivers, J. (ed.), Mediterranean countrymen, 55–72. Paris: Recherches Mediterraneennes.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. & Jasmin, K. (2012). The hands of time: Temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics 23, 643–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, M., Meyer, A., Foulkes, L. & Kita, S. (2013). Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: The role of cognitive abilities and empathy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143, 694–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cienki, A. (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In Koenig, J. P. (ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap, 189–204. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. & Müller, C. (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Gesture Studies, 3. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In Moore, T. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, 27–63. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooperrider, K., Abner, N. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2018). The palm-up puzzle: Meanings and origins of a widespread form in gesture and sign. Frontiers in Communication. Published online June 26, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooperrider, K. & Núñez, R.. (2009). Across time, across the body: Temporal transversal gestures. Gesture 9, 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ø. (1995). When the future comes from behind: Malagasy and other time concepts and some consequences for communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 19, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, E. (2010). On trying and lying: Cultural configurations of the Gricean maxim of quality. Intercultural Pragmatics 7, 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, Ch. (1843). A Christmas Carol. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Everett, D. L. (n.d.). Underspecified temporal semantics in Pirahã and compositional transparency. In Jaszczolt, K. (ed.), Understanding human time. Oxford University Press (in press).Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2017). Pragmatic functions of gestures. Some observations on the history of their study and their nature. Gesture 16, 157–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., Danziger, E. & Stolz, C. (2001). Cultural specificity of spatial schemas, as manifested in spontaneous gestures. In Gattis, M. (ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Le Guen, O. & Pool Balam, L. (2012). No metaphorical timeline in gesture and cognition among Yucatec Mayas. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucy, J. A. (1993). Metapragmatic presentationals: Reporting speech with reportatives in Yucatec Maya. In Arthur, J. A. (ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics, 91–125. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D., Quek, F., Mccullough, K. E., Ansari, R., Duncan, S., Furuyama, N., Bryll, R., Ma, X. F. (2001). Catchments, prosody and discourse. Gesture 1, 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: A case of a gesture family?. In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures, 233–56. Berlin: Weidler.Google Scholar
Núñez, R.E. & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Cross linguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time. Cognitive Science 30, 401–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodríguez, L. (2019). “Time is not a line.” Temporal gestures in Chol Mayan. Journal of Pragmatics 151, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, L. & López, S. The crossroads of time. In Pitarch, P. Kelly, J.A. (eds.), The Culture of Invention in the Americas, 158–184. Canon Pyon: Sean Kingston Publishing.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, L. (2021). Los lenguajes del pensamiento. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana 16, 61–87.Google Scholar
Sinha, C., Da Silva Sinha, V., Zinken, V. J. & Sampaio, W. (2011). When time is not space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in an Amazonian culture. Language and Cognition 3, 137–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, K. & Bui, L. T. (2016). With the future coming up behind them: Evidence that time approaches from behind in Vietnamese. Cognitive Linguistics 27, 205–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar