Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:31:25.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coexistence of posttraumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury: Towards a resolution of the paradox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2003

ALLISON G. HARVEY ,
CHRIS R. BREWIN ,
CHARLIE JONES  and
MICHAEL D. KOPELMAN
ALLISON G. HARVEY
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
CHRIS R. BREWIN
Affiliation:
Subdepartment of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London, UK
CHARLIE JONES
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
MICHAEL D. KOPELMAN
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Guy's, King's and St. Thomas's School of Medicine, Kings College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The coexistence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic head or brain injury (TBI) in the same individual has been proposed to be paradoxical. It has been argued that individuals who sustain a TBI and have no conscious memory of their trauma will not experience fear, helplessness and horror during the trauma, nor will they develop reexperiencing symptoms or establish the negative associations that underlie avoidance symptoms. However, single case reports and incidence studies suggest that PTSD can be diagnosed following TBI. We highlight critical issues in assessment, definitions, and research methods, and propose two possible resolutions of the paradox. One resolution focuses on ambiguity in the criteria for diagnosing PTSD. The other involves accepting that TBI patients do experience similar symptoms to other PTSD patients, but that there are crucial differences in symptom content. (JINS, 2003, 9, 663–676.)

Keywords

Posttraumatic stress disorderTraumatic brain injuryMemory
Type
CRITICAL REVIEW
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , May 2003 , pp. 663 - 676
Copyright
2003 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)