Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:40:19.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predicting change with the RBANS in a community dwelling elderly sample

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2004

KEVIN DUFF ,
MIKE R. SCHOENBERG ,
DOYLE PATTON ,
JAMES MOLD ,
JAMES G. SCOTT  and
RUSSELL L. ADAMS
KEVIN DUFF
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City
MIKE R. SCHOENBERG
Affiliation:
University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Cleveland, Ohio
DOYLE PATTON
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University at Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
JAMES MOLD
Affiliation:
Department of Family Medicine, University at Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
JAMES G. SCOTT
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University at Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
RUSSELL L. ADAMS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University at Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Repeated neuropsychological assessments are common with older adults, and the determination of clinically significant change across time is an important issue. Regression-based prediction formulas have been utilized with other patient and healthy control samples to predict follow-up test performance based on initial performance and demographic variables. Comparisons between predicted and observed follow-up performances can assist clinicians in determining the significance of change in the individual patient. In the current study, multiple regression-based prediction equations for the 5 Indexes and Total Score of the RBANS were developed for a sample of 223 community dwelling older adults. These algorithms were then validated on a separate elderly sample (N = 222). Minimal differences were present between observed and predicted follow-up scores in the validation sample, suggesting that the prediction formulas are clinically useful for practitioners who assess older adults. A case example is presented that illustrates how the algorithms can be used clinically. (JINS, 2004, 10, 828–834.)

Keywords

Predicting cognitive changeRBANSOlder adultsNeuropsychology
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 10 , Issue 6 , October 2004 , pp. 828 - 834
Copyright
© 2004 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Psychological Associate Working Group on the Older Adult. (1998). What practitioners should know about working with older adults. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 413–427.Google Scholar
Beatty, W.W., Mold, J.W., & Gontkovsky, S.T. (2003). RBANS performance: Influences of sex and education. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 1065–1069.Google Scholar
Bruggemans, E.F., Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Huysmans, H.A. (1997). Assessment of cognitive deterioration in individual patients following cardiac surgery: Correcting for measurement error and practice effects. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 543–559.Google Scholar
Chelune, G.J., Naugle, R.I., Luders, H., Sedlak, J., & Awad, I.A. (1993). Individual change after epilepsy surgery: Practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology, 7, 41–52.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Duff, K., Patton, D.E., Schoenberg, M.R., Mold, J., Scott, J.G., & Adams, R.A. (2003). Age- and education-corrected independent normative data for the RBANS in a community dwelling elderly sample. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 351–366.Google Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini Mental State”: A practical guide of grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.Google Scholar
Heaton, R.K., Grant, I., & Matthews, C.G. (1991). Comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographic corrections, research findings, and clinical applications. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Hermann, B.P., Seidenberg, M., Schoenfeld, J., Peterson, J., Leveroni, C., & Wyler, A.R. (1996). Empirical techniques for determining the reliability, magnitude, and pattern of neuropsychological change after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia, 37, 942–950.Google Scholar
Jacobson, N.S. & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.Google Scholar
Mattis, S. (1988). Dementia Rating Scale Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
McCaffrey, R.J., Duff, K., & Westervelt, H.J. (2000). Practitioner's guide to evaluating change with neuropsychological assessment instruments. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
McSweeny, A.J., Naugle, R.I., Chelune, G.J., & Luders, H. (1993). “T scores for change”: An illustration of a regression approach to depicting change in clinical neuropsychology. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7, 300–312.Google Scholar
Patton, D.E., Duff, K., Schoenberg, M.R., Mold, J., Scott, J.G., & Adams, R.A. (2003). Performance of cognitively normal African Americans on the RBANS in community dwelling older adults. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 513–530.Google Scholar
Randolph, C. (1998). Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Rapport, L.J., Axelrod, B.N., Theisen, M.E., Brines, B., Kalechstein, A.D., & Ricker, J.H. (1997a). Relationship of IQ to verbal learning and memory: Test and retest. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 655–666.Google Scholar
Rapport, L.J., Brines, B., Axelrod, B.N., & Theisen, M.E. (1997b). Full scale IQ as mediator of practice effects: The rich get richer. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 375–380.Google Scholar
Rentz, D.R., Huh, T.J., Faust, R.R., Budson, A.E., Scinto, L.F.M., Sperling, R.A., & Daffner, K.R. (2004). Use of IQ-adjusted norms to predict progressive cognitive decline in highly intelligent older individuals. Neuropsychology, 18, 38–49.Google Scholar
Sawrie, S.M., Chelune, G.J., Naugle, R.I., & Luders, H.O. (1996). Empirical methods for assessing meaningful neuropsychological change following epilepsy surgery. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 556–564.Google Scholar
Sawrie, S.M., Marson, D.C., Boothe, A.L., & Harrell, L.E. (1999). A method for assessing clinically relevant individual cognitive change in older adult populations. Journals of Gerontology Series B–Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 54, P116–P124.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
Temkin, N.R., Heaton, R.K., Grant, I., Dikmen, S.A. (1999). Detecting significant change in neuropsychological test performance: A comparison of four models. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 357–369.Google Scholar
Wilk, C.M., Gold, J.M., Bartko, J.J., Dickerson, F., Fenton, W.S., Knable, M., Randolph, C., & Buchanan, R.W. (2002). Test–retest stability of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 838–844.Google Scholar
Zegers, F.E. & Hafkenscheid, A. (1994). The ultimate reliable change index: An alternative to the Hageman and Arrindell approach. (Heymans Bulletins HB-94-1154-EX). Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen.