Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:46:44.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examination of the Chicago Multiscale Depression Inventory and Initial Validation of a Positive Scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2015

Dede M. Ukueberuwa  and
Peter A. Arnett
Dede M. Ukueberuwa*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
Peter A. Arnett
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Dede M. Ukueberuwa, Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 372 Bruce V. Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Chicago Multiscale Depression Inventory (CMDI) was developed to improve accuracy in measuring depression symptoms in individuals with non-psychiatric medical illness. Earlier psychometric evaluation of the CMDI has emphasized properties of items that measure negative affect and experience. In this study, we provide an initial evaluation of an outcome scale of positive items that are also included within the CMDI but have previously been excluded from calculation of the total score. Psychometric data for the CMDI negative and positive item subscales were determined in healthy adults and patients with multiple sclerosis. Analysis included measurements of factor structure, reliability, and validity in comparison with other established measures of depression and affect. Study findings indicate that in healthy and patient samples, the CMDI Positive scale has very good reliability and validity. The Positive scale score also appears to predict depression symptoms beyond the negative item scale scores. The CMDI Positive scale could be a valuable clinical and research tool. Inclusion of the Positive scale in the CMDI total score appears to improve the measure by further capturing symptoms of affect and experience that are important to diagnosis of depression and are not covered by the negative scales alone. (JINS, 2016, 22, 76–82)

Keywords

EmotionAffective symptomsPsychometricsOutcome assessmentQuestionnairesValidation studies
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 76 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Steer, R.A., & Brown, G.K. (2000). BDI-Fast Screen for Medical Patients: Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Benedict, R.H., Fishman, I., McClellan, M.M., Bakshi, R., & Weinstock-Guttman, B. (2003). Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 9(4), 393–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, C.H., Nyenhuis, D.L., Cella, D., Luchetta, T., Dineen, K., & Reder, A.T. (2003). Psychometric evaluation of the Chicago Multiscale Depression Inventory in multiple sclerosis patients. Multiple Sclerosis, 9(2), 160–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, E.E., & Dahl, R.E. (2005). Neural systems of positive affect: relevance to understanding child and adolescent depression? Developmental Psychopathology, 17(3), 827–850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwata, N., Mishima, N., Shimizu, T., Mizoue, T., Fukuhara, M., Hidano, T., & Spielberger, C.D. (1998). Positive and negative affect in the factor structure of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Japanese workers. Psychological Reports, 82(2), 651–656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyenhuis, D.L., Luchetta, T., Yamamoto, C., Terrien, A., Bernardin, L., Rao, S.M., & Garron, D.C. (1998). The development, standardization, and initial validation of the Chicago Multiscale Depression Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(2), 386–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyenhuis, D.L., Rao, S.M., Zajecka, J.M., Luchetta, T., Bernardin, L., & Garron, D.C. (1995). Mood disturbance versus other symptoms of depression in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1(3), 291–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olino, T.M., Klein, D.N., Lewinsohn, P.M., Rohde, P., & Seeley, J.R. (2008). Longitudinal associations between depressive and anxiety disorders: a comparison of two trait models. Psychological Medicine, 38(3), 353–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phan, K.L., Wager, T., Taylor, S.F., & Liberzon, I. (2002). Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage, 16(2), 331–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polman, C., Reingold, S., Banwell, B., Clanet, M., Cohen, B.J., Filippi, M., & Wolinsky, J.S. (2010). Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald Criteria. Annals of Neurology, 69, 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielberger, C.D. (1983). State-Triat Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Starkstein, S.E., Merello, M., Jorge, R., Brockman, S., Bruce, D., & Power, B. (2009). The syndromal validity and nosological position of apathy in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 24(8), 1211–1216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strober, L.B., & Arnett, P.A. (2015). Depression in multiple sclerosis: The utility of common self-report instruments and development of a disease-specific measure. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 7(7), 722–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wager, T.D., Phan, K.L., Liberzon, I., & Taylor, S.F. (2003). Valence, gender, and lateralization of functional brain anatomy in emotion: a meta-analysis of findings from neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 19(3), 513–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Carey, G. (1988). Positive and negative affectivity and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(3), 346–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed