Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:18:28.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence for an attentional bias for washing- and checking-relevant stimuli in obsessive–compulsive disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

STEFFEN MORITZ*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg—Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
ADRIAN VON MÜHLENEN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
SARAH RANDJBAR
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg—Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
SUSANNE FRICKE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg—Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
LENA JELINEK
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg—Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
*
*Correspondence and reprint requests to: Steffen Moritz, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg—Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

There is equivocal evidence whether or not patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) share an attentional bias for concern-related material and if so, whether this reflects hypervigilance towards or problems to disengage from disorder-related material. In a recent study, we failed to detect an attentional bias in OCD patients using an emotional variant of the inhibition of return (IOR) paradigm containing OCD-relevant and neutral words. We reinvestigated the research question with a more stringent design that addressed potential moderators. A new IOR paradigm was set up using visual stimuli. Forty-two OCD patients and 31 healthy controls were presented with neutral (e.g., cup), anxiety-relevant (e.g., shark), checking-relevant (e.g., broken door), and washing-relevant (e.g., dirty toilet) cue pictures at one of two possible locations. Following a short or long interval sensitive to automatic versus controlled processes, a simple target stimulus appeared at either the cued or the uncued location. OCD patients responded significantly slower to targets that were preceded by an OCD-relevant cue. Results lend support to the claim that OCD patients share a processing abnormality for concern-related visual material. (JINS, 2009, 15, 365–371.)

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amir, N., Elias, J., Klumpp, H., & Przeworski, A. (2003). Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: Facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 13251335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J.R. (1974). Retrieval of prepositional information from long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 451474.Google Scholar
Becker, E.S. & Rinck, M. (2006). Aufmerksamkeitsverzerrungen bei Spinnenphobie: Erst Vigilanz, dann Vermeidung [Attentional biases in spider phobia: First vigilance, then avoidance]. In Alpers, G.W., Krebs, H., Mühlberger, A., Weyers, P. & Pauli, P. (Eds.), Wissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 24. Symposium der Fachgruppe Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie (p. 27). Würzburg, Germany: Pabst.Google Scholar
Coles, M.E., Heimberg, R.G., Frost, R.O., & Steketee, G. (2005). Not just right experiences and obsessive-compulsive features: Experimental and self-monitoring perspectives. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 153167.Google Scholar
Foa, E.B., Ilai, D., McCarthy, P.R., Shoyer, B., & Murdock, T. (1993). Information processing in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 173189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R.J., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in sub-clinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 130, 681700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgiou, G.A., Bleakley, C., Hayward, J., Russo, R., Dutton, K., Eltiti, S., & Fox, E. (2005). Focusing on fear: Attentional disengagement from emotional faces. Visual Cognition, 12, 145158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, W., Rasmussen, S., Price, L., Mazure, L., Heninger, G., & Charney, D. (1991). Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Verhaltenstherapie, 1, 226233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 23, 5662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hand, I. & Büttner-Westphal, H. (1991). Die Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS): Ein halbstrukturiertes Interview zur Beurteilung des Schweregrades von Denk- und Handlungszwängen. Verhaltenstherapie, 1, 223225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolassa, I.T., Buchmann, A., Lauche, R., Kolassa, S., Partchev, I., Miltner, W.H., & Musial, F. (2007). Spider phobics more easily see a spider in morphed schematic pictures. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3, 59.Google Scholar
Kyrios, M. & Iob, M.A. (1998). Automatic and strategic processing in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Attentional bias, cognitive avoidance or more complex phenomena? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 12, 271292.Google Scholar
Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., & Cuthbert, B.N. (1999). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Gainesville, FL: Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Lavy, E., van Oppen, P., & van den Hout, M. (1994). Selective processing of emotional information in obsessive compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 243246.Google Scholar
Lipp, O.V. & Derakshan, N. (2005). Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task. Emotion, 5, 365369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, A. & MacLeod, C. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 167195.Google Scholar
McNally, R.J., Amir, N., Louro, C.E., Lukach, B.M., Rieman, B.C., & Calamari, J.E. (1994). Cognitive processing of idiographic emotional information in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 119122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNally, R.J., Rieman, B.C., Louro, C.E., Lukach, B.M., & Kim, E. (1992). Cognitive processing of emotional information in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 143149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeil, D.W., Tucker, P., Miranda, R., Lewin, M.R., & Nordgren, J.C. (1999). Response to depression and anxiety Stroop stimuli in posttraumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and major depressive disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 187, 512516.Google Scholar
Moritz, S., Fischer, B.K., Hottenrott, B., Kellner, M., Fricke, S., Randjbar, S., & Jelinek, L. (2008). Words may not be enough! No increased emotional Stroop effect in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 10011004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moritz, S., Jacobsen, D., Kloss, M., Fricke, S., Rufer, M., & Hand, I. (2004). Examination of emotional Stroop interference in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 671682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moritz, S. & Jelinek, L. (2007). Association splitting—Self-help guide for reducing obsessive thoughts. Hamburg, Germany: VanHam Campus Press. http://www.uke.de/assoziationsspaltungGoogle Scholar
Moritz, S., Jelinek, L., Klinge, R., & Naber, D. (2007). Fight fire with fireflies! Association splitting: A novel cognitive technique to reduce obsessive thoughts. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35, 631635.Google Scholar
Moritz, S. & Laudan, A. (2007). Attention bias for paranoia-relevant visual stimuli in schizophrenia. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 12, 381390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moritz, S. & von Mühlenen, A. (2005). Inhibition of return in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 19, 117126.Google Scholar
Moritz, S. & von Mühlenen, A. (2008). Investigation of an attentional bias for fear-related material in obsessive-compulsive checkers. Depression and Anxiety, 25, 225229.Google Scholar
Neely, J.H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In Besner, D. & Humphreys, G.W. (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Novara, C. & Sanavio, E. (2001). Compulsive checking and selective processing of threatening information. Psychological Reports, 88, 11711181.Google Scholar
Olley, A., Malhi, G., & Sachdev, P. (2007). Memory and executive functioning in obsessive–compulsive disorder: A selective review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 104, 1523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, M.I. & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In Bouma, H. & Bouwhuis, D. (Eds.), Attention and performance, Vol. X (pp. 531556). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rotge, J.Y., Guehl, D., Dilharreguy, B., Tignol, J., Bioulac, B., Allard, M., & Aouizerate, B. (2009). Meta-analysis of brain volume changes in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 65, 7583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheehan, D.V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K.H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., Hergueta, T., Baker, R., & Dunbar, G.C. (1998). The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59(Suppl 20), 2233.Google Scholar
Summerfeldt, L.J. & Endler, N.S. (1998). Examining the evidence for anxiety-related cognitive biases in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 12, 579598.Google Scholar
Wieser, M.J., Pauli, P., Weyers, P., Alpers, G.W., & Mühlberger, A. (in press). Fear of negative evaluation and the hypervigilance-avoidance hypothesis: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Neural Transmission.Google Scholar
Williams, J.M., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 324.Google Scholar