Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:13:21.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Neritidae from southwestern North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

Alan J. Cushing Woods
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242
L. R. Saul
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles 90024

Abstract

In southwestern Baja California Norte a new species of Early Tertiary Tethyan gastropod, Velates, V. vizcainoensis n. sp., occurs with a previously unknown intertidal molluscan fauna suggestive of an unprotected coastline of probable Paleocene age. Comparison of Velates vizcainoensis n. sp. to other forms previously assigned to Velates from southwestern North America suggests that “Nerita” cuneata Gabb of Late Cretaceous age probably belongs in Neritina (Dostia), as do N. (D.) aff. N. (D.) cuneata and N. (D.) escondita n. sp.

Velates is probably derived from typical Otostoma and is an early Tertiary genus. Velates californicus Vokes, although originally described as being from the Llajas Formation of middle Eocene age, is from the upper Santa Susana Formation and probably is of late Paleocene age at its type locality.

Two other neritid gastropods are present in the fauna with Velates vizcainoensis; namely, Corsania (Januncia) Janus n. subgen., n. sp. and Nerita (Theliostyla) n. sp.(?). Corsania Vidal, 1917, is a genus distinct from Otostoma and ranges from Early Cretaceous to Paleocene. Januncia n. subgen. has a Tethyan distribution and ranges from Maastrichtian through Paleocene.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, E. C. 1955. Middle Cretaceous Gastropoda from Punta China, Baja California, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 29:400432.Google Scholar
de Saint-Simon, Archiac, d', E. J. A. and Haime, J. 1853–1854. Description des animaux fossiles du groupe nummulitique de l'Inde. Paris, 2 vols., 373 p.Google Scholar
Bataller, J. R. 1949. Sinopsis de las especies nuevas del Cretácico de España. Pars VIII—Mollusca 2, Gastropoda. Barcelona, Escuela de peritos agrícolas y de especialidades agropecuarias y de los servicios técnicos de agricultura, Anales, 8:5148.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., Flynn, J. J. and Vancouvering, J. A. 1985. Cenozoic geochronology. Geological Society of America, Bulletin, 96:14071418.Google Scholar
Bezançon, Alphonse. 1870. Descriptions d'espèces nouvelles du bassin de Paris. Journal de Conchyliologie, 18:310323.Google Scholar
Bontscheff, St. 1897 (1896). Das Tertiärbecken von Haskovo (Bulgarien). Kaiserlich-koeniglichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt (Wien) Jahrbuch, 46:309384.Google Scholar
Chavan, André. 1949. Nouvelle contribution à l'étude des mollusques de Vigny. Société Géologique de France, Comptes Rendue des Séances, p. 243245.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L. and Durham, J. W. 1946. Eocene faunas from the Department of Bolivar, Colombia. Geological Society of America, Memoir 16, 126 p.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W. 1919. Tertiary mollusks from the Leeward Islands and Cuba. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 291, p. 103156.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W. 1946. Velates vokesi, a new name for Neritina? grandis Cooke. Journal of Paleontology, 20:295.Google Scholar
Cossmann, Maurice. 1925. Essais de paléoconchologie comparée. Press Universitaires de France, Paris, vol. 13, 345 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, Maurice. 1910–1913. Iconographie complète des coquilles fossiles de l'éocène des environs de Paris. Paris, vol. 2, 65 pl.Google Scholar
Cossmann, Maurice. and Pissarro, G. 1909. The Mollusca of the Ranikot Series: 1. Cephalopoda and Gastropoda. India Geological Survey, Memoirs, Paleontologica Indica, new series, 3:183.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1931. Contribution to the molluscan fauna of the Laki and basal Khirthar groups of the Indian Eocene. Royal Society of Edinburgh, Transactions, 57:2592.Google Scholar
Davies, A. M. 1934. Tertiary Faunas. Thomas Murby & Co., London, vol. 2, 252 p.Google Scholar
Davies, A. M. (revised by Eames, F. E. and Savage, R. J. G.) 1975. Tertiary Faunas. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London, vol. 2, 447 p.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G. P. 1824. Note sur un nouveau genre de la famille des Néritacées. Annales des sciences naturelles (Paris), 1:187192.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G. P. 1824a–1837. Description des coquilles fossiles des environs de Paris. Paris, vol. 2(1824), 814 p., atlas (1837).Google Scholar
Deshayes, G. P. 1864–1865. Description des animaux sans vertèbres découverts dans le bassin de Paris. Baillière, Paris, vol. 3, 668 p., atlas, vol. 2 (1866), 107 Pls.Google Scholar
Douvillé, Henri. 1904. Paléontologie, mollusques fossiles, p. 191380. In De Morgan, J. Mission scientifique en Perse, vol. 3, part 4, E. Leroux, Paris.Google Scholar
Douvillé, Henri. 1916. Le Crétacé et l'éocène du Tibet Central. India Geological Survey, Palaeontologia Indica, Memoirs, New Series, 5(3):152.Google Scholar
Eames, F. E., Banner, F. T., Blow, W. H. and Clarke, W. J. 1962. Fundamentals of Mid-Tertiary Stratigraphical Correlation. Cambridge University Press, 163 p.Google Scholar
Eames, F. E. 1965. Dating of some beds in Panama and Trinidad. Journal of Paleontology, 39:162163.Google Scholar
Malian, Farrés, Francisco, and Staid-Staadt, J. L. 1964. Las correlaciones faciales del Lediense y su fauna de moluscos en la Comarca de Vich. Patronato de Estudios Ausonenses, Seccion de Ciencias, 42 p.Google Scholar
Fife, D. L. 1968. Geology of the Bahía Santa Rosalia Quadrangle, Baja California, Mexico. Unpublished M.S. thesis, California State University, San Diego, 100 p.Google Scholar
Fife, D. L. 1974. Reconnaissance geology of the Bahía de Santa Rosalia Quadrangle, Estado de Baja California, Mexico, p. 91103. In Gàstil, R. G. and Lillegraven, J. (eds.), Geology of Peninsular California. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, and Society of Economic Geophysisists, Pacific Sections, Guidebook.Google Scholar
Filewicz, M. V. and Hill, M. E. III. 1983. Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Santa Susana and Llajas Formations, north side Simi Valley, p. 4566. In Squires, R. L. and Filewicz, M. V. (eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Simi Valley Area, Southern California. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Fall Field Trip Volume and Guidebook.Google Scholar
Fischer, Paul. 1880–1887. Manuel de conchyliologie et de paléontologie conchyliologique. F. Savy, Paris, 1369 p.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1864. Description of the Cretaceous fossils. California Geological Survey, Palaeontology, 1:57243 (1864), Pls. 9–32 (1865).Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1869. Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils. California Geological Survey, Palaeontology, 2:1299.Google Scholar
Gastil, G. R., Phillips, R. P. and Allison, E. C. 1973. Reconnaissance geologic map of the state of Baja California. Geological Society of America.Google Scholar
Gastil, G. R., Phillips, R. P. and Allison, E. C. 1975. Reconnaissance geology of the state of Baja California. Geological Society of America, Memoir 140, 170 p.Google Scholar
Givens, C. R. 1974. Eocene molluscan biostratigraphy of the Pine Mountain area, Ventura County, California. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences, vol. 109, 107 p.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F. 1791. Caroli a Linné systema naturae per regna tria naturae. Editio decima tertia. Leipzig [“Lipsiae”], vol. 1, part 6, cl. 6, Vermes, p. 30213910.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1842. Synopsis of the Contents of the British Museum. London, 44th edition, iv + 308 p.Google Scholar
Heitman, H. L. 1983. Paleoecological analysis and biostratigraphy of the lower Paleocene Santa Susana Formation, northern Simi Valley, Ventura County, California, p. 3343. In Squires, R. L. and Filewicz, M. V. (eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Simi Valley Area, Southern California. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Fall Field Trip Volume and Guidebook.Google Scholar
Kappeler, K. A., Squires, R. L. and Fritsche, A. E. 1984. Transgressive marginal-marine deposits of the Avenal Sandstone, Reef Ridge, central California, p. 927. In Blueford, J. R. (ed.), Kreyenhagen Formation and Related Rocks. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Book 37.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. and Cox, L. R. 1960. Neritidae, p. I279–I285. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Mollusca 1, part I. Geological Society of America and Kansas University Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Klinger, H. C. and Kennedy, W. J. 1980. The Umzamba Formation at its type section, Umzamba Estuary (Pondoland, Transkei), the ammonite content and paleogeographical distribution. South African Museum, Annals, 81:207222.Google Scholar
Nagao, Takumi. 1934. Cretaceous Mollusca from the Miyako District, Honshu, Japan. (Lamellibranchiata and Gastropoda). Hokkaido Imperial University, Faculty of Science, Journal, series 4, Geology and Mineralogy, 2:177277.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. N. 1925. A contribution to the paleontology of the Martinez Eocene of California. University of California Publications, Department of Geological Sciences, Bulletin, 15:397466.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. D. d'. 1850. Prodome de paléontologie stratigraphique universelle de animaux mollusques et rayonnés. V. Masson, Paris, vol. 2, 427 p.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W. 1967. A comparison of certain Eocene molluscs of the Americas with those of the western Tethys, p. 183193. In Adams, C. G. and Ager, D. V. (eds.), Aspects of Tethyan Biogeography. Systematics Association, London, Publication 7.Google Scholar
Parker, J. D. 1983. Lower Paleocene to lower Eocene, nonmarine to deep-marine strata of the Simi Hills, Ventura County, California, p. 322. In Squires, R. L. and Filewicz, M. V. (eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Simi Valley Area, Southern California. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Fall Field Trip Volume and Guidebook.Google Scholar
Pinard, A. 1936. Présence d'une nérite voisine de Velates schmideliana dans le Montien de Vigny. Société Géologique de France, Compte rendu sommaire des séances, p. 100102.Google Scholar
Richards, H. G. 1946. A gastropod of the genus Velates from the Florida Eocene. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Notulae Naturae, 177, 6 p.Google Scholar
Santillán, Manuel and Barrera, Tomas. 1930. Las posibilidades petrolíferas en la costa occidental de la Baja California, entre los paralelos 30° y 32° de latitud norte. México (City) Universidad Nacional, Instituto de Geología, Anales, 5:137.Google Scholar
Sastry, M. V. A., Rao, B. R. J. and Mamgain, V. D. 1968. Biostratigraphic zonation of the Upper Cretaceous formations of Trichinopoly District, South India. Geological Society of India, Memoir 2, p. 1017.Google Scholar
