Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:29:04.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pretreatment Differences in Intraindividual Variability in Reaction Time between Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer and Healthy Controls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2016

Christie Yao Open the ORCID record for Christie Yao [Opens in a new window] ,
Jill B. Rich ,
Ian F. Tannock ,
Bostjan Seruga ,
Kattleya Tirona  and
Lori J. Bernstein
Christie Yao
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Jill B. Rich
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Ian F. Tannock
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Bostjan Seruga
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana and University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Kattleya Tirona
Affiliation:
Department of Supportive Care, Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Lori J. Bernstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Supportive Care, Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Lori Bernstein, 585 University Avenue, B PMB 146, Toronto General Hospital- ELLICSR, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: Chemotherapy has adverse effects on cognitive performance in women treated for breast cancer, but less is known about the period before chemotherapy. Studies have focused on mean level of performance, yet there is increasing recognition that variability in performance within an individual is also an important behavioral indicator of cognitive functioning and underlying neural integrity. Methods: We examined intraindividual variability (IIV) before chemotherapy and surgery in women diagnosed with breast cancer (n=31), and a healthy control group matched on age and education (n=25). IIV was calculated across trials of a computerized Stroop task, including an examination of the slowest and fastest trials of reaction time (RT) responses. Results: The groups were equivalent on overall accuracy and speed, and participants in both groups were less accurate and slower on incongruent trials compared with congruent trials. However, women with breast cancer became more variable with increased task difficulty relative to healthy controls. Among the slowest RT responses, women with breast cancer were significantly more variable than healthy controls on incongruent trials. This suggests that a specific variability-producing process (e.g., attentional lapses) occurs in task conditions that require executive control (e.g., incongruent trials). Conclusions: Results are consistent with other evidence of executive dysfunction among women treated for breast cancer. These findings highlight the importance of pretreatment assessment and show that variability in performance provides information about cognition that measures of central tendency do not. (JINS, 2016, 23, 1–10)

Keywords

Breast neoplasmsNeoadjuvant therapyCognitionAttentionExecutive functionFrontal lobes
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , May 2016 , pp. 530 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson-Hanley, C., Sherman, M.L., Riggs, R., Agocha, B., & Compas, B. (2003). Neuropsychological effects of treatments for adults with cancer: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 967–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, C.M., Sereika, S.M., Berga, S.L., Vogel, V.G., Brufsky, A.M., Paraska, K.K., & Ryan, C.M. (2006). Cognitive impairment associated with adjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 15(5), 422–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, L.J., Catton, P.A., & Tannock, I.F. (2014). Intra-individual variability in women with breast cancer. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(04), 380–390. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617714000125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunce, D., Warr, P.B., & Cochrane, T. (1993). Blocks in choice responding as a function of age and physical fitness. Psychology and Aging, 8, 26–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, C.L., Strauss, E., Hultsch, D.F., & Hunter, M.A. (2009). The relationship between everyday problem solving and inconsistency in reaction time in older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 16(5), 607–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, C.L., Strauss, E., Hultsch, D.F., Moll, A., & Hunter, M.A. (2006). Intraindividual variability as a marker of neurological dysfunction: A comparison of Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(1), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cimprich, B., Reuter-Lorenz, P., Nelson, J., Clark, P.M., Therrien, B., Normolle, D., & Welsh, R. C. (2010). Prechemotherapy alterations in brain function in women with breast cancer. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32(3), 324–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Frias, C.M., Dixon, R.A., & Camicioli, R. (2012). Neurocognitive speed and inconsistency in Parkinson’s disease with and without incipient dementia: An 18-month prospective cohort study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18(04), 764–772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, R.A., Garrett, D.D., Lentz, T.L., MacDonald, S.W.S., Strauss, E., & Hultsch, D.F. (2007). Neurocognitive markers of cognitive impairment: Exploring the roles of speed and inconsistency. Neuropsychology, 21(3), 381–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duchek, J.M., Balota, D.A., Tse, C.-S., Holtzman, D.M., Fagan, A.M., & Goate, A.M. (2009). The utility of intraindividual variability in selective attention tasks as an early marker for Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 23(6), 746–758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuentes, K., Hunter, M.A., Strauss, E., & Hultsch, D.F. (2001). Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance in persons with chronic fatigue syndrome. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15(2), 210–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heilman, K.M., & Watson, R.T. (2012). Neglect and related disorders. In K.M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (5th ed, pp. 296–348). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hermelink, K., Untch, M., Lux, M.P., Kreienberg, R., Beck, T., Bauerfeind, I., & Münzel, K. (2007). Cognitive function during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: Results of a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal study. Cancer, 109(9), 1905–1913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermelink, K., Voigt, V., Kaste, J., Neufeld, F., Wuerstlein, R., Buhner, M., & Harbeck, N. (2015). Elucidating pretreatment cognitive impairment in breast cancer patients: The impact of cancer-related post-traumatic stress. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 107(7), djv099–djv099. http://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultsch, D.F., MacDonald, S.W.S., & Dixon, R.A. (2002). Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology, 57B(2), 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultsch, D.F., MacDonald, S.W.S., Hunter, M.A., Levy-Bencheton, J., & Strauss, E. (2000). Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance in older adults: Comparison of adults with mild dementia, adults with arthritis, and healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 14(4), 588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultsch, D.F., Strauss, E., Hunter, M.A., & MacDonald, S.W.S. (2008). Intraindividual variability, cognition, and aging. In F.I.M. Craik & T.A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed, pp. 491–556). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Jansen, C.E., Cooper, B.A., Dodd, M.J., & Miaskowski, C.A. (2011). A prospective longitudinal study of chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes in breast cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 19(10), 1647–1656.Google Scholar
Jensen, A.R. (1992). The importance of intraindividual variation in reaction time. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(8), 869–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, S.W.S., Hultsch, D.F., & Dixon, R.A. (2008). Predicting impending death: Inconsistency in speed is a selective and early marker. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 595–607.Google Scholar
Mandelblatt, J.S., Stern, R.A., Luta, G., McGuckin, M., Clapp, J.D., Hurria, A., & Ahles, T. (2014). Cognitive impairment in older patients with breast cancer before systemic therapy: Is there an interaction between cancer and comorbidity? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(18), 1909–1918. http://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.2050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, B.C., Conroy, S.K., Ahles, T.A., West, J.D., & Saykin, A.J. (2012). Alterations in brain activation during working memory processing associated with breast cancer and treatment: A prospective functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(20), 2500–2508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, G.K. (1995). A multi-factor account of disability after brain injury: Implications for neuropsychological counselling. Brain Injury, 9, 453–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moorey, S., Greer, S., Watson, M., Gorman, C., Rowden, L., Tunmore, R., & Bliss, J. (1991). The factor structure and factor stability of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with cancer. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 158(2), 255–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murtha, S., Cismaru, R., Waechter, R., & Chertkow, H. (2002). Increased variability accompanies frontal lobe damage in dementia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8(3), 360–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesselroade, J.R. (1991). The warp and the woof of the developmental fabric. In R.M. Downs, L.S. Liben & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Visions of aesthetics, the environment & development: The legacy of Joachim F. Wohlwill (pp. 214–242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ono, M., Ogilvie, J.M., Wilson, J.S., Green, H.J., Chambers, S.K., Ownsworth, T., & Shum, D.H.K. (2015). A meta-analysis of cognitive impairment and decline associated with adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. Frontiers in Oncology, 5, 1–19. http://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00059/abstract.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quesnel, C., Savard, J., & Ivers, H. (2009). Cognitive impairments associated with breast cancer treatments: Results from a longitudinal study. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 116, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabbitt, P., Osman, P., Moore, B., & Stollery, B. (2001). There are stable individual differences in performance variability, both from moment to moment and from day to day. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 54(4), 981–1003.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T.A. (1993). Attentional blocks are not responsible for age-related slowing. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, 263–270.Google Scholar
Scherling, C., Collins, B., MacKenzie, J., Bielajew, C., & Smith, A. (2011). Pre-chemotherapy differences in visuospatial working memory in breast cancer patients compared to controls: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 1–21.Google Scholar
Scherling, C., Collins, B., MacKenzie, J., Bielajew, C., & Smith, A. (2012). Prechemotherapy differences in response inhibition in breast cancer patients compared to controls: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34(5), 543–560.Google Scholar
Strauss, E., Bielak, A.A.M., Bunce, D., Hunter, M.A., & Hultsch, D.F. (2007). Within-person variability in response speed as an indicator of cognitive impairment in older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14(6), 608–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, E., MacDonald, S., Hunter, M., Moll, A., & Hultsch, D.F. (2002). Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance in three groups of older adults: Cross-domain links to physical status and self-perceived affect and beliefs. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8(7), 893–906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuss, D.T., Murphy, K.J., Binns, M.A., & Alexander, M.P. (2003). Staying on the job: The frontal lobes control individual performance variability. Brain, 126(11), 2363–2380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, L.I., Sweet, J., Butt, Z., Lai, J.S., & Cella, D. (2009). Measuring patient self-reported cognitive function: Development of the functional assessment of cancer therapy–cognitive function instrument. The Journal of Supportive Oncology, 7(6), W32–W39.Google Scholar
Wefel, J.S., Saleeba, A.K., Buzdar, A.U., & Meyers, C.A. (2010). Acute and late onset cognitive dysfunction associated with chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. Cancer, 116(14), 3348–3356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, R., Murphy, K.J., Armilio, M.L., Craik, F.I.M., & Stuss, D.T. (2002). Lapses of intention and performance variability reveal age-related increases in fluctuations of executive control. Brain and Cognition, 49(3), 402–419.Google Scholar
Yellen, S.B., Cella, D.F., Webster, K., Blendowski, C., & Kaplan, E. (1997). Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 13(2), 63–74.Google Scholar
Zigmond, A.S., & Snaith, R.P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370.Google Scholar