Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:28:06.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-reported and neuropsychological measures of impulsivity in pathological gambling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2006

DANIEL FUENTES ,
HERMANO TAVARES ,
RINALDO ARTES  and
CLARICE GORENSTEIN
DANIEL FUENTES
Affiliation:
Psychology & Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Clinical Hospital, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
HERMANO TAVARES
Affiliation:
Gambling Outpatient Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Clinical Hospital, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
RINALDO ARTES
Affiliation:
Ibmec-São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
CLARICE GORENSTEIN
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pathological Gambling is an impulse control disorder. Impulsivity has been investigated separately by neuropsychological tests and self-report scales. Although some studies have tried to correlate these approaches, their interaction has not been sufficiently explored among pathological gamblers (PG). In this study, we have compared 214 PG (162 with comorbidity and 52 with no comorbidity) to 82 healthy volunteers regarding the reaction time and number of errors at Go/No-go tasks, and scores on the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS). PG have committed more errors at the Go/No-go tasks and presented higher scores on the self-report scale. The neuropsychological tests and BIS composed a multinomial logistic model that discriminated PG from non-gamblers better than models having one or another type of measure. Impulsivity seems to be a multi-dimensional phenomenon, and PG a heterogeneous population in which different types of impulsivity are present. (JINS, 2006, 12, 907–912.)

Keywords

Pathological gamblingImpulsivityAttentionPersonality inventoryExecutive functionsNeuropsychology
Type
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 12 , Issue 6 , November 2006 , pp. 907 - 912
Copyright
© 2006 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press
Barratt, E.S., Stanford, M.S., Kent, T.A., & Felthous, A. (1997). Neuropsychological and cognitive psychophysiological substrates of impulsive aggression. Biological Psychiatry, 41, 1045–1061.Google Scholar
Bracy, O.L. (1995). P S S CogReHab–Technical Manual. Psychological Software Services, Inc.
Castellani, B. & Rugle, L. (1995). A comparison of pathological gamblers to alcoholics and cocaine measures on impulsivity, sensation seeking, and craving. The International Journal of Addictions, 303, 275–289.Google Scholar
Cavedini, P., Riboldi, G., Keller, R., D'Annucci, A., & Bellodi, L. (2002). Frontal lobe dysfunction in pathological gambling patients. Biological Psychiatry, 15, 334–341.Google Scholar
Chambers, R.A, Taylor, J.R., & Potenza, M.N. (2003). Developmental neurocircuitary of motivation in adolescence: A critical period of addiction vulnerability. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1041–1052.Google Scholar
Cherek, D.R., Moeller, F.G., Dougherty, D.M., & Rhoades, H. (1997). Studies of violent and nonviolent male parolees: II. Laboratory and psychometric measurements of impulsivity. Biological Psychiatry, 41, 523–529.Google Scholar
Gualtieri, C.T. (1995). The contribution of the frontal lobes to a theory of psychopathology. In J.J. Ratey (Ed.), Neuropsychiatry of personality disorders. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Science Inc.
Hosmer, D.W., Jr. & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Lesieur, H. & Blume, S.B. (1987). The Soaks Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.Google Scholar
Navas Collado, E. & Munoz Garcia, J.J. (2004). Disexecutive syndrome in psychopathy. Revista de Neurologia, 38, 582–590.Google Scholar
Neter, J., Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J., & Wasseman, W. (1996). Applied Linear Statistical Models (4th ed.) McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Patton, J.H., Stanford, M.S., & Barratt, E.S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 769–774.Google Scholar
Petry, N.M. (2001). Substance abuse, pathological gambling, and impulsiveness. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 63, 29–38.Google Scholar
Rogers, R.D. & Robbins, T.W. (2001). Investigating the neurocognitive deficits associated with chronic drug abuse. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 250–257.Google Scholar
Rugle, L. & Melamed, L. (1993). Neuropsychological assessment of attention problems in pathological gamblers. Journal of Nervous Mental Disease, 181, 107–112.Google Scholar
Seidman, L.J., Biederman, J., Weber, W., Hatch, M., & Faraone, S.V. (1998). Neuropsychological function in adults with Attention-Deficits Hyperactivity Disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 44, 260–268.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1981). WAIS-R manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
Wing, J.K., Babor, T., Brugha, T., Burke, J., Cooper, J., Giel, R., Jablensk, A., Regier, D., & Sartorius, N. (1990). SCAN—Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 589–593.Google Scholar
Zaparniuk, J. & Taylor, S. (1997). Impulsivity in children and adolescents. In C.D. Webster & M.A. Jackson (Eds.), Impulsivity: theory, assessment, and treatment. New York: The Guilford Press.