Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:47:24.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prospective Memory Is a Key Predictor of Functional Independence in Older Adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2018

Alexandra Hering ,
Matthias Kliegel ,
Peter G. Rendell ,
Fergus I.M. Craik  and
Nathan S. Rose
Alexandra Hering*
Affiliation:
Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
Matthias Kliegel
Affiliation:
Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland Center for the Interdisciplinary Study of Gerontology and Vulnerability, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland Swiss National Center of Competences in Research LIVES–Overcoming vulnerability: life course perspectives, Lausanne and Geneva, Switzerland
Peter G. Rendell
Affiliation:
Cognition and Emotion Research Centre, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
Fergus I.M. Craik
Affiliation:
Rotman Research Institute of Baycrest, Toronto, Canada
Nathan S. Rose
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Alexandra Hering, Faculté de Psychologie et Sciences de l’Education, Université de Genève, 28, Boulevard du Pont d’Arve, Geneva, CH-1205. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: Prospective memory (PM), the ability to execute delayed intentions, has received increasing attention in neuropsychology and gerontology. Most of this research is motivated by the claim that PM is critical for maintaining functional independence; yet, there is a dearth of empirical evidence to back up the claims. Thus, the present study tested whether PM predicts functional independence in older adults using validated behavioral performance measures for both PM and functional independence. Methods: Fifty-eight healthy older adults performed a computerized PM paradigm, the Virtual Week task, as well as a timed version of an instrumental activities of daily living (TIADL) task. Furthermore, we assessed vocabulary, processing speed, and self-reported prospective remembering. Results: TIADL scores correlated significantly with performance in the Virtual Week task, vocabulary, and processing speed. Hierarchical linear regressions revealed that vocabulary and Virtual Week performance were significant predictors for TIADL. However, self-reported PM scores did not predict everyday functioning. Conclusions: The findings indicate that PM is an important cognitive ability for successful and independent everyday life beyond vocabulary. Moreover, the results show a substantial incremental contribution of intact PM performance for the prediction of everyday functioning by using objective PM measures. (JINS, 2018, 24, 640–645)

Keywords

Delayed intentionsMemory for intentionsInstrumental activities of daily livingAgingOld adulthoodEveryday functioning
Type
Brief Communication
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 24 , Issue 6 , July 2018 , pp. 640 - 645
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braver, T.S., & West, R. (2008). Working memory, executive control, and aging. In F.I.M. Craik & T.A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed., pp. 311–372). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, J.R., Smith, G., Maylor, E.A., Della Sala, S., & Logie, R.H. (2003). The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Memory, 11(3), 261–275. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crovitz, H.F., & Daniel, W.F. (1984). Measurements of everyday memory: Toward the prevention of forgetting. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22(5), 413–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crumley, J.J., Stetler, C.A., & Horhota, M. (2014). Examining the relationship between subjective and objective memory performance in older adults: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 29(2), 250–263. doi: 10.1037/a0035908 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jager, C.A., Budge, M.M., & Clarke, R. (2003). Utility of TICS-M for the assessment of cognitive function in older adults. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(4), 318–324. doi: 10.1002/Gps.830 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, E.R., Rose, N.S., McDaniel, M.A., & Rendell, P.G. (2013). Prospective memory in Parkinson disease during a Virtual Week: Effects of both prospective and retrospective demands. Neuropsychology, 27(2), 170–181. doi: 10.1037/a0031946 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, J.D., Phillips, L.H., Beatty, W.W., McDonald, S., Longley, W.A., Joscelyne, A., & Rendell, P.G. (2009). Evidence for deficits in facial affect recognition and theory of mind in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15(2), 277–285. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709090195 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kliegel, M., Ballhausen, N., Hering, A., Ihle, A., Schnitzspahn, K.M., & Zuber, S. (2016). Prospective memory in older adults: Where we are now and what is next. Gerontology. doi: 10.1159/000443698 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mioni, G., Rendell, P.G., Henry, J.D., Cantagallo, A., & Stablum, F. (2013). An investigation of prospective memory functions in people with traumatic brain injury using Virtual Week. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(6), 617–630. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2013.804036 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overdorp, E.J., Kessels, R.P.C., Claassen, J.A., & Oosterman, J.M. (2016). The combined effect of neuropsychological and neuropathological deficits on instrumental activities of daily living in older adults: A systematic review. Neuropsychology Review, 26(1), 92–106. doi: 10.1007/s11065-015-9312-y CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owsley, C., Sloane, M., McGwin, G., & Ball, K. (2002). Timed instrumental activities of daily living tasks: Relationship to cognitive function and everyday performance assessments in older adults. Gerontology, 48(4), 254–265. doi: 10.1159/000058360 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rendell, P.G., & Craik, F.I.M. (2000). Virtual Week and actual week: Age-related differences in prospective memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S43–S62. doi: 10.1002/Acp.770 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendell, P.G., & Henry, J.D. (2009). A review of Virtual Week for prospective memory assessment: Clinical implications. Brain Impairment, 10(1), 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N.S., Rendell, P.G., Hering, A., Kliegel, M., Bidelman, G., & Craik, F.I.M. (2015). Cognitive and neural plasticity in older adults’ prospective memory following training with the Virtual Week computer game. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(592), doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00592 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, N.S., Rendell, P.G., McDaniel, M.A., Aberle, I., & Kliegel, M. (2010). Age and individual differences in prospective memory during a “Virtual Week”: The roles of working memory, vigilance, task regularity, and cue focality. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 595–605. doi: 10.1037/A0019771 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelton, J.T., Lee, J.H., Scullin, M.K., Rose, N.S., Rendell, P.G., & McDaniel, M.A. (2016). Improving prospective memory in healthy older adults and individuals with very mild Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 64(6), 1307–1312. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14134 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, C.L., Henry, J.D., Rendell, P.G., Withall, A., & Brodaty, H. (2015). How valid are subjective ratings of prospective memory in mild cognitive impairment and early dementia? Gerontology, 61(3), 251–257. doi: 10.1159/000371347 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tierney, S.M., Bucks, R.S., Weinborn, M., Hodgson, E., & Woods, S.P. (2016). Retrieval cue and delay interval influence the relationship between prospective memory and activities of daily living in older adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 38(5), 572–584. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1141876 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Woods, S.P., Weinborn, M., Li, Y.Q.R., Hodgson, E., Ng, A.R.J., & Bucks, R.S. (2015). Does prospective memory influence quality of life in community-dwelling older adults? Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 22(6), 679–692. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1027651 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woods, S.P., Weinborn, M., Velnoweth, A., Rooney, A., & Bucks, R.S. (2012). Memory for intentions is uniquely associated with instrumental activities of daily living in healthy older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18(1), 134–138. doi: 10.1017/S1355617711001263 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zachary, R.A. (1986). Shipley Institute of Living Scale: Revised manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hering et al. supplementary material 1

Supplementary Table

Download Hering et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 13.8 KB