Saul, L. R. 1983. Turritella zonation across the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary, California. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, vol. 125, 164 p.Google Scholar
Saul, L. R. 1983a. Notes on Paleocene turritellas, venericardias, and molluscan stages of the Simi Valley area, California, p. 7180. In Squires, R. L. and Filewicz, M. V. (eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Simi Valley Area, Southern California. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Fall Field Trip Volume and Guidebook.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1981. A transitional alluvial to marine sequence: the Eocene Llajas Formation, southern California. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 51:923938.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1983. Eocene Llajas Formation, Simi Valley, Southern California, p. 8195. In Squires, R. L. and Filewicz, M. V. (eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Simi Valley Area, Southern California. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Fall Field Trip Volume and Guidebook.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1983a. Geologic map of the Simi Valley area, Southern California. In Squires, R. L. and Filewicz, M. V. (eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Simi Valley area, Southern California. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Fall Field Trip Volume and Guidebook.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1984. Megapaleontology of the Eocene Llajas Formation, Simi Valley, California. Los Angeles County Natural History Museum, Contributions in Science, Number 350, 76 p.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. B. 1927. Gabb's California fossil type gastropods. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Proceedings, 78:287447.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. B. 1946. Geology of Reef Ridge, Coalinga District, California. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 205-C, p. 81115.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, Ferd. 1867–1868. Cretaceous Fauna of Southern India, vol. 2, The Gastropoda of the Cretaceous rocks of southern India. India Geological Survey, Memoirs, Palaeontologica Indica, series V, 497 p.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators and grazers. Paleobiology, 3:245258.Google Scholar
Vidal, L. M. 1917. Nota paleontólogica sobre el Crétaceo de Cataluña. Asociación Española progreso de las ciencias, Congreso de Sevilla. Barcelona. Tomo V (con varias laminas), 19 p.Google Scholar
Vokes, H. E. 1935. The genus Velates in the Eocene of California. University of California Publications, Department of Geological Sciences Bulletin, 23:381390.Google Scholar
Vokes, H. E. 1939. Molluscan faunas of the Domengine and Arroyo Hondo Formations of the California Eocene. New York Academy of Sciences, Annals, 38:1246.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1887. Contributions to the paleontology of Brazil; comprising descriptions of Cretaceous invertebrate fossils, mainly from the Provinces of Sergipe, Pernambuco, Pará and Bahia. Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, Archivos, 7:1273.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1957. Geology and paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. Geology and description of Tertiary mollusks (gastropods: Trochidae to Turritellidae). United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 306-A, p. 1145.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1973. Geology and paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. Description of Tertiary mollusks (additions to gastropods, scaphopods, pelecypods: Nuculidae to Malleidae). United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 306-E, p. 453539.Google Scholar
Woods, A. J. 1978. Marine terraces between Playa El Marron and Morro Santo Domingo, central Baja California, Mexico. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 181 p.Google Scholar
Woods, A. J. 1980. Geomorphology, deformation and chronology of marine terraces along the Pacific Coast of Central Baja California, Mexico. Quaternary Research, 13:346364.Google Scholar
Woods, Henry. 1906. The Cretaceous fauna of Pondoland. South African Museum, Annals, 4:275350.Google Scholar
Woodward, B. B. 1892. On the growth and the structure of the shell in Velates conoideus, Lamk., and other Neritidae . Zoological Society of London, Proceedings, p. 528540.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1960. General characters of Mollusca, p. I3–I36. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Mollusca 1, part I. Geological Society of America and Kansas University Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. 1974. Paleocene biostratigraphy of the Simi Hills, Ventura County, California. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Riverside, 236 p.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. 1975. Biostratigraphy of the upper Paleocene (Thanetian) molluscan fauna of the Simi Hills, Ventura County, California. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 7(3):391392.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. 1983. New late Paleocene mollusks from the Simi Hills, Ventura County, California. Journal of Paleontology, 57:12821304.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. 1881–1885. Handbuch der Palaeontologie. I. Palaeozoologie. Band 2. Mollusca und Arthropoda. R. Oldenbourg, München und Leipzig, 893 p.Google Scholar